1281 users online (185 members and 1096 guests)  


Websleuths News

View Poll Results: Will the Long Island Serial Killer ever be caught?

Voters
302. You may not vote on this poll
  • YES.

    128 42.38%
  • NO.

    97 32.12%
  • NOT SURE.

    77 25.50%

Page 2 of 64 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 948
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,688
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,531
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkshaw View Post
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.
    That makes it more realistic that someone knows who it is.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,569
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkshaw View Post
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.
    And other people believe there is a sinister secret organization killing girls for whatever reason, even though all the evidence so far points to an SK and none points at a sinister organization.

    But, history teaches us that a lone SK is far more likely than a sinister organization. So, I'll go with the SK theory.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,531
    Quote Originally Posted by Tugela View Post
    And other people believe there is a sinister secret organization killing girls for whatever reason, even though all the evidence so far points to an SK and none points at a sinister organization.

    But, history teaches us that a lone SK is far more likely than a sinister organization. So, I'll go with the SK theory.
    He said SOMEONE.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,569
    He said "someone in the organization "

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1,688
    What the heck do I know what is behind this. I have been saying this for a very long time now. Sinister? organization? I never claimed to be a professor of English.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    a bad girl state
    Posts
    547
    Hawk,
    David Middleton was a sinister sk in "the organization" (another one) that literally got away with murder. For awhile. It happens. I don't think your theory is so far off at all.
    "Emotions have taught mankind to reason."
    Vauvenargues, Marquis De

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Forest Dweller.
    Posts
    10,720
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkshaw View Post
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.
    I agree with you regarding Manorville. But I think the GB4 are the work of 1 person acting alone (quite possibly the same person who did AC).

    JMO
    People seldom do what they believe in. They do what is convenient, then repent. ~ Bob Dylan

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    135
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkshaw View Post
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.
    If it was an organization how come strangulation was the cause of death? That is not a mafia style or organizational style crime. Easiest thing for them is a bullet to the back of the head. I mean if you have the girls in a vulnerable state where you can strangle them you most certainly could put a bullet in them.

    If it is an organization then the killer(s) will be caught. Because even though crime organizations pride themselves on taking an oath of loyalty there is always a rat trying to save their own ass.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    a bad girl state
    Posts
    547
    On the case,
    I've heard LE. being referred to as "The organization" before.
    I think that is what Hawk was referring to as well. The LE organization.
    "Emotions have taught mankind to reason."
    Vauvenargues, Marquis De


  11. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    a bad girl state
    Posts
    547
    I attended a few seminars on White Collar Crime (Trusted Criminals) and also a few courses.
    I had studied a bit on Russian Organized Crime and there is a term in russian (the term escapes me at the moment) that refers to getting members into positions of trust in the Government, LE, etc. Morality aside, it's a pretty intelligent strategy. I'm sure russian organized crime does not have the monopoly on this very effective strategy. Be careful who you elect in your government.
    "Emotions have taught mankind to reason."
    Vauvenargues, Marquis De

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,531
    Quote Originally Posted by hawkshaw View Post
    It seems as though most of you folks still believe a serial killer is on the loose. I have always swayed to the idea these gals were not killed by a Bundy or Rifkin type, but from someone in the organization that had no use for them for whatever reasons. The GB4 got to Oak Beach, either dead or alive. SG got there alive and she wound up dead.
    That would make him a different breed of serial killer. The kind that called a young teen to mentally torture her. Im sure in his personal life he outwardly abuses people verbally and physically. If this coward is ever arrested I dont think the neighbors will say hes was such a nice guy.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    1,358
    I lean towards multiple killers. 2 to be exact.

    Like in all professions, hobbies, passions we get comfortable and sloppy as we get older and more experienced. As you get experienced you get on "auto-pilot" as I call it. When you are on auto pilot you make a mistake because a situation does not fit your auto pilot mold. Now when you are younger, you pick up on these mistakes and fix them. WHen you are older you are not as sharp. You miss your own mistakes.

    That is where someone gets caught.

    The best way to get away with murder is to not have a motive.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    279
    I say no to organized crime specifically because these killings have a signature and are up close and personal (strangulation).

    I think he'll be caught. He lives a high risk lifestyle and upped the ante by calling the families of his victims. This is a person who is bound to slip up. And if he's managed to stop killing -doesn't seem likely- I suspect there's a mistake he's made that's either yet to be discovered, or has already been discovered, but not publicly revealed.

    Perhaps the police have already talked to him or have him on their radar. That seems to be common in a lot of these cases before an arrest is eventually made.

    Still. They should bring in the FBI.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    a bad girl state
    Posts
    547
    I just had this profound thought while burning my husband's dinner.
    We pretty much concluded that the guy who taunted Melissa's little sister is pretty twisted.
    Twisted to the point of falling into the sadistic category. If he is the sob who killed or played some part in killing Melissa and the others we can say he is a sadistic sexual psychopath. now, according to shadowwraths and others research (feel free to correct me PB.) Sadistic sexual psychopaths aren't very nice people. yeah, they can fake it for a little while, but they tend to be narcissistic loners and this wouldn't surprise me because who the hell wants to be friends with a narcicist? unless he is a drug dealer. I too think there is more than one.


    Also, is there anyway to back track the money these victims put in their checking accts?z
    "Emotions have taught mankind to reason."
    Vauvenargues, Marquis De

Page 2 of 64 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Article: Police ID Long Island Serial Killer
    By Reannan in forum Long Island Serial Killer
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-13-2016, 11:50 PM
  2. Websleuths Radio Sun. 3-4-12 *Long Island Serial Killer*
    By Tricia in forum News, TV & Radio related to LISK (excluding TKS)
    Replies: 190
    Last Post: 03-07-2012, 07:12 PM
  3. 2012.03.04 - The Long Island Serial Killer case
    By Kimster in forum Websleuths Radio
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-04-2012, 08:21 PM