1174 users online (200 members and 974 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,003

    Burke did it

    I haven't said that in a long time and I'm still sticking with the theory.
    how old is he now anyway?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,053
    Quote Originally Posted by alexia
    I haven't said that in a long time and I'm still sticking with the theory.
    how old is he now anyway?

    alexia,

    Burke turned 18 on January 26, 2005. He's an adult now, and it's time for certain posters to get off this "innocent little boy" routine when his name comes up.

    Burke is involved somehow in the death of JonBenet or the parents wouldn't be lying, dragging their feet in regard to the investigation, and covering up to protect him.

    It's time for Burke to be re-questioned and perhaps be given a polygraph examination.

    BlueCrab

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,315
    Quote Originally Posted by BlueCrab
    alexia,

    Burke turned 18 on January 26, 2005. He's an adult now, and it's time for certain posters to get off this "innocent little boy" routine when his name comes up.

    Burke is involved somehow in the death of JonBenet or the parents wouldn't be lying, dragging their feet in regard to the investigation, and covering up to protect him.

    It's time for Burke to be re-questioned and perhaps be given a polygraph examination.

    BlueCrab
    Blue Crab,

    I agree. If not polygraphed, he's at the very least fair game for a sharp query from an investigative reporter. And they'll turn up sooner or later.

    IMO

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Daisey
    Blue Crab,

    I agree. If not polygraphed, he's at the very least fair game for a sharp query from an investigative reporter. And they'll turn up sooner or later.

    IMO
    Yep.

    The sooner the better.

    Blue Crab, can you answer my Q's about Burke on the other thread? (ie medication, psychiatrist etc.?)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    14
    I used to think that Burke had something to do with Jonbenet's murder.Some of my theories were that a)Burke molested Jonbenet while they were playing together. b)Burke was playing with the garotte and applied it to Jonbenet,not really understanding what he was doing,or it was deliberate (apparently,Burke resented his sister,and didn't receive much attention from his parents,who were always focused on Jonbenet) c)Jonbenet and Burke got into a fight,things went too far,and the parents covered it up d)Jonbenet wet her bed,and went to her brothers bed like she sometimes did.He woke up,got angry and maybe hit her and knocked her out.

    Either way,if Burke was responsible,Patsy and John covered it up out of their own guilt for neglecting him,or because they wanted to keep him protected.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    355

    we wish you a merry christmas

    Quote Originally Posted by BlairAdele
    I used to think that Burke had something to do with Jonbenet's murder.Some of my theories were that a)Burke molested Jonbenet while they were playing together. b)Burke was playing with the garotte and applied it to Jonbenet,not really understanding what he was doing,or it was deliberate (apparently,Burke resented his sister,and didn't receive much attention from his parents,who were always focused on Jonbenet) c)Jonbenet and Burke got into a fight,things went too far,and the parents covered it up d)Jonbenet wet her bed,and went to her brothers bed like she sometimes did.He woke up,got angry and maybe hit her and knocked her out.

    Either way,if Burke was responsible,Patsy and John covered it up out of their own guilt for neglecting him,or because they wanted to keep him protected.

    Just thinkin': Do you think Burke was old enough (nearly 10) to know that roping his little sister around the neck was a dangerous thing to do and therefore a no-no? And, if he had done so, and she had tipped over unconscious, do you think he might have had the presence of mind to loosen the lariat so as to prevent her death by strangulation?

    Speaking of lariats, and off on a tangent, I recollect that one of JonBenet's numbers was the "cowboy sweetheart" thing where she dressed in western garb and wore a kerchief around her neck and danced, and sang, "I wanna be a..." Maybe some weirdo took her up on that proclamation/invitation.

    Look what we have here: the garotte--a lariat; the lariat--a kerchief around the neck. The victim--a pageant kid, crooning her heart's desire.

    Who was the weirdo (Oliva?) who exclaimed that in viewing that performance, he recognized that JonBenet was a child genius?

    Now, tell me folks, did you normal people see one ounce of genius in that performance? Talk about flawed perception. This guy isn't off the hook in my meat locker of suspects by any means.

    Back in orbit: It was christmastime, and fertile territory for arguments and altercations. Did JB wreck some project of Burke's; some toy model, or the like, that he'd received as an xmas gift? If so, did he fly off the handle, striking her with the nearest object he could lay hands on; the baseball bat? OK, what happened after that? Why was JB so soon after wearing her new synthetic nylon necklace? Maybe Burke just went berserk?

    Maybe....dunno. Is this theory supported by the evidence?

    Start with the dead girl with the nylon necklace and the cracked skull. That's what you're dealt when you find her. What do you add to make it look like the work of an intruder?

    Are we making progress?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    26,910
    Quote Originally Posted by alexia
    I haven't said that in a long time and I'm still sticking with the theory.

    PUHLEASE

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,599
    Quote Originally Posted by RedChief
    Back in orbit: It was christmastime, and fertile territory for arguments and altercations. Did JB wreck some project of Burke's; some toy model, or the like, that he'd received as an xmas gift? If so, did he fly off the handle, striking her with the nearest object he could lay hands on; the baseball bat? OK, what happened after that? Why was JB so soon after wearing her new synthetic nylon necklace? Maybe Burke just went berserk?

    Maybe....dunno. Is this theory supported by the evidence?

    Start with the dead girl with the nylon necklace and the cracked skull. That's what you're dealt when you find her. What do you add to make it look like the work of an intruder?

    Are we making progress?
    I'm starting with just the cracked skull here:

    I wonder if if the kids were playing after they returned home: B playing his new Nintendo 64 (maybe the friend was there with him and planning to go to Charlevoix with the family. Remember the bag of clothes by the door?) and JB doing whatever little girls do. Perhaps JB, in a bratty state, pulled the plug on his/their game or something similar. (My sons received a N-64 that very same year and it was serious business, let me tell ya.) Out of rage, he/the friend (you choose) picked up a baseball bat and whopped her with it--an almost dead child. Can you imagine the commotion in the house at that time? In order to not only protect B from questioning and the stigma attached to such an event, perhaps Patsy also wanted to protect him from himself; she did not want him to live out his life with the guilt associated with killing his sibling, and on Christmas of all times. Let the staging begin? If a friend were there, the parents were called and they came and picked up said friend.

    The next morning, B doesn't know what happened to his sister....someone broke in the house and took her? He knows that he/friend hurt her, but parents said she was okay; therefore, in his mind the kidnapping/murder was real. [Plus, when Patsy/John took the famous polygraphs, one of the questions was "do you know for sure..... That could tie in with a friend being there and them not knowing which child administered the fatal blow (they both hit her?).]

    Here, you have an accidentally dead child, and you know that her sibling will have to live with the guilt and stigma for the rest of his life. You yourself are in a state of shock and disbelief and grief, but your mission now is to protect what you still have. What do you do? Would you stage a kidnapping/murder/sexual assault to exonerate the sibling? Remember, you are saving him from himself more than anything. The next morning when he awakes, he is as clueless as a newborn chick. To this day, he would believe that an intruder came in, and that is the reason for the charade and bogus attempts at trying to find the killer--all for the sibling's benefit.

    Thus, the reason for the R's lifelong goal/mission of staying out of jail vs. finding the killer of their daughter. The PR campaign--necessary not only for their own reputations, but for what they are truly trying to protect at this time--B.

    Of course, this is just all "pretending". As RedChief says, are we making progress?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10
    Would you stage a kidnapping/murder/sexual assault to exonerate the sibling?

    Myself, I would Not. How can you stage a sexual assault of a 6YO and live with yourself for the rest of your days. Much less your own 6YO, in order to "save" your 9 YO. Doesn't fly to me.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,053
    John, Patsy, and Burke have been lying, obfuscating, refusing to fully cooperate with the investigation, and carrying out an obvious coverup to hide something -- and that something sure ain't an intruder. It has to be a Ramsey family member.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,053
    Quote Originally Posted by GuruJosh

    Blue Crab, can you answer my Q's about Burke on the other thread? (ie medication, psychiatrist etc.?)

    GuruJosh,

    Sorry, but I don't know the answers, other than Burke was seeing a psychiatrist during 1998.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    355
    Nehemiah,

    The bag of clothes: were they boys' clothes?

    Whopped her with the baseball bat: dont know about the friend; do you think Burke was strong enough to do that damage with a baseball bat? I guess I'm not convinced of that. Do you think she was struck toward the back of the head and from behind?

    "..an almost dead child.": yes, key word--almost; so why not request emergency assistance????? I think this is a BIG question. There is no stigma attached to hurting your sister in a fight (the accident), is there?

    "...guilt associated with killing his sibling..": Let's see...the child is almost dead (maybe looks dead to Burke?), but not quite, so the parent hustles Burke off to bed and finishes the job?? Maybe just a skosh hard to believe?

    If Burke had killed JonBenet with the blow (no doubt in anyone's mind at the scene), it's possible that the parents would lie about what happened; maybe even do a little staging; but, the nylon necklace [more later] and the vaginal injury is maybe a little bit too much? Why not just position her at the foot of the stairs and say she fell? They might even lie about what happened after calling for help, and before the child died (assuming she'd die before first aid could be rendered).

    [as promised] There were two things that killed her simultaneously: the head injury and the strangulation ligature. The ligature wasn't applied after she was dead. She was still alive when the ligature was applied. She was still alive when she was whacked on the head.

    The Ramseys (polygraph) were asked "Did you administer the injuries that resulted in JonBenet's death." and "Do you know who did administer the injuries that caused JonBenet's death?" Patsy was also asked about the ransom note, but not John: too weird! You could argue that since there were two life threatening injuries, if one had been administered by John and the other by Patsy, they could give a truthful "no" answer to both questions. These are not good questions. A better question would be: did you in any way participate in the events which led to the death of JonBenet?

    Is a 10-yr-old that easily duped?

    Just thinkin'.....
    Last edited by RedChief; 03-15-2005 at 12:47 PM. Reason: spelling

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,599

    Chief

    I'll have to look and find out about the clothes. From recollection (which could be flawed), they were kids' clothes in a paper bag somewhere near the door.

    Is a 9 yr old boy strong enough to inflict injury/death with a baseball bat? Most definitely. I've had three male 9 year old baseball players and they could do some real damage with a bat. No doubt whatsoever on that point.

    An almost dead child...we know from the autopsy that she might not have been dead...but to onlookers, that could be different. Why not call for help? Maybe they/she/he/it definitely thought she was dead. Maybe there was prior sexual abuse involved. Maybe the boy(s) strangled her in addition to whopping her on the head, thus the staged strangulation. Maybe the boy(s) stunned her first and then strangled her and whopped her on the head.

    Why not just position her at the foot of the stairs and say she fell? Maybe they had to cover for the strangulation, the stunning, the head blow. Maybe in a state of panic that's the first thing they thought about doing. Perhaps the simple appearance of an accident wouldn't fly and they knew it.

    There were two things that killed her simultaneously: the head injury and the strangulation ligature. The ligature wasn't applied after she was dead. She was still alive when the ligature was applied. She was still alive when she was whacked on the head. But to what degree was she alive? We don't know, do we? Would panicked family look at the situation at the time and know to what degree she was dead? Were the extra ponytails developed to hide an injury?

    Is a 10 yr old that easily duped? Definitely yes, by persons whom they trust.

    Just thinking here....and more and more questions.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    355

    what was that loud cracking sound I heard?

    Nehemiah,

    Do you think she was struck from behind, say, by a right-handed batter? Does it matter for the madder-than-hell-'cause-she-pulled-the-plug scenario?
    She may have been starting to run away. I'll defer to you on the power of the 9-yr-old. Thanks. He was almost ten, but rather a frail-looking chap, eh? John said it would have taken the power of a man; of course, we all know that John is highly trustworthy. (he may be, for all I know). One "expert" said that a blow sufficient to crack a skull like that would have made a noise that resounded throughout the house (I paraphrase). Maybe the batter could get by with it in the basement, especially the wine cellar with the door shut. A strange place to be playing Nintendo? Now, don't hit me; especially with a bat, unless it's a small brown bat that has been disemboweled.

    Yeah, the boy could have done all those things. We don't really know, do we. That's why it's important to know the boy. But, when the parents found her, if they found her, prior to 1 PM on the 26th, they should have called for help. Even when folks know the family member is dead, they call for an ambulance right away. Seems maybe a little questionable in some cases, but there is always that outside chance of reviving the seemingly dead person. They ain't daid 'til they's pronounced daid by an MD. Boy, you've thrown a lot of stuff in there! Even prior sexual abuse. This little high-liability woman is a walking dead girl. One little accident and, poof, she's eradicated.

    To what degree was she alive? To what degree is anyone alive at any given moment? Sometimes I have to pinch myself to convince myself that I'm alive. The point is that normal parents wouldn't take any chances; they'd call for help. The Ramseys weren't normal? You don't pitch your child into the garbage can that easily. One down, one to go.

    If the extra ponytails were fashioned to hide an injury, looks like it worked for a little while; even fooled the coroner. Some ponies have lots of tails, you know. Some even have horns sticking out of their foreheads.

    Are 10-yr-olds who are easily duped by their parents, apt to kill their sisters?

    My brain hurts....and I haven't been whopped yet, except by this case.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,599
    Heck, RedChief, I don't know! That's why I sit on the fence. I don't necessarily believe a thing I posted, except the part about nine year old boys being able to do sufficient harm with a baseball bat.

    Maybe by the time they found her, she was absotively deceased. Maybe all that needed to be done was the staging in the basement?

    Then again, maybe an intruder came in and did it all whilst the family slept soundly.

    One thing that I know that I know...is that the perp knew the grounds and the house well enough to get right inside and get out. The homes on that street are too close for someone to be wandering around and pandering at the windows and doors.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast