1167 users online (257 members and 910 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 76 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1127
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929

    AZ - Adrienne Salinas, 19, Tempe , 15 June 2013 - #7

    Last edited by KateB; 04-29-2015 at 10:44 PM. Reason: repair url tag.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929
    Please continue here and remember the rules. You can find them right here: The Rules - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community AND don't overlook these!!!!

    Victim Friendly

    Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civl and constructive way and ONLY IF IT IS RELEVANT TO THE CASE. Additionally, sleuthing family members that are not suspect is not allowed. Don't make random accusations or post personal information (even if it is public) like parking tickets, address, or first and last names of all their relatives and their neighbors. Also, never "bash" or attack them, or accuse them of involvement. However that does not mean that family members cannot come into discussion as the facts and issues of the case are discussed.


    Social Networks

    Regarding Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking or blog websites: Links may be used to direct posters to view something on a social networking page. But postings on social networking sites are not considered fact; they are rumor. Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed. Paraphrasing is okay. (Exception: If the Twitter or Facebook post belongs to a verified news station, it may be copied. But a link should still be provided.)

    Also, social networking pages may only be linked if they are directly related to a case, i.e. the victim or suspect. We don't want to post to someone's mother, brother, employer, milkman, or postal carrier just because they know the main player. We also NEVER link to minor's pages (unless they are the victim). And be sure that the page actually belongs to the person being discussed. Do not link to someone if you are not 100% sure it is the correct person. And if a social networking is set to private and you get in the back way, you may not post what you find. Private means private!

    MINORS: Websleuths.com™ does not allow the naming of, or photographs of, minors (children under the age of 18) on the Site unless the child is a missing or deceased person or where law enforcement has identified the minor as a perpetrator of a crime and the minor will be tried as an adult. If a missing child is found and it is learned that such minor was the victim of child exploitation, references to the child’s name and likeness will be removed, and further posting of such information will not be allowed.

    Thanks,

    Cat
    Last edited by KateB; 04-29-2015 at 10:44 PM. Reason: repair url tag.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929
    Just a reminder...

    No one has been named a suspect or person of interest. Sleuthing and discussing anyone as such is not allowed. You can discuss anyone that has been named in main stream media or thru law enforcement. Rumor is not allowed. You can speculate but only with what is known at this time.



    If you would like to be verified as a professional poster, such as an insider/local, doctor, lawyer, chemist, or whatever your profession, then please do the following:
    Email Websleuths at : wsverify@xmission.com
    In your email please include:
    *The case
    *Your Websleuths name
    *Your real name
    *Your phone number and a good time to call
    In the subject line put either the case you are interested in or the profession you wish to verify.

    Thank you!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929
    MAY I HAVE EVERYONE'S ATTENTION PLEASE


    Thank you. I just got off the phone with Sargent Pooley of the Tempe Police Department.

    While Sargent Pooley appreciates your concern and willingness to help it is not necessary to call him. He cannot give you any more information that what has already been given out to the press.

    Please, PLEASE DO NOT CALL SGT POOLEY or anyone involved in the case. Remember it is against our Terms of Service so even if you do call either Sargent Pooley or someone else in the case you can't post about it.

    We have to enforce this rule very strictly. We can't control who you call or speak with but we can stop you from posting about it on Websleuths.

    If we allowed posters to randomly call the police/witnesses/friends/family and then post about it can you imagine the chaos?

    If we let one poster do it we have to let everyone do it and that's why it is against the rules.

    Also Sargent Pooley wanted me to reiterate the following:

    The Cab Driver's story matches up with his GPS, his cellphone pings, and everything else he has given the police. He did not go anywhere that night other than what he told the police. His GPS backs up his story as do the cellphone pings.

    While no one is ever cleared the Cab Driver is not high on their list since his story checks out.

    Please remember the last thing anyone involved in any case needs is a stranger calling them up to find out information. It's just not a good thing to do.

    Thank you.

    Tricia Griffith
    Co-Owner Websleuths.com

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929
    Please continue here...

  6. #6
    alreetlike's Avatar
    alreetlike is offline All human wisdom is summed up in these two words -- wait and hope
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
    Posts
    1,241
    Thread #7 and we're still no further forward than we were at the start.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    7,929
    Thank goodness you finally came, I thought I killed the thread!

  8. #8
    alreetlike's Avatar
    alreetlike is offline All human wisdom is summed up in these two words -- wait and hope
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
    Posts
    1,241
    I couldn't leave you here as the sole voice for Adrienne, though you were doing a fine job!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Paulden, Arizona
    Posts
    10,435

    I have no more theories......


    Need new info, statements, etc.........


    Sgt. Pooley, we need an update!!!!!


    Where are the missing pieces?????


    I am "sleuthed" out.....

    JMO, OMO, MOO, etc., etc........

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Paulden, Arizona
    Posts
    10,435
    Quote Originally Posted by CatFancier View Post
    Thank goodness you finally came, I thought I killed the thread!
    Heck no! I'm on this like a dog with a bone!!!!!

    JMO, OMO, MOO, etc., etc........


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,085
    This case has gone quiet. It's almost like a couple of folks close to the case wanted it to. I feel like we've been duped and purposely misdirected by an online PR campaign. Doesn't change my feelings on the most likely scenario though.

    JMO.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    3,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Tonto View Post
    This case has gone quiet. It's almost like a couple of folks close to the case wanted it to. I feel like we've been duped and purposely misdirected by an online PR campaign. Doesn't change my feelings on the most likely scenario though.

    JMO.
    This. And it makes me both sad and furious. Tonto, I think from what you have posted, that we are on the same page. I cling to this case because it is local, but have many hinkies with the players in this. Also, I think the Tempe PD spokesperson is merely a mouthpiece and put very little stock in what he reports. all JMO too.
    "A word after a word after a word is power."
    ~Margaret Atwood~

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    1,319
    The cases are non-stop parallels...party nights gone bad, in and out of apartments, fights or arguments, possible jealousies, drug use mentioned, roommate and friends on FB not so sympathetic or interested, underage partying, etc. & etc.

    ^^cluciano^^

    don't forget the boyfriend who went to sleep so gets written out, and the cell phone, which I have been saying was brought back to where she was, instead of Lauren leaving her cell phone. and also the witness who places her somewhere at a specific time and then disappears from
    the story no matter how many times it is written up/discussed by LE or MSM.

    Sorry to confuse people, but the cell phones in both cases may hold the key
    to the mysteries.

    That being said, someone help me out: Does LE actually need the physical cell phone? In Lauren's case, they have her phone, and IMO, someone tried to
    set up a fake alibi and then put her phone back in one of the places she may have left it. It is MO that LE in this case is not revealing that because it's going to be a real indicator of guilt.

    In Adrienne's case, LE might really have her phone, or at least every text/call her phone had on it, and are trying to figure out who had it.
    Faith, Hope, and Love

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    37,774
    Lauren left her cell phone in the bar and it was not collected until the next day. Bar employees verified this.

    LE says they did not find A's phone but would have access to texts and calls, though obviously not to spoken conversations.
    Just my opinion, of course.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,085
    Quote Originally Posted by AzPistonsGirl View Post
    This. And it makes me both sad and furious. Tonto, I think from what you have posted, that we are on the same page. I cling to this case because it is local, but have many hinkies with the players in this. Also, I think the Tempe PD spokesperson is merely a mouthpiece and put very little stock in what he reports. all JMO too.
    Well, this person or persons clearly succeeded, as we used to have 20 registered folks viewing/participating in this thread at any given time, and another 18-25 visitors. Now we have 5 at most. And we've moved well away from the most likely scenario, and when it is brought up folks now dismiss it outright.

    So, job well done I suppose. Hell, LE was even spooked by them it seems.

    JMO.

Page 1 of 76 1 2 3 11 51 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. AZ AZ - Adrienne Salinas, 19, Tempe , 15 June 2013 - #6
    By CatFancier in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 998
    Last Post: 08-07-2013, 03:53 PM
  2. AZ AZ - Adrienne Salinas, 19, Tempe , 15 June 2013 - #5
    By CatFancier in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 476
    Last Post: 07-28-2013, 12:41 AM
  3. AZ AZ - Adrienne Salinas, 19, Tempe , 15 June 2013 - #3
    By CatFancier in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 1009
    Last Post: 07-23-2013, 07:53 PM
  4. AZ AZ - Adrienne Salinas, 19, Tempe , 15 June 2013 - #1
    By monicadc74 in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 1063
    Last Post: 07-02-2013, 06:50 PM

Tags for this Thread