1534 users online (293 members and 1241 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 3 of 71 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1063
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4,386
    Radar on line? Really? That's what is passing as reliable media these days? Why didn't this ex girlfriend talk to a real journalist instead? Maybe Radar pays more for the "juicy stuff".

    MOO

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,973
    Quote Originally Posted by TorisMom003 View Post
    Radar on line? Really? That's what is passing as reliable media these days? Why didn't this ex girlfriend talk to a real journalist instead? Maybe Radar pays more for the "juicy stuff".

    MOO
    I think it's all about the money. Sollecito must be texting her madly, while she doesn't respond.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    I think it's all about the money. Sollecito must be texting her madly, while she doesn't respond.
    IMO Otto, linking to tabloid trash like that seriously undermines the credibility of other links you provide. JMO

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    I think it's all about the money. Sollecito must be texting her madly, while she doesn't respond.
    Or maybe he doesn't. I confess I'm a bit more skeptical about the Radar than you

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    The falsified transcript was discussed here a couple of threads ago. It came from the fake wiki, along with the falsified timeline Sherlock reposted that had phone calls reshuffled to "prove" the postals arrived before calling the Carabinieri.

    I have no idea what lies do you refer to. You need to be more specific, with quotes. If it's part of the evidence I'd be happy to discuss it.
    BBM thank you I guess it's too much to ask. Of course I know what was discussed because it was my link.

    I have linked to the interview RS (originally posted by a poster who believes them innocent) gave where he said this, of course it isn't in evidence because he didn't testify in his own defense. Although he's done plenty talking to the media and in his book, when he's not under oath or being cross examined by a prosecutor. He seems to have no issue with misrepresenting the evidence, as long as its in his favor.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    7,952
    Quote Originally Posted by quesarita View Post
    IMO Otto, linking to tabloid trash like that seriously undermines the credibility of other links you provide. JMO
    Radar may be into "celebrity gossip" but I think they are legitimate in their verification and fact-checking (I used to work as a press agent and press release manager). Thanks for posting, Otto

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by SMK View Post
    Radar may be into "celebrity gossip" but I think they are legitimate in their verification and fact-checking (I used to work as a press agent and press release manager).
    We'll see. Nothing to confirm the story of the lady what's her name so far.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by Amber29 View Post
    I have linked to the interview RS (originally posted by a poster who believes them innocent) gave where he said this, of course it isn't in evidence because he didn't testify in his own defense. Although he's done plenty talking to the media and in his book, when he's not under oath or being cross examined by a prosecutor. He seems to have no issue with misrepresenting the evidence, as long as its in his favor.
    I don't think you're correct about it, TBH.
    I've read his book and the timing seems about right and in accordance with the evidence. After all it was something discussed in court.

    They were at the police station from after 10pm to next day.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    I don't think you're correct about it, TBH.
    I've read his book and the timing seems about right and in accordance with the evidence. After all it was something discussed in court.

    They were at the police station from after 10pm to next day.
    Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Amanda Knox tried for the murder of Meredith Kercher in Italy *NEW TRIAL*#8

    Here's the original post about it.
    Last edited by KateB; 05-18-2015 at 06:29 PM. Reason: repair url tag.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,073
    Could you point out the "lie"?


  11. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    The falsified transcript was discussed here a couple of threads ago. It came from the fake wiki, along with the falsified timeline Sherlock reposted that had phone calls reshuffled to "prove" the postals arrived before calling the Carabinieri.

    I have no idea what lies do you refer to. You need to be more specific, with quotes. If it's part of the evidence I'd be happy to discuss it.


    bbm

    I was not a part of this conversation between you two, but I was keeping up with it because IUR, our conversation about staged window was parallel to the one with you and Amber.

    So I clearly recall what Amber is referring to, I'm so surprised you don't?

    I remember quite clearly. As well as Amber asking the question many times. This is puzzling - how can I remember it, being a bystander to the conversation, but you do not, having been a part of it?
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by quesarita View Post
    IMO the hallmarks of this case are misleading statements and mistranslations, both accidental and deliberate. IMO there's no point in talking about a "paid for" PR machine in favor of Amanda Knox when the police and prosecution deliberately and with malice leaked damaging partial information about her and the evidence to the press, before they had completed enough of their investigation to know that Rudy G was present.

    We here can only work with what's available and make up our own minds as to the veracity of the different sites.
    I do not agree that the hallmarks of this case are what you mentioned.
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,973
    Quote Originally Posted by quesarita View Post
    IMO Otto, linking to tabloid trash like that seriously undermines the credibility of other links you provide. JMO
    Thanks.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    OK, she did it so well that there is no evidence of tampering or manipulating. How unfortunate for your theory
    Au contraire - there is evidence of tampering and manipulating.
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,973
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    I don't think you're correct about it, TBH.
    I've read his book and the timing seems about right and in accordance with the evidence. After all it was something discussed in court.

    They were at the police station from after 10pm to next day.
    BBM
    That's right. That's what happens when people are arrested. In fact, it wasn't just the next day, that detention lasted four years.

Page 3 of 71 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 13 53 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 943
    Last Post: 01-31-2014, 10:01 AM
  2. Replies: 1026
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 08:07 AM
  3. Replies: 1064
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 12:29 AM
  4. Replies: 1013
    Last Post: 12-19-2013, 05:30 AM
  5. Replies: 1011
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 12:34 AM

Tags for this Thread