1219 users online (218 members and 1001 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Segundo, California
    Posts
    7,859

    CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP11403, >60, hit by cars on I-5, Jan'91

    NamUs UP # 11403 https://identifyus.org/en/cases/11403

    Unidentified White Female

    Found January 03, 1991 at In Los Angeles, Los Angeles County CA

    Vital Statistics

    * Age: Over 60
    * Height: 64" (5 feet 4 inches)
    * Weight: 184
    * Hair Color: Grey
    * Scars & Marks: Transverse and paramedian longitudinal scars on lower abdomen

    Circumstances
    * Comments: On 1/3/1991 @ 0300 hours the decedent was walking on the S/B I-5 freeway when she was struck by multiple vehicles.

    Clothing and Accesories
    * Clothing: Purple & white robe (1) blue sock; red pajama bottoms; red & black underwear; white bra
    * Jewelry: 1 y/m band with clear stone; 1 w/m band; 1 beaded bracelet; 1 pair y/m earrings

    Identifiers
    * Dental: (No teeth, full set of dentures found with decedent)
    * DNA: Not Available
    * Fingerprints: Available (Sent to CA DOJ with negative results)
    Last edited by CarlK90245; 07-30-2013 at 02:56 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Segundo, California
    Posts
    7,859
    Amalia Perez looks like a very solid possible for this Jane Doe.



    http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/p/perez_amalia.html

    * Date LKA (January 2, 1991) is the day prior to the Jane Doe's death (which occurred at 3:00 am in the morning on January 3, 1991)
    * She was LKA in Los Angeles
    * Age over 60 matches
    * Grey Hair Matches
    * Dentures Match
    * Abdominal Scar matches
    * "Dependent Adult" is consistent with someone who would be walking down freeway in her pajamas.

    The weight and height are off, but the other factors are too close to ignore.
    Last edited by CarlK90245; 07-30-2013 at 02:39 PM. Reason: Added age to list of consistent bullet points.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    320
    With those dates, yeah, I'd run with it. The age on the NamUs page is a minimum, so not a problem. The weight discrepancy bothers me more than the height, but all it takes to change an MP's reported weight is a mix of old biodata (e.g. weight from a driver's license not updated in 5 years) and medical conditions or medication.

    Here is one other weaker possible. Biodata is okay, DLC is off.

    Maria De Jesus Valdovinos
    Missing Since: February 8, 1991 from Los Angeles, California
    http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/...nos_maria.html
    http://doenetwork.org/cases/982dfca.html
    http://dojapp.doj.ca.gov/missing/det...=2749104433210

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    6,732

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    18,098
    We've seen height and weight be off by more than that...it looks like a very likely possible to me.
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)

  6. #6
    alreetlike's Avatar
    alreetlike is offline All human wisdom is summed up in these two words -- wait and hope
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
    Posts
    1,241
    Amalia Perez appears to be a great match.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Segundo, California
    Posts
    7,859
    Amalia Perez's NamUs Casefile is now published.



    https://www.findthemissing.org/en/cases/21198/0

    I'm not sure though whether this will help to resolve whether or not she is a match to this Jane Doe.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    El Segundo, California
    Posts
    7,859
    I just talked to Daniel Machian to follow up on this case, and two others.

    He says that he is working with Carrie Southerland to try to locate family members of Amalia Perez.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    6,732
    Sad its taking so long

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    18,098
    Couldn't find any new information about this decedent.
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    139
    There are no rule outs on the UIDs namus page. I guess that means they were unable to find any of Perez's family.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    18,098
    Quote Originally Posted by Otterly View Post
    There are no rule outs on the UIDs namus page. I guess that means they were unable to find any of Perez's family.
    Possibly, though it could just mean that they either never bothered to update Namus or set the information to be seen by LE only.
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)



Similar Threads

  1. CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP3535, 25-45, dumped on sidewalk, Mar'96
    By Kymistry35 in forum The Unidentified
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 12-02-2017, 11:34 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-20-2017, 02:16 PM
  3. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 09-22-2017, 12:10 AM
  4. CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem, UP4218, 27, in dumpster, Aug’84
    By Onfortuneswheel in forum The Unidentified
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-23-2017, 05:01 AM
  5. CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP4412, 60-80, on downtown street, Mar'79
    By CarlK90245 in forum The Unidentified
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-28-2014, 02:14 PM

Tags for this Thread