believe09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 28,094
- Reaction score
- 516
AUSA Sam Ponder has some very specific thoughts on the criteria for a drug deal or at a minimum some kind of criminal malfeasance:
The case itself was appealed to the Supreme Court, in part because the defendant believed the question and the attitude denied him the right to a fair trial. The Supreme Court rejected the case, but Sotomayor took the unusual step of addressing this part of the transcript and the prosecutor who made the comment:While questioning an African-American defendant in a drug case, Ponder asked: "You've got African-Americans, you've got Hispanics, you've got a bag full of money. Does that tell you - a light bulb doesn't go off in your head and say, this is a drug deal?"
LINK HERESotomayor wrote that the prosecutor had "tapped a deep and sorry vein of racial prejudice that has run through the history of criminal justice in our nation." The question was "pernicious in its attempt to substitute racial stereotype for evidence," she added.