1257 users online (269 members and 988 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 5 of 71 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1063
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    Could you be more clear?
    She posted the link to the video of Raffaele stating he got there about 5 hours or whatever it was earlier the time that is in the records. And then she was asking you, why did he misrepresent the time he arrived at the station? And I don't think it ever got answered, IIRC.
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by aa9511 View Post
    She posted the link to the video of Raffaele stating he got there about 5 hours or whatever it was earlier the time that is in the records. And then she was asking you, why did he misrepresent the time he arrived at the station? And I don't think it ever got answered, IIRC.
    ?? He's not saying that in the video.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4,386
    Quote Originally Posted by aa9511 View Post
    Ah, I see. Okay, so if I take a pencil from the library - that means that my "character" allows me to just as easily steal a computer from the library. Ah, so clear now. In that case, let's go back and see if Amanda has ever done a prank on anyone before............................................ ..............................
    Apples and oranges. The better case scenario would be has Amanda ever played a "prank" that was violent, involved using a knife. Rudy has an MO of breaking and entering for the purpose of burglary, with a knife, and a violent tendency towards women. As far as we know Rudy does not have an MO of "pranks", violent or otherwise. So when looking at the case, and the evidence that was left behind, it points to one person. The one person that has the same MO that the crime shows, Rudy. Perhaps that is why it is so difficult to believe that Rudy played such a small or limited role in this crime. It is also very difficult to believe that this crime started off as a "prank gone bad". It appears to defy logic and common sense IMO.

    MOO

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by quesarita View Post
    As I said, I don't know how Meredith would have talked about knowing Rudy, just that it would be incorrect to say that they had not been in the same room with mutual "friends" before, or that Rudy didn't know who Meredith was - therefore it would not be classified as a "random" or "stranger" rape.
    Ok, then in the discussion of how the three Amanda, RS, and Rudy got together, why is it so often brought up that what did Amanda and RS have to do with Rudy? When clearly Amanda knew him, that much we can all agree on. I also think RS knew him, but anyway I will leave that out for now.

    Amanda knew him.
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    Could you point out the "lie"?
    Right past the 11 min mark in the video.. He states AK had been waiting 5 hours, which is a LIE.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    Please continue. What is the evidence they staged the rape, collected Guede's DNA and then put it inside victim's body and around?
    You never answered my question. Because Rudy's bloody clothes were not found, does that mean he was naked when he committed the murder?
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    27,178
    Quote Originally Posted by TorisMom003 View Post
    The rock through the window is NOT a rather obvious example of tampering with the scene, especially if it was NOT staged as the police thought. The missing phones can not be contributed to only AK and/or RS. Same goes for the locked bedroom door. Showering in a bathroom that is not obviously covered in blood is also not a clear example of tampering. It is however an example of not realizing a crime had been comitted and going on with a person's day as normal.

    MOO
    If we assume that every level of the Italian justice system is mistaken, confused, corrupt, incompetent and malicious, then of course there is no tampering. If we look at the case at face value, then there is very clearly a staged break in.

    Knox's email
    November 4, 2007

    "i undressed in my room and took a quick shower in one of the two bathrooms in my house, the one that is right next to meredith and my bedrooms (situated right next to one another). it was after i stepped out of the shower and onto the mat that i noticed the blood in the bathroom. it was on the mat i was using to dry my feet and there were drops of blood in the sink. at first i thought the blood might have come from my ears which i had pierced extrensively not too long ago, but then immediately i know it wasnt mine becaus the stains on the mat were too big for just droplets form my ear, and when i touched the blood in the sink it was caked on already. there was also blood smeered on the faucet. again, however, i thought it was strange, ..."

    Two Reference, same information:

    http://www.anorak.co.uk/379615/news/...e-denial.html/

    http://themurderofmeredithkercher.co...27s_Email_Home

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    ?? He's not saying that in the video.
    Maybe it was a book link. Anyway, if you do not remember, that's fine. You have very clear and detailed memory of the aspects of this case and of the court papers, so I just assumed you would have an excellent memory in other areas as well.
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by Katody View Post
    ?? He's not saying that in the video.
    What exactly is he saying then? Please I need to know the excuse for this lie.

    He says the reason AK was "stretching" is because she had been waiting 5 hours. That is a major exaggeration of the truth and what evidence and AK herself says. She tells the time they arrived at the station in her testimony.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by TorisMom003 View Post
    Apples and oranges. The better case scenario would be has Amanda ever played a "prank" that was violent, involved using a knife. Rudy has an MO of breaking and entering for the purpose of burglary, with a knife, and a violent tendency towards women. As far as we know Rudy does not have an MO of "pranks", violent or otherwise. So when looking at the case, and the evidence that was left behind, it points to one person. The one person that has the same MO that the crime shows, Rudy. Perhaps that is why it is so difficult to believe that Rudy played such a small or limited role in this crime. It is also very difficult to believe that this crime started off as a "prank gone bad". It appears to defy logic and common sense IMO.

    MOO
    Do you know for a fact that the prank which Amanda was involved in in Seattle did not involve knives? As I understand it, this whole prank thing was just a "rumor" to begin with, suddenly having been confirmed by Amanda herself many years after the fact. Therefore, I wonder what other "rumors" there are involving Amanda which we do not know about...................................
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias


  11. #71
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,308
    Quote Originally Posted by aa9511 View Post
    Maybe it was a book link. Anyway, if you do not remember, that's fine. You have very clear and detailed memory of the aspects of this case and of the court papers, so I just assumed you would have an excellent memory in other areas as well.
    I've provided the link to the post with the video. You should watch it. Just past the 11min mark. RS should really brush up on the facts before giving interviews.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4,386
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    If we assume that every level of the Italian justice system is mistaken, confused, corrupt, incompetent and malicious, then of course there is no tampering. If we look at the case at face value, then there is very clearly a staged break in.

    Knox's email
    November 4, 2007

    "i undressed in my room and took a quick shower in one of the two bathrooms in my house, the one that is right next to meredith and my bedrooms (situated right next to one another). it was after i stepped out of the shower and onto the mat that i noticed the blood in the bathroom. it was on the mat i was using to dry my feet and there were drops of blood in the sink. at first i thought the blood might have come from my ears which i had pierced extrensively not too long ago, but then immediately i know it wasnt mine becaus the stains on the mat were too big for just droplets form my ear, and when i touched the blood in the sink it was caked on already. there was also blood smeered on the faucet. again, however, i thought it was strange, ..."

    Two Reference, same information:

    http://www.anorak.co.uk/379615/news/...e-denial.html/

    http://themurderofmeredithkercher.co...27s_Email_Home
    I have been looking at the case at face value and I still do not see signs of tampering or manipulation by Ak and/or RS. I did not come into this case believing one way or the other in their innocence or guilt. I have, however, looked at the evidence, the way things were handled (collecting evidence) and photos.

    Not every court believes that AK and RS are in fact guilty. Even though Hellman was annulled does not mean that his opinion, as a judge, is to be completely discounted as someone (court) that believes they are innocent.

    Showing what Amanda said does not show evidence of tampering or manipulation. It shows that she only paid attention to the spots of blood in the bathroom after taking a shower.

    MOO

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    4,386
    Quote Originally Posted by aa9511 View Post
    Do you know for a fact that the prank which Amanda was involved in in Seattle did not involve knives? As I understand it, this whole prank thing was just a "rumor" to begin with, suddenly having been confirmed by Amanda herself many years after the fact. Therefore, I wonder what other "rumors" there are involving Amanda which we do not know about...................................
    So now we just assume that Amanda had a past of playing pranks involving knives. I suppose this makes it easier to believe the worst in her. But let's forget the fact that Rudy has clearly shown his character from his past with his use of knives and violence towards women. Sometimes I can't help but have my mouth drop open in disbelief at what is believed and what is ignored.

    MOO

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    477
    Quote Originally Posted by aa9511 View Post
    Ok, then in the discussion of how the three Amanda, RS, and Rudy got together, why is it so often brought up that what did Amanda and RS have to do with Rudy? When clearly Amanda knew him, that much we can all agree on. I also think RS knew him, but anyway I will leave that out for now.

    Amanda knew him.
    And if it was Amanda and not Meredith who was raped and murdered, the same standard would apply. To go right from being in the same room with mutual friends one time, to plotting an elaborate break-in and coverup together, is not a logical stretch. There has to be some additional relationship between the 3.

    Amanda did mention Rudy to the police as someone who had been to the cottage (downstairs) but did not know his name.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    6,639
    Quote Originally Posted by TorisMom003 View Post
    I have been looking at the case at face value and I still do not see signs of tampering or manipulation by Ak and/or RS. I did not come into this case believing one way or the other in their innocence or guilt. I have, however, looked at the evidence, the way things were handled (collecting evidence) and photos.

    Not every court believes that AK and RS are in fact guilty. Even though Hellman was annulled does not mean that his opinion, as a judge, is to be completely discounted as someone (court) that believes they are innocent.

    Showing what Amanda said does not show evidence of tampering or manipulation. It shows that she only paid attention to the spots of blood in the bathroom after taking a shower.

    MOO
    bbm

    How do we know what evidence was tampered or manipulated, if if was tampered with and manipulated with?
    Now my philosophy is that it's never okay to kill someone. -- Convicted Murderer Jodi Arias

Page 5 of 71 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 943
    Last Post: 01-31-2014, 10:01 AM
  2. Replies: 1026
    Last Post: 01-12-2014, 08:07 AM
  3. Replies: 1064
    Last Post: 01-05-2014, 12:29 AM
  4. Replies: 1013
    Last Post: 12-19-2013, 05:30 AM
  5. Replies: 1011
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 12:34 AM

Tags for this Thread