1530 users online (290 members and 1240 guests)  


Websleuths News

View Poll Results: Do you think the prosecutor proved the case?

Voters
250. You may not vote on this poll
  • The case for murder was demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt

    76 30.40%
  • Murder directus -OP fired shots knowing it was RS and intended to kill her

    143 57.20%
  • Murder eventualis- OP believed it was a burglar, foresaw he would kill by shooting

    19 7.60%
  • The case for culpable homicide was proven

    33 13.20%
  • There are many holes in the case Ė too many unanswered questions

    20 8.00%
  • Prosecutorís evidence and witness testimony verify OPís version

    3 1.20%
  • The firearm charges were substantiated

    38 15.20%
  • None of the above

    1 0.40%
Multiple Choice Poll.

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11
Results 151 to 159 of 159
  1. #151
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    202
    Quote Originally Posted by Interested Bystander View Post
    I totally agree but this boy seems to lead a charmed life. I have no idea what will happen and it is only my opinion that somehow he will be allowed to stay out on bail if he is allowed to appeal his sentence. I hope I am completely wrong.
    I agree..this guy always gets the red carpet treatment

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2
    The evidence that Reeva screamed is much stronger than the evidence that Oscar can scream like a woman. If Reeva screamed then we talking here about dolus directus - 1st Degree murder. Read more about our investigation to the evidence at truth4reeva.com.

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    3,304
    Not sure where we're allowed to post this but it looks like the charmed life continues for another two months... June 13-17th is now when the sentencing is to be argued/heard.

    Pistorius's bail conditions amended
    South Africa Monday 18 April 2016 - 9:13am

    https://www.enca.com/south-africa/li...ius-sentencing


  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    4,077
    Karma will get him in the end. Despicable creature.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Hamburg/Bremen
    Posts
    5,471

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    1,432
    Glad you posted this FromGermany. The Daily Mail had a similar article http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rts-claim.html

    And IMO this makes far more sense and seems to fit the whole picture of the evidence we have heard. The argument, the screams, and I was unaware of the evidence of the air rifle pellets as well as the fact that apparently the clothes Reeva was wearing do not fit with the pattern of gunshot wounds.

  7. #157
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,189
    Has anyone bought the linked book here?

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Up Nel's Arse
    Posts
    1,460
    I also posted the following on yr timeline analysis...

    I think there is an even simpler explanation which creates an even tighter fit for your analysis.

    That explanation is that Mike Nhlegenthwas was not a witness to the murder at all – and that is why he never hears any shots or Reeva scream.

    Dr Stipp is timed on the same clock as Mike Nhlegenthwa so this actually provide a very accurate time of the shooting.

    i.e. sometime in the moments before 3:15:51

    Mr N actually testifies that he never hears any shots. He is instead awoken by his wife who was woken by shots. No further shots are heard. Surely it is thus strange that on the Masipa/Roux timeline, not only do the Nhlegenthwa’s not notice the second set of bangs allegedly at 3.17 but the Stipp’s also don’t report them either? Despite both sets of witnesses being direct observers and wide awake?

    So surely the simpler answer is that what Mike N actually heard was in fact Pistorius because Reeva was shot near dead by the time he woke up and begain to telephone and investigate?

    Of course this brings one squarely to the Charl Johnson 3.17 call timing issue – but his call time is
    a) Hearsay
    b) Not timed on the same security log clock
    c) accurate only to within one minute

    So for example if Johnson simply has the order mixed up and the last shots happened before his 3.17 call (surely a better explanation than having to completely reformat the Stipp’s evidence by 10 mins!) then your sequence works perfectly.

    Mr N actually fits perfectly with your argument for bats, gun, then panel broken out.

    Shots is sometime prior to 3.15.51 allowing time for Mike Stipp to get to the phone and dial at 3.16
    Bats is sometime prior to the shots

  9. #159
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,316
    A ballistic expert who helped form the evidence for Oscar Pistorius' trial has said that Reeva Steenkamp was likely screaming when she was shot at four times.

    http://www.9news.com.au/videos/cj7b1...ming-when-shot

    A video at link with animation re-enacting the shooting. No doubts there, prosecutor proved their case.

Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11


Similar Threads

  1. FL - Casey Anthony prosecutor Jeff Ashton to defend son in DUI case
    By Reality Orlando in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-22-2012, 05:01 PM
  2. IL - Prosecutor buys alcohol for underage girl at center of case
    By peeples in forum Crimes-Spotlight on Children
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-05-2011, 09:41 AM
  3. Fmr. Prosecutor Robin Sax on the Anthony Case
    By Levi in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-29-2009, 01:57 PM
  4. Judge throws out rape case after prosecutor late to court
    By Paladin in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 06-26-2006, 03:13 PM