CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP11403, >60, hit by cars on I-5, Jan'91

CarlK90245

UID Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,242
Reaction score
6,658
NamUs UP # 11403 https://identifyus.org/en/cases/11403

Unidentified White Female

Found January 03, 1991 at In Los Angeles, Los Angeles County CA

Vital Statistics

* Age: Over 60
* Height: 64" (5 feet 4 inches)
* Weight: 184
* Hair Color: Grey
* Scars & Marks: Transverse and paramedian longitudinal scars on lower abdomen​

Circumstances
* Comments: On 1/3/1991 @ 0300 hours the decedent was walking on the S/B I-5 freeway when she was struck by multiple vehicles.​

Clothing and Accesories
* Clothing: Purple & white robe (1) blue sock; red pajama bottoms; red & black underwear; white bra
* Jewelry: 1 y/m band with clear stone; 1 w/m band; 1 beaded bracelet; 1 pair y/m earrings​

Identifiers
* Dental: (No teeth, full set of dentures found with decedent)
* DNA: Not Available
* Fingerprints: Available (Sent to CA DOJ with negative results)​
 
Amalia Perez looks like a very solid possible for this Jane Doe.

perez_amalia.jpg


http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/p/perez_amalia.html

* Date LKA (January 2, 1991) is the day prior to the Jane Doe's death (which occurred at 3:00 am in the morning on January 3, 1991)
* She was LKA in Los Angeles
* Age over 60 matches
* Grey Hair Matches
* Dentures Match
* Abdominal Scar matches
* "Dependent Adult" is consistent with someone who would be walking down freeway in her pajamas.

The weight and height are off, but the other factors are too close to ignore.
 
With those dates, yeah, I'd run with it. The age on the NamUs page is a minimum, so not a problem. The weight discrepancy bothers me more than the height, but all it takes to change an MP's reported weight is a mix of old biodata (e.g. weight from a driver's license not updated in 5 years) and medical conditions or medication.

Here is one other weaker possible. Biodata is okay, DLC is off.

Maria De Jesus Valdovinos
Missing Since: February 8, 1991 from Los Angeles, California
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/v/valdovinos_maria.html
http://doenetwork.org/cases/982dfca.html
http://dojapp.doj.ca.gov/missing/detail.asp?FCN=2749104433210
 
We've seen height and weight be off by more than that...it looks like a very likely possible to me.
 
I just talked to Daniel Machian to follow up on this case, and two others.

He says that he is working with Carrie Southerland to try to locate family members of Amalia Perez.
 
There are no rule outs on the UIDs namus page. I guess that means they were unable to find any of Perez's family.
 
There are no rule outs on the UIDs namus page. I guess that means they were unable to find any of Perez's family.

Possibly, though it could just mean that they either never bothered to update Namus or set the information to be seen by LE only.
 
Namus responded today

- they are unable to compare Amalia Perez MP21198 to this UID.
- UID only has fingerprints available for comparison. No DNA and no dental (Full dentures).
- MP 21198 has no fingerprints, no DNA and no dental (full dentures).

They suggested reaching out to Ms Perez's handling police agency to see if they have any fingerprints available.

(I assume the finality of the 'no DNA' statements means this UID was probably cremated rather than buried.)

I will cross-post this information to the thread for Ms Perez CA - CA - Amalia Perez, 78, Los Angeles, 2 January 1991 (websleuths.com)
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
171
Guests online
1,123
Total visitors
1,294

Forum statistics

Threads
589,940
Messages
17,927,989
Members
228,009
Latest member
chrsrb10
Back
Top