740 users online (138 members and 602 guests)  


Websleuths News

View Poll Results: Do you think Maddie is Alive or Not?

Voters
357. You may not vote on this poll
  • alive

    12 3.36%
  • Not

    46 12.89%
  • Alive and parents innocent

    33 9.24%
  • Dead and parents not innocent

    166 46.50%
  • Don't know

    37 10.36%
  • Dead and parents are innocent

    63 17.65%

Page 51 of 51 FirstFirst ... 41 49 50 51
Results 751 to 762 of 762
  1. #751
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,906
    Quote Originally Posted by haden View Post
    No, that was only few months ago that SY said this.

    The cadaver dog evidence was discounted long before this.

    Scotland Yard has looked at everything and is still persuading their leads.

    Looking at the parents is the first thing the UK police does, they passed that level long ago !
    they have to eliminate every other possibility too that's the way police work is done they have to investigate leads.

    Otherwise suffer the screams of " rush to judgement"






    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free


    Nosy by Nature and a Websleuther by choice

  2. #752
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Jmoose View Post
    I think it is their responsibilty to treat this disappearance as if she is still alive-I am having a really difficult time imagining her as a sex slave in some ring of pedophiles, though-it makes me sick that I just typed that. I don't have high hopes that they will solve the case. It's difficult enough in your own country, but because another county's laws come into play, it makes it more complicated. Plus, it seems that the Portuguese are focused on the McCanns as culprit, while in England it seems that people are more likely to blame an unknown abductor-making cooperation a little questionable.
    IMO the Portuguese got it right.

    SY has found nothing new. IMO nothing noteworthy. Nothing earth shattering and certainly nothing's been produced to eliminate the McCann's as viable suspects.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free


    Nosy by Nature and a Websleuther by choice

  3. #753
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    566
    For me she is alive until some formal body pronounce her dead and this would be after the proper SY investigation..

  4. #754
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,994
    Quote Originally Posted by haden View Post
    Only recently SY said there was a big possibility she might be alive.
    The cops often say that-who knows what they really think. They have an obligation to investigate

  5. #755
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by Jmoose View Post
    The cops often say that-who knows what they really think. They have an obligation to investigate
    Well, they seem quite passionate.
    Unlike the other force which stayed in restaurants watching the SKY news

  6. #756
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas Prairie
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by SapphireSteel View Post
    It always amazes me when someone argues their POV passionately and persistently then turns around and says "well I better read the facts".

    Isn't that part of sleuthing? Folks cant read everything but the basic skeleton of fact/inaccuracies remains the same, and were available to everyone to read.

    Nothing was new on Crimewatch. The only thing that was new was the McCanns story has been illustrated as LIES....oops sorry they were "mistaken".

    I am always open to finding something new or looking at data from a different way. I also consider evidence proved or discredited, and not only what happened at the time, but the results of all of that during the last six years. That's called being open minded.

    I didn't write that I'd "better read the facts." Simply reviewing the facts to see if there was something new, now with Tanners sighting being explained.

    People who respond to posts rudely and with condescending, insulting remarks don't do anyone any good. Please ignore my opinions if I am so annoying.
    Can't we all just get along? ~ Rodney King

  7. #757
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas Prairie
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by blefuscu View Post
    When was the cadaver dog evidence discounted, link please.
    Madeleine DNA samples too degraded for proper analysisfficeffice" />>>
    http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/news/article_1378439.php/McCanns_Madeleine_DNA_samples_too_degraded_for_pro per_analysis_-_police >>
    >>
    McCann DNA evidence 'exaggerated'>>
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7541810.stm
    >>
    >>
    Can't we all just get along? ~ Rodney King

  8. #758
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Inana View Post
    The article states the science isn't good enough to positively identify who. That was never the dogs job. The dogs did their job.

    Perhaps now the science has improved to the point of positive identification? Maybe they should try again.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free


    Nosy by Nature and a Websleuther by choice

  9. #759
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    299
    Quote Originally Posted by Linda7NJ View Post
    IMO the Portuguese got it right.

    SY has found nothing new. IMO nothing noteworthy. Nothing earth shattering and certainly nothing's been produced to eliminate the McCann's as viable suspects.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
    lol, they are even using the old E Fits, that the Motodo 3 did in 2008 so hardly doing much work are they.

    The trawled through pages of stuff from the Portugese police, and then finally found the part about Tanners sighting being descredited years ago as someone carrying their child to the creche or from the creche...so they have used that.

    The PJ gave up in the end because they got no where and got no help by the McCanns, because the next step really was to do a PROPER RECONSTRUCTION USING the actual players not actors.

    We have had sooooooooooooooooo many investigators and so many appeals, and we get loads of phone calls, and never moves forward.

    The child being removed was never seen, no clues NOTHING, so really nothing to go on.

    The E fits of the man seeing carrying the child was shown in 2008.

    I think logically. Logically you dont go into an apartment with the risk of being caught and take a child out in the early evening. IF you did you would have a car ready...not walk through a busy little town even in the winter it seemed busy with sightings and people toing and froing from the tapas every 15 minutes lol.

  10. #760
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    6,786
    Logically you don't go in through an unlocked door and out again (with child) through a closed window.

    Logically you don't leave tiny children alone while you go out on the booze night after night (don't tell me Kate eats because I don't believe you ).

    Logic...

    Logic tells me that if it looks like Gerry, and walks like Gerry, it probably is Gerry.

    Everything I post is my opinion only, can change at any time, and is not intended to replace fact.
    Critical Thinking is often criticised.
    KISS


  11. #761
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by SapphireSteel View Post

    Logic tells me that if it looks like Gerry, and walks like Gerry, it probably is Gerry.

    Maybe he's got a twin brother because at the time of the Smiths sighting he was elsewhere and Scotland Yard would check this inside out before anything else..

  12. #762
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas Prairie
    Posts
    503
    Quote Originally Posted by Linda7NJ View Post
    The article states the science isn't good enough to positively identify who. That was never the dogs job. The dogs did their job.

    Perhaps now the science has improved to the point of positive identification? Maybe they should try again.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

    low copy number (LCN) dna testing IS the cutting edge technology in dna analysis. It is only used in the UK and New Zealand; the United States does not consider it reliable because of the manipulation of the dna components and extreme probability of contamination.

    The dogs were not wrong, they alerted where dna was found. The human interpretation of what those alerts represented was the problem.

    Even if there WAS a more recent scientific test available, LCN dna testing is a destructive test, meaning that the testing destroys the sample, and since there was only miniscule cells to identify in the first place, none can be saved for confirmation later--another reason the U.S. doesn't use it. The results can not be verified to a standard or reproduced.
    Can't we all just get along? ~ Rodney King

Page 51 of 51 FirstFirst ... 41 49 50 51


Similar Threads

  1. Declared dead-but was alive
    By PFF in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2014, 03:34 PM
  2. Not sure Caylee is dead, Not sure she's alive
    By unsaid in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 05:31 PM