780 users online (70 members and 710 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 36 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 535
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,589

    IN - David Camm charged in murders of wife, 2 children, Georgetown

    Anyone watch this tonight??? Wadda ya think??/ I dunno seems like they have really slim evidence to me...he is going to get a new trial.......I dunno it's one thing for Scott to kill his child within his wife.s' body..but for this guy to kill his two kids....I dunno...hard to believe..but the first set of jurors certainly did.............

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    Yeah- just watched it..

    The blood spatter on his shirt and shoes seems to be the major piece of evidence. The motive? He molested his daughter and his wife found out~ game over. As a trooper his life was over anyway, he had nothing to lose at that point.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    430

    yup

    Quote Originally Posted by WordsofWisdom
    Yeah- just watched it..

    The blood spatter on his shirt and shoes seems to be the major piece of evidence. The motive? He molested his daughter and his wife found out~ game over. As a trooper his life was over anyway, he had nothing to lose at that point.
    No question --- hope they put him away for good next time -- so sad for the victim's family to have to go through it again -- interesting that the jurors had trouble believing he could kill his children even with all the evidence and the parade of affairs --
    secondo me - e' l'opinione mia...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    I did miss one thing though- can you fill me in?

    WHEN QUESTIONING A JUROR (WOMAN) SHE WAS AN NG IN THE BEGINNING- SOMETHING WAS SAID (BY THE DEFENDANT?) THAT PUSHED HER OVER THE LINE.. WHAT WAS IT?

    Sorry about the caps.. hit the wrong key- too lazy to change.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by WordsofWisdom
    I did miss one thing though- can you fill me in?

    WHEN QUESTIONING A JUROR (WOMAN) SHE WAS AN NG IN THE BEGINNING- SOMETHING WAS SAID (BY THE DEFENDANT?) THAT PUSHED HER OVER THE LINE.. WHAT WAS IT?

    Sorry about the caps.. hit the wrong key- too lazy to change.
    If you mean the middle-aged juror with the red-hair, she was actually convinced by another juror she trusted, who said they'd stake their own life and their own daughters life that Cam was guilty -- she gave in to guilty based on that.
    secondo me - e' l'opinione mia...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by cecilia
    If you mean the middle-aged juror with the red-hair, she was actually convinced by another juror she trusted, who said they'd stake their own life and their own daughters life that Cam was guilty -- she gave in to guilty based on that.
    Yeah..that's the ticket!
    Thanks!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,589
    Yeah but you are assuming that he did molest the girl yet they said he would have molested her just before he killed her.....I guess if the wife caught him??? but didn't seem to be enough time ...and if she suspected it before why not show something to the family that there was something troubling her........I dunno...yet the basketball players all said he skipped one of the games...sounds like he set the whole thing up.............

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,126
    Quote Originally Posted by smellsarat
    Anyone watch this tonight??? Wadda ya think??/ I dunno seems like they have really slim evidence to me...he is going to get a new trial.......I dunno it's one thing for Scott to kill his child within his wife.s' body..but for this guy to kill his two kids....I dunno...hard to believe..but the first set of jurors certainly did.............
    I watched it. Slim evidence? The little girl had defintely been molested and the defense wants all of that expunged from the next trial.. And the one hour descrepancy because of the time zone? And as with Peterson, who else could have done it.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,589
    Quote Originally Posted by yadler
    I watched it. Slim evidence? The little girl had defintely been molested and the defense wants all of that expunged from the next trial.. And the one hour descrepancy because of the time zone? And as with Peterson, who else could have done it.
    Was it proven that he molested the child???

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,126
    Quote Originally Posted by smellsarat
    Was it proven that he molested the child???
    What do you mean by "proven?" It was the medical examiner's sworn testimony at trial.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by smellsarat
    Was it proven that he molested the child???
    The child was molested in my opinion- based on what I heard on this show.
    The child was of an age where she would have limited social engagements- or at least not without her parents KNOWING who she had been with- if not with them. The child was old enough to tell someone, and perhaps she did.

    Is the Defense saying that she wasn't molested?
    Or are they just saying that HE didn't molest her?
    I may have missed that part.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    2,126
    At the conclusion of the TV show, it was stated that the defense wants the molestation of the daughter kept out of the second trial. That just about says it all as far as I am concerned.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by yadler
    At the conclusion of the TV show, it was stated that the defense wants the molestation of the daughter kept out of the second trial. That just about says it all as far as I am concerned.
    Even though it wasn't proven that HE molested the child, I agree with Yadler...it certainly takes it to the Probable side.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    10,589
    What I am asking is if it was proven that HE alone was the molester...they said she would have had to be molested just before she was killed............

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    4,127
    Quote Originally Posted by smellsarat
    What I am asking is if it was proven that HE alone was the molester...they said she would have had to be molested just before she was killed............
    I don't think they did prove that.
    But didn't the Coroner say that it could have been HOURS before?
    PLUS the grandmother said she had noticed this before.

Page 1 of 36 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY MN - Svetlana Munt, 32, shot to death in a Mankato park, 28 March 2010
    By Chica in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-27-2015, 01:48 PM
  2. Routier case is the first for David Camm
    By TellTheTruth in forum Darlie Routier
    Replies: 101
    Last Post: 09-10-2015, 11:15 AM
  3. GUILTY NY - Karelin, 34, & Halle Zacher, 4, murdered, Greece, 8 April 2005
    By sharon25 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-22-2015, 01:29 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-29-2010, 05:37 AM
  5. MO - Kelli Alexander, 35, & April Wheeler, 29, shot to death, 25 Feb 2005
    By PrayersForMaura in forum Crimes in the News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2005, 03:35 PM

Tags for this Thread