1286 users online (189 members and 1097 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1

    Full DNA Profile

    it has come to my attention that some rdi folks are so ingrained in their prior beliefs that they are unable to comprehend new information.

    well, for those who missed it,

    *they now have a full dna profile of the person who left foreign dna in jbr's blood*

    it is not the same old partial dna match.

    bpd didn't bother to check the second blood drop. when tested, it yielded a full dna profile that matched, in every way possible given the sampe limitation, the dna under jbr's fingernails and, apparently, dnax - found several feet from jbr's body.

    After a murder investigation that went nowhere, the answer to the question, "Who killed JonBenet," is likely in the Denver police department crime lab.

    "I believe the technology of today makes it extraordinarily difficult for a killer not to leave his calling card," says police forensic specialist Greg LaBerge, referring to the suspect's complete DNA profile.

    He believes he has the DNA for the man he suspects is the killer of JonBenet Ramsey: "It would be very, very helpful to the investigation to have that DNA matched to an individual."

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in661569.shtml

    After a murder investigation that went nowhere, the answer to the question, "Who killed JonBenet," is likely in the Denver police department crime lab.

    "I believe the technology of today makes it extraordinarily difficult for a killer not to leave his calling card," says police forensic specialist Greg LaBerge, referring to the suspect's complete DNA profile.

    He believes he has the DNA for the man he suspects is the killer of JonBenet Ramsey: "It would be very, very helpful to the investigation to have that DNA matched to an individual."

    The crime lab has two spots of JonBenet's blood found on the underwear she was wearing the night of the murder. Mixed in with that blood is the DNA of an unknown person. It has taken years to isolate, but forensic scientists in Colorado now have a complete DNA profile of the killer. They know the killer is a male. What they don't know is his name.

    --------------------------

    don't let your current paradigm filter out key information that may render your povs obsolete.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389

    Please..

    Are you saying that we've to suddenly take the media's word as gospel? That they are the authorities in the Ramsey case?

    Tom Bennett felt so strongly about the misinformation which has been put out recently that he felt obliged to break his 2 hyear silence and speak out to say:-

    no new evidence
    no breakthrough
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    Are you saying that we've to suddenly take the media's word as gospel? That they are the authorities in the Ramsey case?

    Tom Bennett felt so strongly about the misinformation which has been put out recently that he felt obliged to break his 2 hyear silence and speak out to say:-

    no new evidence
    no breakthrough
    when you have to run from the evidence, your pov may well be faulty.

    48 hours put up the guy responsible for the testng of this dna on their show.

    the level of conspiracy required to make this guy hired by the bda to be actively lying to public is pretty steep.

    only the bpd can get away with misleading statements and lies. -lol-

    run, run, run as fast as you can - but the truth never gets tired.

    the irony is that you likely still believe the burke tape nonsense - even after it has been proven factually false?

    right??? -lol-

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    Are you saying that we've to suddenly take the media's word as gospel? That they are the authorities in the Ramsey case?

    Tom Bennett felt so strongly about the misinformation which has been put out recently that he felt obliged to break his 2 hyear silence and speak out to say:-

    no new evidence
    no breakthrough
    show me where bennett said "no new evidence."

    cite your source.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    *they now have a full dna profile of the person who left foreign dna in jbr's blood*
    Your information is WRONG (again).

    If you want to spread Ramsey propaganda, the least you should do is get your story straight with the official Ramsey spin machine:

    From: www.supportramsey.com
    "On December 11th, 2003, the family was advised by the D.A.'s investigative team that the Denver Police Department DNA lab had successfully identified the 10th DNA marker from the blood samples found on the underwear of JonBenét."


    TEN markers does NOT make a complete DNA profile.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by aRnd2it
    Your information is WRONG (again).

    If you want to spread Ramsey propaganda, the least you should do is get your story straight with the official Ramsey spin machine:

    From: www.supportramsey.com
    "On December 11th, 2003, the family was advised by the D.A.'s investigative team that the Denver Police Department DNA lab had successfully identified the 10th DNA marker from the blood samples found on the underwear of JonBenét."

    TEN markers does NOT make a complete DNA profile.
    you've not proved that the full dna profile wasn't made whole after 12/11/03.

    the irony is you quote the ramseys as a better source than the guy who actually did the dna testing for the bda...

    so, you trust the ramseys as a source now? -lol-

  7. #7
    when bennett was talking about old information, he was talking about the idea that the dna now magically excludes the ramseys.

    that was the context.

    some folks will try and extend the context where bennett didn't apply it.

    a full dna profile is "new evidence."

    has any public official disuted the full dna profile claim since the time of the show?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    show me where bennett said "no new evidence."

    cite your source.
    You're right, that wasn't Bennett, that was mary keenan:-

    http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/g...?storyid=29501
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    you've not proved that the full dna profile wasn't made whole after 12/11/03.

    the irony is you quote the ramseys as a better source than the guy who actually did the dna testing for the bda...

    so, you trust the ramseys as a source now? -lol-
    this is good... -lol- some more...

    if it is proven another guy killed jbr, it will be a lot of fun to find out who the rdi people blame for their grave error in rational thinking ability.

    my guess is that steve thomas gets tossed where he belongs - under the bus.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Jayelles
    You're right, that wasn't Bennett, that was mary keenan:-

    http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/g...?storyid=29501
    from the article...

    A year ago, Boulder County District Attorney Mary Keenan issued a statement saying the weight of the evidence was more consistent with an intruder killing JonBenet than the Ramseys committing the crime.

    ;-)

    Keenan could not be reached for comment on the latest report. But she said earlier this month she doubted the report would explore any new evidence.

    this was said prior to the airing of the show. it was a guess on her part that you misapply as a factual statement. that is amateur at best.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    it was a guess on her part that you misapply as a factual statement. that is amateur at best.
    As I AM an amateur (never professed to be anything else), I thank you for saying that I am amateur at best. I'll take that as a compliment.
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    has any public official disuted the full dna profile claim since the time of the show?
    You need to look up the expression "an argument from silence", and then come back here when you fully understand what it means...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by aRnd2it
    You need to look up the expression "an argument from silence", and then come back here when you fully understand what it means...
    Yes, if we're going to start taking silence/no comment from officials as affirmation, then what does that say about all the "BORG" stories in the press?
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

  14. #14
    jayelles, ok, at least i know you are ok with spinning something out of context.

    bottom line is that when evidence is so sparce, as it is in this case, the presumption of guilt is wrong and unethical.

    i'm not claiming this evidence is factually true - i don't know. i am saying that if it is true as reported, a non ramsey was involved in this crime and it is unreasonable to believe a non ramsey wasn't involved.

    i'm open to evidence saying it is false.

    i'm not open to throwing out nonsense theories that could be factually impossible - and likely are.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,389
    Quote Originally Posted by My Take
    jayelles, ok, at least i know you are ok with spinning something out of context.

    .
    eh? Not sure what you mean by this.
    This is only my opinion

    Let the focus be on Madeleine




    Together we can make a difference





    Alert Viewer in Scotland

    Member of Websleuths since April 2000

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast