1027 users online (201 members and 826 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 76
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. Buddha
    Posts
    19,491

    Atlanta 2000 Interviews

    River I hope you don't mind but I would like to post a link to FFJ.

    Spade has transcribed part of the Atlanta interviews. It's a must read in my book.

    http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...5081#post45081

    Thanks River. I hope I am not out of line.

    Tricia
    Help our Administrator Bessie
    Check out our Facebook page
    Follow me on Twitter

    Tricia Griffith
    triciastruecrimeradio@gmail.com
    6300 N. Sage Wood Drive
    Suite H # 214
    Park City UT
    84098






  2. #2

    IMHO...it's a MUST READ !!!

    Originally posted by Tricia
    River I hope you don't mind but I would like to post a link to FFJ.

    Spade has transcribed part of the Atlanta interviews. It's a must read in my book.

    http://www.forumsforjustice.org/foru...5081#post45081

    Thanks River. I hope I am not out of line.

    Tricia
    THANK YOU!!! IMHO...it's a MUST READ !!!; I reposted it somewhere (?) ...!!!???

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Tricia, I see that this is the first time these interviews have been posted on the Web. Have they just been released or has Spade got them from some other source?
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  4. #4

    Part 1 & 2(?)

    Atlanta 2000
    This is an excerpt from Bruce Levin's interview of Patsy Ramsey in Lin Wood's office. The next time Jams or any other idiot says that the Ramsey's have never pointed the finger at the White's use this to point out the truth. Everytime I re-read this I get more PO'd. John and Patsy are truly scum. The numbers are from the videotape this was transcribed from. They drive my scanner nuts.

    BRUCE:
    08:57:59:15 No. And I I certainly, Mr. Wood, would not expect her to do
    that. That's not where I was going.

    LIN WOOD:
    08:58:03:21 I understand.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:04:01 But if this makes you more comfortable, I'll ask the question another way.

    LIN WOOD:
    08:58:06:18 Thank you very much.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:09:03 You've named Priscilla White in the past as a possible
    suspect. During the course of the last two years, have you rejected that as
    a possible suspect in the murder of your daughter? Have you rejected
    Priscilla White?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:58:21:21 No.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:23;06 You've named Fleet White, I believe, as a suspect.
    Same question. Have you rejected him as a possible suspect?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:58:28:23 No

    BRUCE:
    08:58:29:24 Phil McReynolds?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:58:30:11 No.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:32:25 And no, you have not rejected them?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:58:33:18 No, I have not rejected him.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:35:02 And I believe Chris Wolf (PH). You also named--



    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:58:37:16 No, we-- has not been -- rejected.

    BRUCE:
    08:58:43:02 1 assume, then, that that's a function of the fact that you—
    (BACKGROUND NOISE) have not received any significant information concerning
    the murder of your child in the last two years that differs from the information that
    you received prior to your interviews with representatives of the Boulder District
    Attorney's Office.

    LIN WOOD:
    08:59:02:12 Hold it a second. We answered that. (PAUSE)
    You understand that?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    08:59:13:17 Not really.

    BRUCE:
    08:59:15:14 Okay, I'll-- I'll-- I'll rephrase it for you. In-- June of 1998, the
    individuals that I've named were, in your mind, potential suspects in the murder
    of your child, correct?

    PATSY RAMSEY:

    08:59:27 Mm-hmm. (AFFIRMATIVE) correct.

    BRUCE:

    08:59:30:03 You tell us that today -- in August of the year 2000, that those
    individuals remain suspects, correct?

    PATSY RAMSEY:

    08:59:38:22 Correct.

    BRUCE:
    08:59:39;20 1 am assuming, based on that, that you have not received through
    your investigators, or through your experts, any significant new information
    about the killing, which caused you to abandon those opinions or suspicions.

    LIN WOOD:
    08:59:56:18 Lemme just caution you. Because he tells you it's sumthin' that he
    assumes, Patsy. I mean I think what he really wants to know is why have you not
    necessarily rejected these people in your own mind. Follow me? That's that I think
    an easier question. Isn't that what you're driving at, Bruce? I mean

    BRUCE:
    9:00:13:15 Well no

    LIN WOOD:
    09:00:13:28 Like for example, Chris Wolf

    BRUCE:
    09:00:14:17 NO, it's not.

    LIN WOOD:
    09:00:15:09 why why do you still think he's not, in your mind, rejected
    as a suspect. You know, what you're trying to get her to answer.

    BRUCE:
    09:00:20:04 What what I wanna know is is it would seem to me that, if you
    have people d-- who are working on this case for you to develop information
    concerning the killer, that if they had developed anything significant, that it might
    impact your belief that Priscilla or Fleet or McReynolds or Wolf was involved. Do
    you understand that so far?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:00:46:10 Yes.

    BRUCE:
    09:00:47:06 Is it a fair statement that you have not received any significant
    information concerning the murder of JonBenet in two years?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:00:57:03 Now

    LIN WOOD:
    09:00:58:15 About?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:00:59:15 We have significant information.

    BRUCE:
    09:01:02:25 Okay. So why don't you

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:01:02:20 About the murder.


    BRUCE:
    09:01:03:11 Okay. Why don't you tell us what-- what is the significant
    information that you've been provided in the past two years.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:01:11 Okay. Well, this --

    BRUCE:
    09:01:12:18 And again, I'm not gonna you know, I'm not gonna ask you months
    and days, when did you find this out. But I'd like to

    LIN WOOD:
    09:01:16:22 Significant information as to specific people?

    BRUCE:
    09:01:18:26 Specific information concerning the killer, generally. And you can
    you can block it out any way you want.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:01:25:06 Okay. Well, I don't know a whole lot of detail. John will-- perhaps
    be much b

  5. #5

    Smile PART 1 (SWEET?!) or is it PART 2?! hum?

    from the same interview. Lots of references to Chris Wolfe's ex-girlfriend. Also, note the reference to pineapple at the end. this come up later also. Michael is M Kane:

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:23;02 We know what you said about Priscilla White. I'm just my question is since we talked to you last, have you developed any evidence that would confirmed your suspicion as far as Priscilla White is concerned? Anything that you know of during the course of the investigation that you have conducted that would keep her on this list independent of what you might think we know, that kind of a thing?

    PATSY RAMSEY:


    09:24:47;10 No.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:48;25 Oh, how about Fleet White? Anything that you have developed since the last time we spoke to you that would keep him on the
    sus or keep him on this list.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:59;29 You're talking about whether the investigators have developed information as opposed to like an event occurring, such as

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:03;27 Right, anything you knew that we don't.
    09:25:05;17 (OVERTALK)

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:05;29 (LAUGHTER) Which is a little odd.

    MALE VOICE:

    09:25:09;07 Anything new that we don't know about Fleet White that you have developed or your investigators have developed?

    PATSY RAMSEY:


    09:25:15;25 1 can't remember any. The only I just heard recently that he that we had come across a copy of his-- statement to you folks, or to the police department, on or the day after JonBenet's death. And that he was asked about the ransom note and could-- very closely recite the contents. Which-- seemed unusual.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:50;28 He the same I guess the same question, in regard to Mr. McReynolds (PH), and I' m sorry, I don't remember Mr. McReynolds's first name.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:58;23 Is it Bill? William

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:59;18 Bill, William, yes. Anything I know he eventual his name came up. And I was wondering if anything since the last time
    you spoke to, I believe it was the Boulder district attorneys. I think after the formal discussion you had on tape and everything, then you went, and I heard an audiotape of where you were focusing on Mr. McReynolds himself with Mr. Demue (PH) and a couple of other people.

    09:26:30;00 1 was wondering if anything any follow up had been done as far as your investigation was concerned? Any new information on Mr. McReynolds? Possible involvement?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:26:42;05 I don't know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:26:43;15 And Mr. Wolfe? I mean these -- Bruce asked you these kind of in a group of four. I was interested specifically, since, when we last spoke to you, what have you developed, if anything, about Mr. Wolfe?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:26:58;27 Well, I think subsequent to that, I know we have a tape from his-- one time girlfriend.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:07;14 Miss Dilson (PH)

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:08;23 Dilson. She videotaped herself employing John and me to help her. She's very
    frightened of him. She believes he did this. She is in hiding. You know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:28;03 Have you ever spoken to Miss Dilson in person? Or

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:34;13 I can't-- I can't remember.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:36;24 Okay. But you you viewed this tape asking for your help?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:41;08 Mmm Hmm (AFF.)

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:42;03 Anything other than the tape that would indicate to you or keep Mr. Wolfe in that position that he was in last time we spoke?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:S6;20 I just can't think of anything right now.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:00;29 Mrs. Ramsey, would you

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:02;08 Can I can I ask

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:04;10 1 was just gonna follow up

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:07;03 okay, go ahead.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:08;05 Have you sent your investigators out to interview Miss Dilson or locate her to try to follow up on this tape?

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:15;19 Well, let me help you a little bit. Chris Wolfe has filed a lawsuit against John and Patsy Ramsey. And so you can rest assured
    that Chris Wolfe and Miss Dilson, in terms of information, are being developed about that in terms of the defense to that case, among other things. If we come across anything in the course of that civil litigation, we'll get it as quickly as we can copy it and get it to you. (UNINTEL) study a lot of his appearances and some other things. So

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:44;08 So Mrs. Ramsey, I take it then, that the answer to my question, as far as to date, is no? That no one's gone out and attempted
    to interview Miss Dilson (UNINTEL)? If you know?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:28:56;01 1 don't know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:56;29 You have you received any reports or any summaries from any investigator that would cause you to believe that she was contacted directly by your representatives?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:07;09 1 just don't know. I mean John, perhaps, would know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:12;25 You have no recollection, as you sit here, of seeing any follow up information in any form?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:18;06 That's correct.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:20;16 This tape, was that unsolicited on the part of your family?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:24;07 Oh yes.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:25;22 When did you receive that?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:30;05 Probably some time last spring.


    RAM #13 Pg. 74

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:33;27 Spring of 199.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:36;10 No, spring of I think spring of 2000. Or
    maybe fall of 2000.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:44;16 Well, it wouldn't be fall, so maybe spring of this year.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:47;24 Yes, right.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:49;04 or fall of 1999.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:49;29 Yeah. I was thinking of when I know we
    saw it in our apartment. I'm trying to think
    when how long we've been in that apartment.
    So.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:30:00;04 Michael?

    MICHAEL:

  6. #6

    Question PART 2 FYI (?!)...:confused: :cool: :o :) :(

    ..;.
    from the same interview. Lots of references to Chris Wolfe's ex-girlfriend. Also, note the reference to pineapple at the end. this come up later also. Michael is M Kane:

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:23;02 We know what you said about Priscilla White. I'm just my question is since we talked to you last, have you developed any evidence that would confirmed your suspicion as far as Priscilla White is concerned? Anything that you know of during the course of the investigation that you have conducted that would keep her on this list independent of what you might think we know, that kind of a thing?

    PATSY RAMSEY:


    09:24:47;10 No.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:48;25 Oh, how about Fleet White? Anything that you have developed since the last time we spoke to you that would keep him on the
    sus or keep him on this list.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:24:59;29 You're talking about whether the investigators have developed information as opposed to like an event occurring, such as

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:03;27 Right, anything you knew that we don't.
    09:25:05;17 (OVERTALK)

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:05;29 (LAUGHTER) Which is a little odd.

    MALE VOICE:

    09:25:09;07 Anything new that we don't know about Fleet White that you have developed or your investigators have developed?

    PATSY RAMSEY:


    09:25:15;25 1 can't remember any. The only I just heard recently that he that we had come across a copy of his-- statement to you folks, or to the police department, on or the day after JonBenet's death. And that he was asked about the ransom note and could-- very closely recite the contents. Which-- seemed unusual.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:50;28 He the same I guess the same question, in regard to Mr. McReynolds (PH), and I' m sorry, I don't remember Mr. McReynolds's first name.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:58;23 Is it Bill? William

    MALE VOICE:
    09:25:59;18 Bill, William, yes. Anything I know he eventual his name came up. And I was wondering if anything since the last time
    you spoke to, I believe it was the Boulder district attorneys. I think after the formal discussion you had on tape and everything, then you went, and I heard an audiotape of where you were focusing on Mr. McReynolds himself with Mr. Demue (PH) and a couple of other people.

    09:26:30;00 1 was wondering if anything any follow up had been done as far as your investigation was concerned? Any new information on Mr. McReynolds? Possible involvement?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:26:42;05 I don't know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:26:43;15 And Mr. Wolfe? I mean these -- Bruce asked you these kind of in a group of four. I was interested specifically, since, when we last spoke to you, what have you developed, if anything, about Mr. Wolfe?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:26:58;27 Well, I think subsequent to that, I know we have a tape from his-- one time girlfriend.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:07;14 Miss Dilson (PH)

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:08;23 Dilson. She videotaped herself employing John and me to help her. She's very
    frightened of him. She believes he did this. She is in hiding. You know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:28;03 Have you ever spoken to Miss Dilson in person? Or

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:34;13 I can't-- I can't remember.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:36;24 Okay. But you you viewed this tape asking for your help?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:41;08 Mmm Hmm (AFF.)

    MALE VOICE:
    09:27:42;03 Anything other than the tape that would indicate to you or keep Mr. Wolfe in that position that he was in last time we spoke?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:27:S6;20 I just can't think of anything right now.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:00;29 Mrs. Ramsey, would you

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:02;08 Can I can I ask

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:04;10 1 was just gonna follow up

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:07;03 okay, go ahead.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:08;05 Have you sent your investigators out to interview Miss Dilson or locate her to try to follow up on this tape?

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:15;19 Well, let me help you a little bit. Chris Wolfe has filed a lawsuit against John and Patsy Ramsey. And so you can rest assured
    that Chris Wolfe and Miss Dilson, in terms of information, are being developed about that in terms of the defense to that case, among other things. If we come across anything in the course of that civil litigation, we'll get it as quickly as we can copy it and get it to you. (UNINTEL) study a lot of his appearances and some other things. So

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:44;08 So Mrs. Ramsey, I take it then, that the answer to my question, as far as to date, is no? That no one's gone out and attempted
    to interview Miss Dilson (UNINTEL)? If you know?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:28:56;01 1 don't know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:28:56;29 You have you received any reports or any summaries from any investigator that would cause you to believe that she was contacted directly by your representatives?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:07;09 1 just don't know. I mean John, perhaps, would know.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:12;25 You have no recollection, as you sit here, of seeing any follow up information in any form?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:18;06 That's correct.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:20;16 This tape, was that unsolicited on the part of your family?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:24;07 Oh yes.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:25;22 When did you receive that?

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:30;05 Probably some time last spring.


    RAM #13 Pg. 74

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:33;27 Spring of 199.

    PATSY RAMSEY:
    09:29:36;10 No, spring of I think spring of 2000. Or
    maybe fall of 2000.

    MALE VOICE:
    09:29:44;16 Well, it wouldn't be fall, so maybe spring of this year.

    PATSY RAMSEY

  7. #7

    :confused: :cool: :o :) :(


  8. #8
    These Atlanta interviews have not been legally released by lawyers for the Ramseys, or the District Attorney's office. Spade shouldn't be posting these, he shouldn't even have them. It is not legal to post them.

    I remember Spade making allegations about Darnay, Spade is posting materials that he is not supposed to have, that have not been released by those in lawful possession of them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Then Spade DOES have contacts/inside information? Interesting.
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    YFL says she has the tapes of those interviews. Is THAT illegal too?
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. Buddha
    Posts
    19,491
    Candy,

    ******* had parts of the Atlanta interviews up over 2 years ago.

    ******* posted the section where Michael Kane calls Lin Wood an "obstructionist?" Did you protest then that ******* had obtained the interviews illegally?

    Rather than dog Spade about where he gets such valuable info I think you should be grateful that he has brought so much info to us. I would think if anyone would be grateful it would be you. You know how important it is to get information out so the Ramseys know their PR campaign isn't working.

    I am thrilled that Spade has come forward with all kinds of new information. I look forward to what Spade will bring us next.

    Candy please don't create problems where there are none. When you do this it discourages others from coming forward.
    Help our Administrator Bessie
    Check out our Facebook page
    Follow me on Twitter

    Tricia Griffith
    triciastruecrimeradio@gmail.com
    6300 N. Sage Wood Drive
    Suite H # 214
    Park City UT
    84098






  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    ******* is accusing Spade of doctoring the transcript. She says that she's sent his post to Lin Wood. She says that she has the tapes and that Patsy wasn't shown a receipt for hi-tecs for Burke.

    What is interesting is that she says she hasn't got the time to go back and verify the tapes against the transcript!
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    350
    Thanks, Spade.

    Significant information from their detectives....my butt. So significant that it doesn't eliminate anyone or close in on anyone.

    Then, they're trying to tap dance around the "are you sure" it's pineapple. Yes, it's pineapple!

    Burke told the GJ he owned Hi-Tecs?! But Patsy can't remember buying Burke shoes with COMPASSES on them (she buys him so many shoes, you know)

    BRUCE:
    11:46:57;14 Mrs. Ramsey, I have scientific evidence from forensic scientists that say that there's
    fibers in the paint tray that match your red
    jacket. I have no evidence from any
    scientist to suggest that those fibers are
    from any source other than your red jacket

    When asking Patsy if there could be an explanation of the red fibers being found in the paint tray - Wood won't let her answer. He wants to see the scientific evidence and what other sources were compared.
    IMO -

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    741
    "What is interesting is that she says she hasn't got the time to go back and verify the tapes against the transcript!"

    LOL LOL LOL LOL
    This is my opinion only
    This post may not be copied to any other forum

    God Bless America

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,058
    Originally posted by Jayelles
    What is interesting is that she says she hasn't got the time to go back and verify the tapes against the transcript!
    Is it any surprise that the pathological liar always leaves hirself a way out of the BS she spews? As Lou says, "we SEEN it all before"...

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast