1449 users online (270 members and 1179 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 181
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    822

    address

    didnt FLEK have an address at 3146 hudnall St, Dallas? ( i think someone said it was on Ancestry?)

    if yes, then A. Laciner also had an address on hudnall, based on a unclaimed property file I found.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    492
    Quote Originally Posted by linda9681 View Post
    didnt flek have an address at 3146 hudnall st, dallas? ( i think someone said it was on ancestry?)

    if yes, then a. Laciner also had an address on hudnall, based on a unclaimed property file i found.

    originally posted by clairenc
    ancestry.com shows the following addresses for lori e. Kennedy with dob 7/18/69:

    3146 hudnall st., dallas, texas 75235
    14400 statler blvd, fort worth, tx 76155
    2436 harwood rd. Apt. 387, bedford, texas 76021
    this one comes back as a business when googled:
    Lori e. Kennedy (dob july 1969) 1111 w. Airport #147, irving, texas 75062 (phone number 355-0747)
    then it lists:
    200 bear creek dr. Apt. 219, euless, tx 76039 (1995)
    p.o. Box 543344 #219, dallas, tx 75354
    3901 oakridge ct. Apt. 3815, fort worth, tx 76155 (1993)
    p.o. Box 810, euless, texas 76039 (1995)
    great find!!!
    Eternally optimistic!

    Hoping to find:
    John Spira (Avatar picture of John)
    Bendetta "Beth" Bentley
    Tionda and Diamond Bradley

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    218
    Wow. those two Hudnall addresses are 400ft apart!

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by Linda9681 View Post
    didnt FLEK have an address at 3146 hudnall St, Dallas? ( i think someone said it was on Ancestry?)

    if yes, then A. Laciner also had an address on hudnall, based on a unclaimed property file I found.
    Yes, someone posted that info on the original thread..I know it is a lot to read through and not sure what got moved to the subforums, but you might want to read through the original post, save some research time.. I hate to see people spending time on what has already been posted

    That is what brought up so much interest in Laciner, the fact that the people lived so close..we found out the girl that lived at that address divorced in 1981, husband remarried, etc...

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    492
    Quote Originally Posted by kdsmith21 View Post
    Yes, someone posted that info on the original thread..I know it is a lot to read through and not sure what got moved to the subforums, but you might want to read through the original post, save some research time.. I hate to see people spending time on what has already been posted
    I read through all the posts and had missed/forgotten about this. So, it is good we have it sorted into this forum now where we can look at things based on topic and keep up with everything! Whew!
    Eternally optimistic!

    Hoping to find:
    John Spira (Avatar picture of John)
    Bendetta "Beth" Bentley
    Tionda and Diamond Bradley

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    822
    Yes I had read it too and forgot!! Well played FLEK! Well played! Sorry cause I know it is frustrating to RE hash stuff already solved. At least we know it was a real addy for the A laciner. He had lots of unclaimed property!! Can we post what Kim Werner did after the divorce? I can't find any marriage records for her or anything after, just poof!! Gone.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    492
    Quote Originally Posted by Linda9681 View Post
    Yes I had read it too and forgot!! Well played FLEK! Well played!
    OMG. That made me laugh.
    Eternally optimistic!

    Hoping to find:
    John Spira (Avatar picture of John)
    Bendetta "Beth" Bentley
    Tionda and Diamond Bradley

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,944
    So A. Laciner married LRC in 1991 in Denton, TX.

    I'm not finding anything at all on K. Laciner. Where did the divorce record show up? TIA

    ETA: Oh, nevermind, I found her.
    Last edited by neesaki; 07-17-2013 at 07:56 AM.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,944
    Hope this doesn't sound too cryptic, just not sure how much information I'm allowed to post here:

    According to People-Finders, the first listing under possible employment/ business assoc. for A. Laciner doesn't come up under corporationwiki.com. The business is apparently incorporated under another version of his name, (just take out the n), interesting. It's described as a computer software company.

    The 2nd listing under possible employment / business associations, comes up under corporationwiki.com showing him as the only associate, but is shown as inactive. I did google it and found a website by the same name minus the USA, which is a computer marketing / website design company.

    IIRC, this may be along the lines of the type of work that LEK had listed on her resume. Could she have worked for him at some point ?

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,944
    Rethinking, if he was one of her employer's I don't see it on her resume. Surely Mr. V would have already contacted all of these people though. Whatever the case it sure would be nice to know.


  11. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    411
    Quote Originally Posted by neesaki View Post
    The 2nd listing under possible employment / business associations, comes up under corporationwiki.com showing him as the only associate, but is shown as inactive. I did google it and found a website by the same name minus the USA, which is a computer marketing / website design company.

    IIRC, this may be along the lines of the type of work that LEK had listed on her resume. Could she have worked for him at some point ?
    I had mentioned this aspect in the old thread. One could assume that in his line of work....he could potentially have the ability and wherewithal to conceal digital foot prints and crumb trails which others may follow to unravel a potential mystery.

    Also....I found a Kim W. who is a dermatologist in Texas. Wasn't FLEK knee-deep in doing dermatological market studies? Maybe the pre-existing link was with the former Mrs. L and not Mr. L. I am quite confident that KWL has far more insight to FLEK's true identity than anyone else.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,944
    Quote Originally Posted by HerStory View Post
    I had mentioned this aspect in the old thread. One could assume that in his line of work....he could potentially have the ability and wherewithal to conceal digital foot prints and crumb trails which others may follow to unravel a potential mystery.

    Also....I found a Kim W. who is a dermatologist in Texas. Wasn't FLEK knee-deep in doing dermatological market studies? Maybe the pre-existing link was with the former Mrs. L and not Mr. L. I am quite confident that KWL has far more insight to FLEK's true identity than anyone else.
    Thanks, HerStory, I don't remember that from the first thread. Actually, it's all starting to run together, guess I need a system reboot, lol.

    I don't remember anything about dermatological market studies either and I just checked and didn't see that on her resume. That is an interesting finding though. IIRC, didn't someone say her name had changed? I don't know what it is, and suppose it can't be posted here. Another,

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    323
    I think most of the original posts have been transferred over to the first page of this Laciner thread..... so...I have a question.

    I was finally able to pull up the divorce from 1981 and at the top it states in 1982 "NON-SUIT/DISMISSAL BY PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER". Then below that "converted disposition". Now, does this mean an agreement was arranged and that divorce was granted and did not have to go into a trial? Or does it mean the original divorce petition was dropped? I am no legal expert, so just wondering what that status means. TIA!

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,944
    Quote Originally Posted by CindyTx View Post
    BINGO! But I cannot put it on here...

    Kim changed her name...she is the one I feel we should focus on.
    How / where did you find that she changed her name? All I'm coming up with is Laciner. TIA

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,989
    Quote Originally Posted by MrsTigglesworth View Post
    I think most of the original posts have been transferred over to the first page of this Laciner thread..... so...I have a question.

    I was finally able to pull up the divorce from 1981 and at the top it states in 1982 "NON-SUIT/DISMISSAL BY PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER". Then below that "converted disposition". Now, does this mean an agreement was arranged and that divorce was granted and did not have to go into a trial? Or does it mean the original divorce petition was dropped? I am no legal expert, so just wondering what that status means. TIA!
    I sent this info (with link to court case) to a WS member (verified atty) and it appears to her that they did not get divorced...at least not in that action. They many have filed something else in another case,later, or in another state.

Page 5 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast