Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 90 of 186
  1. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    (apologies in advance for the length of this post, there's just a LOT to cover)..

    I can only say for sure that nobody really knows the truth. But there's a lot of information available now, such as autopsy reports that state none of the victims had any kind of alcohol or drugs in their systems. John and Dana are said to have to smoked pot occasionally, and John drank (Dana might've but he wasn't supposed to, nor could he have drank much if he did - he was a severe diabetic). Sue Sharp used to drink, but at the time of the murders had quit entirely. There's strong indication that Sue was not involved with drugs at all, nor did she socialise with a lot of drug users.

    So, therefore I'm inclined to believe that IF drugs were the true motive, then it was because John and Dana had been blamed for stealing some, or had come to know too much about a serious drug trafficking ring in the area (ie, not a couple of college kids selling baggies of pot to the locals, more like heroin and cocaine trade).

    That's a big IF, though. The motive in this crime is not only hard to guess at but so covered by layers of BS and obfuscation that just thinking through it all is a total headache.


    For example, there's a lot of evidence to suggest that perhaps Boubede was afforded some kind of immunity from proper prosecution of several serious crimes in his past.

    And after the murders, Boubede carried on with various fake-advertising scams he'd been pulling for years across several states. He ripped members of the police force off for $125,000 in 1988, while posing as retired police chief 'Michael Desantis'. He was caught red-handed in an elaborate sting operation, was prosecuted under that bogus Desantis name (though the Chicago police fully knew who he was, due to his extensive record and the fact he'd used that name before) and never did any time for it, according to a member of his family.

    In another interesting twist, it was noted by police in Keddie, 1981, that his other fake ID used in these scams, "Bobby Lake", was a membership card for The National Police Officers Association of America, for which he claimed to work selling advertising. It was signed by one "Frank Schira".

    Boubede claimed the ID was the property of a former employee of the Association's magazine that had been handed to him, and he'd simply forgotten about it.

    Mind you, Boubede also told the CADOJ agents after the murders that he was a former policeman who'd been shot in the line of duty, and had been retired for many years, after serving 18 years on the force - in Chicago. Working on the dates he gave, we deduced that Boubede would have been 8 years old when he "joined the force", a simple and obvious bit of arithmetic that might have explained this blatant discrepancy to the two experienced agents who were probably around Boubede's own age...

    Now, it turns out that despite newspapers reporting that the Police Officer's Association mag that Boubede used as a front for his scams was a 'fictional' magazine, it really existed. And it was, indeed, run by a man named "Frank Schira".

    So, on discovering this, I assumed the real "Bobby Lake" had his ID card stolen. But then I looked a little deeper into Frank Schira and the Association. I found articles like this:

    From the Sarasota Journal, 1973

    And this report, in which one can see Schira covering his ass with both hands while ratting out his long-time business partner.

    So it turns out that this Police Association was a money-making racket run by a bunch of cops. And that Boubede was actually using a police-created scam to scam the police.

    We're yet to discover whether the "Bobby Lake" ID bearing Schira's signature ever really existed. Of course, the signature could also be a fake. There is, however, ample reason IMO to suspect that maybe there's a whole lot more going there than meets the eye.

    But wait, there's more!

    It's curious that Boubede was not in prison when he died of heart failure just ten months after being arrested for this $125,000 scam against police. It's also curious that this was not the only time he skated - in the late 50's/early 60's he was out of jail in record time more than once - for some pretty darned serious crimes.

    For example, despite an extensive prior record for robbery and known associations with organised crime, Boubede was a free man just two years after being arrested for an armed bank robbery in which a police officer was shot (by Boubede's uncle and lifelong partner in crime, who got 30 years for the robbery and shooting - but died "of fright" in the courtroom minutes after being sentenced).

    It goes on and on -- you can find out more at the Keddie forum site. The upshot is, some (including me) believe it was no coincidence that a DoJ agent experienced in organised crime was called in, did an astoundingly (and way beyond credibly) terrible job at interviewing Boubede and Smartt, let them both waltz out of town and never followed them up properly as major suspects.

    As far as I can see, there's a pile of reason right there to suspect that the Keddie investigation was deliberately fudged, due to Boubede's involvement.

    Martin Smartt confessed to his therapist that he murdered Sue and Tina because he believed Sue was trying to get Marilyn (his wife at the time) to seek a divorce. Tina was killed, he said, because she was a witness and had seen too much. Smartt does not elaborate on how Tina's body ended up at Camp 18. He stated that he did not kill John or Dana but doesn't say who did kill them, or why.

    This confession was reported to PCSO in 1981. And Martin Smartt was never brought back in for questioning. He remained a free man, unhampered by any awkward questions about his blatant lies, his confession and his fingerprints at the crime scene for the rest of his life.

    Curiouser and curiouser.

    However, all of this only offers possible explanation for a why a confessed murderer was never arrested. It does not discount the possibility that Martin Smartt and Severin John Boubede (both known users of "uppers" and other drugs) were somehow led to believe that John and Dana ripped some drugs off. Boubede certainly had sufficient criminal contacts to have organised a large drug deal. Maybe somebody messed that up, and blamed the boys (who Marty already hated "with a passion", according to his ex-wife).

    In fact, Marty's ex-wife was the one person to openly benefit from the whole situation. She got rid of Marty -- who was abusive (he once pulled a gun on her and her kids, for example) and was known to stalk her and threaten her with death whenever she got the gumption to leave him (before taking him back..). Marilyn ended up in a live-in relationship with one of Marty's real good friends shortly after the murders. This would have been difficult, if not impossible, to achieve had Marty not been forced to skedaddle out of town on suspicion of a quad murder.

    "Coincidentally" Smartt was heard by a police officer some time after the murders, screaming at this former good friend in jail cell in Quincy (from which both were soon released, presumably both being there for minor things) - "Tell them where the dope is, Meeks!" - among various threats of dire bodily harm.

    I've been making posts regarding my thoughts on all that on the other forum, and won't reiterate them here.

    But yes, perhaps a 'drug deal gone wrong' was what set the rampage off - though I doubt anyone at cabin 28 had any hand in it. At this point, we just don't know for sure what the motive is and there's several good possibilities, but to me that one seems not at all unlikely.


  2. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Ausgirl For This Useful Post:


  3. #77
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,238
    Marty and Bo are dead-were they the main suspects?


  4. #78
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,238
    Ausgirl, thank you! I don't know if I stated how I first became interested in this case, but a few years ago, I worked for a show that was about haunted places. I found an article about the murders and immediately became intrigued. As part of my job, I was to research haunted places and try and package them to the producers to see if it was filmable. As there was no concrete proof of haunting, it was a no go, but the story never left me.



  5. #79
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    What a fascinating job, scriptgirl! I've worked in a related field, regarding haunted places. There's plenty of interesting (and very definitely haunted) places in Australia.

    I read posts on a blog from an occupant who lived in cabin 28 after the murders, in which they say their family had a lovely time in Keddie and nothing odd ever happened, while another claims her kids had night terrors and there was a 'creepy' feeling in some areas of the house. I am sorry the cabin was torn down, in a way, as it hampers research into the houses' dimensions etc., but also feel it's probably a good thing.

    The Sharp family and Dana Wingate are not forgotten, in any case.


  6. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Collingwood , Ontario
    Posts
    1,693
    This case really is one of the more fascinating cases . I can not imagine being the one to open the cabin door and see all of that and know you could have been there for me i don't know if i would ever sleep propper again in my life I don't think i could even handle something like that what an amazing woman she is to keep her life together after something like that . My only thought about motive is a sexuall one they or he or she whoever did this took the oldest girl for that reason .It made no sence when the guy in black said he asked marty why did he kill the girl and he said because she saw everything that doesn't mean you have to kidnap her the perp/perps could have done to her right there and then what they had done to the rest of the familly if it was just to keep her quiet because she witnessed it so i think they or he took her for a sexuall reason ...
    Everything I Write Is JMHO ..


  7. #81
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    The issue of why Tina (who was the younger girl, 12 years old) was removed to Feather Falls, and whether she was alive or dead at the time, is one of the more maddening aspects of the crime. There's so little evidence available..

    I agree, there's something 'not right' with Martin Smartt's confession - I haven't enough information to put my finger on what that is for sure but I have the feeling the confession was only made to open a path to a plea of insanity, just in case he ever -was- arrested for the crime. The therapist he confessed to was well aware of the various real mental issues Smartt had, as well as those he was concocting in order to get military benefits for PTSD (he was a cook in Vietnam..).

    There are those who firmly believe the murders were premeditated - I'm one of them - and I think the confession also would have helped Marty avoid murder 1, as it was made to seem a rash and impulsive act rather than something premeditated.

    The way the crime scene was staged - and it WAS staged, there's hard evidence for this - after the occupants were dead made it seem that a lot more violence went on there than I believe actually happened.

    What's odd is the police supported this fallacy by reporting that the house was trashed, there was blood all over the walls and stab marks on everything.. which just isn't true. Looking at the crime scene pictures, it's plain that only a few things were displaced - the TV was knocked askew. There's a cushion off the couch (the one under Dana's head). There's a maximum of seven knife marks in total on the walls, not dozens.

    Sue's 'defensive wounds' include a series of shallow, parallel cuts across the back of one hand. They all line up very neatly, which I have trouble seeing in the case of a woman fending off a knife attack.

    There's no doubt now that John and Dana's bodies were moved into position. Dana showed livor mortis on both sides of his body, for a start, so he was moved perhaps several hours after death. John's clothing is skewed in such a way as to suggest he was picked up and swivelled into position. The boys were tied together by the feet with a clean, white cord - how'd that not get bloody in a struggle, while the murders occurred? The knots also suggest strongly that the boys were tied while lying in position.

    As to Sue, we don't know for sure yet whether she was moved, or bound post-mortem but I suspect she was. Another oddity of police reportage - Sheriff Doug Thomas says she was found lying on the sofa, as does at least one other report. Yet she was found on the floor beside the sofa. I can't understand how anyone could make that mistake, even with the shock of such a brutal crime. Sue is very clearly shown to be on the --floor-- with the other victims in the CS pictures. Her daughter has confirmed that this is what she saw when she opened the door that morning.

    Sue was posed in a way that suggested a sexual motive - her clothing pulled up, underwear used as a gag - but she had not been raped.

    It's all so screwy. :s

    My question, ever since it became apparent that the CS was staged, has been: WHY? Why move the bodies at all? Why make Sue look like the target of a sexual crime (I currently don't believe it was one).

    Considering that the killers did stage the scene, I think it pays to look at what they were pointing away from, as well as what they were pointing toward.


  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ausgirl For This Useful Post:


  9. #82
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,238
    And yet no one heard anything...


  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to scriptgirl For This Useful Post:


  11. #83
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,238
    what is that area like now-is it a dangerous place or is it mellow? Do a lot of the suspect's family members still live there?


  12. #84
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,946
    Quote Originally Posted by AnaPhylaxis View Post
    Thanks for the info, Ausgirl. I'll check back in with the forums but I think I'll be doing far more reading than posting. Just a hinky feeling, but I believe there are still those who know far more than they admit who probably cruise through that site and check for updates. I'm no lightweight and "hang" at all the true crime/death sites, and no other forum has given me the feeling of being "watched" like the Keddie forums do. I do hope that I'm wrong, but I can't help but feel these crimes won't be officially "solved" for another 20 years, when all of the key players have passed away. It seems the ties to this horrific crime have tightly bound together any number of people still alive and active in the Quincy area, and I find that very frightening, even sitting at my computer a couple of hundred miles away.

    I am glad, however, that it wasn't just paranoia on my part about that "Craig" person. While he may have known two of the victims, etc., there was still something inherently "skeevy" about his entire persona that always made me feel like I needed a shower after reading his posts. I'm glad he's been banned and I hope somehow he gets the help he obviously needs.
    He was the main reason I gave up on that board he managed to cloud anything the posters might have had in the way of discussion and his ego tripping insistence on focusing attention away from the victims and on to his half baked stories of the good old bad days and drug drama of the mean streets of 1980's Keddie.(With him walking tall at center stage of course)
    Constantly alluding to 'more of the story' and cryptic comments that would make sense only if we possesed his insider knowledge as a 'player' back then."Please drag it out of me! " Pathetic.


  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kline For This Useful Post:



  14. #85
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    Hi guys,

    Kline, I agree. But he's gone now, thank goodness, and the board is managed well. People are focussing on what ought to be focussed on - the crime, and its victims.

    scriptgirl, none of the Sharp family still live there, but a lot of the people who were in Keddie and Quincy in '81 do. From everything I've heard, it never was a particularly dangerous area to live, compared to other parts of the state at the time. There'd been very few crimes all in all and nothing like cabin 28 (though the Kathy Howard and Lynnette Mollath murders are closely related, the were a decade apart and Lynette was in another county from what I can tell). People didn't even lock their doors in Keddie. These murders changed everything, made people afraid. It all but destroyed the resort as a community.

    Ana, I can understand that uneasy feeling. I'm 10,000 miles away and sometimes I feel like looking over my shoulder - I've had some really creepy 'warnings' about keeping my mouth shut. But you know? To hell with that. It only makes me digs harder, to see why they'd bother after all these years. I think a lot of folks there feel the same way. When it comes down to it, it's all hot air anyhow, a pile of bluster from folks who are ashamed of themselves, and really, ought to be.


  15. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ausgirl For This Useful Post:


  16. #86
    Hopeful One's Avatar
    Hopeful One is offline Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Nerd Town Central
    Posts
    12,229
    I am new to this case and fascinated by it. Anyone know if there is somewhere on the net I can watch the documentaries free?

    Justice for Travis


    Sometimes the first step towards forgiveness is understanding that the other person is a complete idiot.


  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hopeful One For This Useful Post:


  18. #87
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    There's free outtakes from the documentaries on youtube, you can find them most easily by searching 'keddie' there.

    The documentaries aren't available free. They're not expensive though, and delivery is pretty prompt now the backlog's been cleared a bit.

    Just to update: there's some more documents being released, and a few advances made as far figuring things out goes, LOTS of new questions. Sadly, not as many answers.

    There's been several calls for a push to have this case declared solved. A confession of guilt by one of the main suspects as well as a fingerprint on a bloody glass at the scene, the fact that his accomplice lied himself silly to the DoJ, and a pile of incidental evidence seems more than enough to at least get that much from PCSO.

    Sheriff Hagwood has publicly promised this case his attention, and every effort to see it solved at last. Will he live up to that promise? Or follow in the footsteps of the last six sheriffs and promise a lot but actually do very little?

    Somebody, a State's Attorney, somebody with enough clout, ought to investigate PCSO and CADOJ's investigation of this crime. To call it a travesty is being mild.


  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ausgirl For This Useful Post:


  20. #88
    Hopeful One's Avatar
    Hopeful One is offline Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Nerd Town Central
    Posts
    12,229
    Aus, thanks for the info!!

    As I said, I'm new to the case so I don't know all that much. You mention that there is a push to call the case solved. Do you believe that's the right thing to do? Wasn't it Marty who confessed and left a fingerprint? Do you think he's the one who did it?

    Justice for Travis


    Sometimes the first step towards forgiveness is understanding that the other person is a complete idiot.


  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Hopeful One For This Useful Post:


  22. #89
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,252
    Yep, Martin Smartt confessed to his therapist that he killed Sue and Tina Sharp, claiming his reason was that Sue was interfering his marriage, presumably talking to Marilyn Smartt about divorce. He was a violent and possessive abuser, and Marilyn often sought help over his abuse and ran from Marty several times but then he'd hunt her down, and she kept taking him back. He never mentions who killed Johnny Sharp or Dana Wingate.

    So that would seem a pretty straightforward motive - I have no doubt he murdered Sue & Tina, but there's something very off about the reason he gave. A lot of other women helped Marilyn out in far more active ways (giving her a place to stay, etc) and none of them were murdered (as far as we know).

    Marty's whole reason for confessing is dubious, imo. He was, from what I can tell with his violent nature and history of criminal behaviour, not the type to suffer a fit of remorse. I think he was setting himself up for an insanity defense in case he was busted - the therapist he was seeing was helping him with a (failed) claim to get military for PTSD he didn't have (Marty was a cook in the army, and never saw battle). And while getting busted was highly unlikely given the massive botch job the investigation ended up being, maybe he had reason to be worried at the time.

    ETA: re pushing for the case to be declared solved:

    It's a hard call. But I think it is the right thing to do. As things stand, no-one can get access to FBI files, etc, because the case is still open (despite the confession). Both main suspects are dead now, and as far as we can tell there's been no new leads in the case for three decades. And precious little effort to maintain files and evidence intact, let alone solve the case, from PCSO. If it was said to be solved, we could get access to files through FOIA that very well could bring new leads, so I think it would be worth it. And of course, perhaps it might give the Sharp and Wingate families a small (and very overdue) sense of closure.
    Last edited by Ausgirl; 01-12-2012 at 04:34 PM.


  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ausgirl For This Useful Post:


  24. #90
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    3,974

    Question A closer look at the setting

    This comes from the article Christine linked on the first page:
    "
    20 years ago, <snip> The murders ruined this northern Sierra mountain resort, a 3,205-foot- elevation enclave so popular people used to drive hundreds of miles just to eat at its log-walled lodge. In short order, appalled tourists began staying away in droves.
    >snip

    Twenty years ago, Keddie Resort was a placid getaway where you could rent one of 33 rustic cabins or a room in the hand-crafted, two-story lodge. The streams had great trout fishing, and pine-studded trails beckoned all around.
    The Keddie Lodge restaurant was packed most every night with customers who came from as far as San Francisco to dine on barbecued bear ribs, sherry- basted racoon steaks -- all shot locally -- and fine wines.
    "It was always a special, pretty place to go, a real draw," said Lawson.
    END QUOTE

    OK, here's my first set of questions: IF this lodge and resort restaurant serving exotic wild game and fine wines were so popular and people were renting the cabins, WHY was Glenna Sue living there with teenagers and possibly the toddlers?

    Where I come from, a resort cabin would have gone for around $80 a night in the 80's. I would expect much higher rates in CA.
    How did this woman have the money to live in a " resort cabin"? Did she work at the resort? Was she related to the owner?
    Was the financial situation of the Lodge maybe not as rosy as this article says?

    Since so much emphasis has been put on how the murders " ruined" the economy of not only the Lodge but the town of Keddie, I would like to know Glenna Sue's relationship to the crime scene first of all.

    Thanks!
    Maria
    Last edited by SeekingJana; 01-12-2012 at 04:46 PM.
    JUSTICE FOR CLO STONER IN 2015!!! http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...-March-17-2014
    This is about the murder of my friend, Clo Stoner, R.N. She was shot point blank in the head numerous times- defenseless, in the middle of the day, by her " boyfriend" in 2014- a victim of domestic violence. He also shot a second victim, Joanne Butler, of Tennessee, in the same way, and also her tiny dog in a carrier.
    Hopefully, Mark Montgomery's capital murder trial will start soon.



  25. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to SeekingJana For This Useful Post:



Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-23-2014, 09:09 AM
  2. GA GA - Wayne Williams - Atlanta Child Murders & more - 1979-1981
    By mysteriew in forum Serial Killers
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 04-14-2013, 02:17 PM
  3. CA CA - Wonderland murders of Los Angeles, 1981
    By Nyla4 in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-24-2012, 05:47 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2012, 07:52 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •