784 users online (142 members and 642 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. Buddha
    Posts
    22,071

    Here it is Judges Ruling about Cameras in the Courtroom.

    We'll see the courtroom action but only AFTER the decision is made by the jury. Unless the judge says it's ok and then it has to be on a fifteen minute delay.

    I am posting this while exhausted so if I have made any mistakes forgive me.

    PWE. Posting While Exhausted. Should be illegal.
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Websleuths is TEMPORARILY accepting donations.

    CLICK HERE
    to visit our GoFundMe page

    OR










  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    12,328
    That's fine with me! At least we'll get to see the going-on's after a verdict has (or has not) been reached. I bet Stabby is pretty upset right now. IMHO.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the media may use their equipment to record (audio and/or
    video) the penalty phase retrial consistent with this order, the provisions of Rule 122 and 122.1 of the Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court and the policies and procedure of the Maricopa County Superior Court. Those recordings may not be aired or used for any purpose until after a verdict has been reached by the jury in the penalty phase retrial.

    Thanks Tricia!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,728
    This seems like closing the barn door after the horse has not only left, but run off to Vegas and become an Elvis impersonator. I assume the media is going to appeal this ruling. I can't think what possible difference it could make at this point -- there's still a wealth of material out there on the internet.
    We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now ~ Martin Luther King Jr.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Anaheim, CA
    Posts
    13,673
    When is the penalty re-trial?
    For Elizabeth, a minor child, a victim. Thank God she is home!

    *Gitana (means "Gypsy girl"). Pronounced "hee tah nah."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    The Great State of Texas
    Posts
    7,614
    Quote Originally Posted by gitana1 View Post
    When is the penalty re-trial?
    Jury selection starts Sept 8th

    Corpus Christi, Texas

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Orleans
    Posts
    15,410


    I am outraged by this decision ... but I am not surprised ...

    This "judge" is one of the worse I have ever seen ... she is "spineless" ...

    I hope the media chimes in on this ...

    Oh, and yes, I hope Jodi Arias complains also -- I know I know ... but ya know Jodi will be just upset if there is no live coverage !



    JMSSO = Just My Super Secret Opinion

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Land of Ago
    Posts
    15,651
    Quote Originally Posted by dog.gone.cute View Post


    I am outraged by this decision ... but I am not surprised ...

    This "judge" is one of the worse I have ever seen ... she is "spineless" ...

    I hope the media chimes in on this ...

    Oh, and yes, I hope Jodi Arias complains also -- I know I know ... but ya know Jodi will be just upset if there is no live coverage !



    I think this is her reconsideration after first having denied camera coverage, I suppose appeals could always be lodged but I doubt she'd hear it. I think this is what we're getting, like it or not.

    Thanks for posting it, Trisha.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2,425
    So no cameras until after the fact....and that is maybe.

    Will people beable to post live from the trial? Or will we have to wait for reports at breaks and at days end?

    Wish we could see the trial live, but then She will not have her live audience to act for....just after and we can fast forward then I we so choose!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,582
    Something screwy is going on with my computer and I can't open the thumbnail.

    Having said that, I must be dense. Why is she not allowing the video/audio to the public until AFTER verdict? Either allow it in real time or don't. What is the purpose for the delay? I just don't get it. I'm not understanding her reasoning.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OnEarth
    Posts
    3,311
    Quote Originally Posted by G&AMom View Post
    This seems like closing the barn door after the horse has not only left, but run off to Vegas and become an Elvis impersonator. I assume the media is going to appeal this ruling. I can't think what possible difference it could make at this point -- there's still a wealth of material out there on the internet.
    I agree cnn should appeal what r they so afraid of 2nd time around?
    Dont Be A Sheep


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OnEarth
    Posts
    3,311
    Quote Originally Posted by screecher View Post
    Something screwy is going on with my computer and I can't open the thumbnail.

    Having said that, I must be dense. Why is she not allowing the video/audio to the public until AFTER verdict? Either allow it in real time or don't. What is the purpose for the delay? I just don't get it. I'm not understanding her reasoning.
    is it so they can edit out jodis selfies and porn closeups? its alreadt aired and live unedited.
    Dont Be A Sheep

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Swamp
    Posts
    7,134
    What can be worse than what has already been shown during the 1st trial?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,582
    Maybe because her 'mitigating factors witness/witnesses' don't want to be on video/audio and the 15 min delay will provide time to 'cut/censor it out'?

    Just makes no sense. Even SA allows video/audio in real time for the OP trial. (unless testifying witnesses wish not to be on camera, then they are not shown)

    ETA: Oh no. It just occurred to me...maybe Arias is relenting on her request for a closed courtroom only if certain conditions are met? Such as her being the one who censures/cuts testimony and statements? BWahahahah. I must be going bonkers. Hahaha

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    Quote Originally Posted by MsJosie View Post
    So no cameras until after the fact....and that is maybe.

    Will people beable to post live from the trial? Or will we have to wait for reports at breaks and at days end?

    Wish we could see the trial live, but then She will not have her live audience to act for....just after and we can fast forward then I we so choose!
    Jodi seems to inspire the lowest of lows to act on her behalf so they may want to edit some of the tapes that are iffy. Her attorneys really don't have much control of what she attempts to do at times. If she feels no one will ever see the taped version she may behave herself, for once. lol Just a guess and just my opinion.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Kensie View Post
    What can be worse than what has already been shown during the 1st trial?
    ITA. That was exactly my reaction.
    We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now ~ Martin Luther King Jr.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Judges declare war on pet owners
    By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-18-2004, 10:37 AM