Blazeboy3
Inactive
page 132///... middle of paragraph:
"Lest we remain vexed by that question, Lawrence Schiller toward the end of a book scrupulous in it's effort to avoid conclusions about anything, even the most mundane matters, assures us that we can be sure of one thing:
NEITHER PATSY NOR JOHN EVER ASKED THE OTHER IF HE
OR SHE WERE THE MURDERER."26
[/page190...26...It is interesting that Schiller removes this paragraph from the paperback version of his book./] WHY???
ASK YOURSELF Why????
"Are we to imagine this question as one that never arose for either? Or once awake did it succumb to repression and the implicit faith of a perfect love? Imagine Patsy bearing such a question in silence? Or John, an iuntelligent and scrupulous man, remaining oblivious to the preponderance of inviting, however, because it give his audience a way to exorcise a troubling spectre, that of the parents in cahootos, one the killer of their child, the other compelled to prote3ct that killer. For that image leaves us with painful toughts about the family and what transpires there."
OK...REPEAT p. 132 An Evening With JonBenet By Walter Davis:
NEITHER PATSY NOR JOHN EVER ASKED THE OTHER IF HE
OR SHE WERE THE MURDERER. "26
[/page190...26...It is interesting that Schiller removes this paragraph from the paperback version of his book./] WHY???
ASK YOURSELF Why????
TO ME...THIS IS MAJOR...WHY WOULDN"T YOU GO THERE????
"Lest we remain vexed by that question, Lawrence Schiller toward the end of a book scrupulous in it's effort to avoid conclusions about anything, even the most mundane matters, assures us that we can be sure of one thing:
NEITHER PATSY NOR JOHN EVER ASKED THE OTHER IF HE
OR SHE WERE THE MURDERER."26
[/page190...26...It is interesting that Schiller removes this paragraph from the paperback version of his book./] WHY???
ASK YOURSELF Why????
"Are we to imagine this question as one that never arose for either? Or once awake did it succumb to repression and the implicit faith of a perfect love? Imagine Patsy bearing such a question in silence? Or John, an iuntelligent and scrupulous man, remaining oblivious to the preponderance of inviting, however, because it give his audience a way to exorcise a troubling spectre, that of the parents in cahootos, one the killer of their child, the other compelled to prote3ct that killer. For that image leaves us with painful toughts about the family and what transpires there."
OK...REPEAT p. 132 An Evening With JonBenet By Walter Davis:
NEITHER PATSY NOR JOHN EVER ASKED THE OTHER IF HE
OR SHE WERE THE MURDERER. "26
[/page190...26...It is interesting that Schiller removes this paragraph from the paperback version of his book./] WHY???
ASK YOURSELF Why????
TO ME...THIS IS MAJOR...WHY WOULDN"T YOU GO THERE????
:dontknow: