806 users online (145 members and 661 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 97
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    4,278

    The Royal Bum

    Royal privacy row as German tabloid publishes picture of the Duchess of Cambridge’s bare behind when her skirt blew up during Australia tour.


    A German newspaper has risked a royal upset by publishing a photograph of the Duchess of Cambridge’s bare bottom.
    The picture was taken during Kate’s recent tour of Australia when a gust of wind briefly caught her dress – and her flimsy underwear did not offer much protection.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz32vRZDoWo
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    http://www.bild.de/unterhaltung/leut...6770.bild.html

    What underwear? I don't think she was wearing any.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,185
    I'm thinking maybe Kate is a bit of a exhibitionist. Remember those topless sunbathing photos? She has to know a camara is always focused on her.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    I think she should be able to wear whatever underwear she pleases. MANY women wear thong underwear. There is nothing exhibitionist about it. Sure she knows the press will be there. And if she has obvious panty lines, they will be talking about that. The topless photos where on her balcony. It was SUPPOSED to be a private, and secure part of the island. There is nothing exhibitionist about being topless, when you think there is no way of someone seeing. They used a crazy lens from very far away, and they didn't think they would be anywhere near the secure spot they were. They have taken similar vacations since, and you don't see it happening again. Most likely, because they know realize they don't get secured private vacations. It's impossible, even when people promise them security. There is nothing exhibitionist about a helicopter lifting a skirt. How many helicopters has she been on, dozens? This is the first bare bum photo, so obviously she wasn't counting on this particular helicopter lifting her skirt.

    Now, I literally couldn't care less about the royal family. I often find it strange what is and is not allowed. I mean, if someone walked by and took a cell phone photo up her skirt, but you can post a bare photo without someone's consent. It makes no sense. I'm not a defender of the royal family (I actually think having them is pointless) but a girl should be able to wear underwear she i comfortable in and walk under a helicopter, without some creepy photographer publishing a photo of her private parts, that she OBVIOUSLY didn't consent to showing or the picture of.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,185
    I also think she should be able to wear whatever she wants. But if you do, and it gets photographed, there you are. Don't get bent about it. I could bend over and show my bare, necked azz, and no one would even bother to look.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    Quote Originally Posted by rob View Post
    I also think she should be able to wear whatever she wants. But if you do, and it gets photographed, there you are. Don't get bent about it. I could bend over and show my bare, necked azz, and no one would even bother to look.
    I beg to differ. If I wear a thong and a random thing happens that lifts my skirt, I would absolutely be mad that a photo of my privates are circulating the web. No matter who I am. We should be able to leave our homes with the expectation (if we are famous or just an everyday person) that people won't take advantage and exploit our bodies.

    The thing is, it's not like she wore a thong and did something that would cause her bottom to be exposed. If she was doing something silly, that everyone knows would make that happen...it's one thing. She wasn't, she was walking to a helicopter.
    Last edited by blue22; 05-27-2014 at 11:41 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    8,773
    WTH?? I came on here to see who the press was accusing now of being a bum in a royal family. Instead, I find a thread about Princess Kate's derrière. Seriously?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25,216
    Quote Originally Posted by blue22 View Post
    I beg to differ. If I wear a thong and a random thing happens that lifts my skirt, I would absolutely be mad that a photo of my privates are circulating the web. No matter who I am. We should be able to leave our homes with the expectation (if we are famous or just an everyday person) that people won't take advantage and exploit our bodies.

    The thing is, it's not like she wore a thong and did something that would cause her bottom to be exposed. If she was doing something silly, that everyone knows would make that happen...it's one thing. She wasn't, she was walking to a helicopter.
    When you are in public, you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. So if you wear a thong (or go commando) and your skirt flies up, you have yourself to blame. Put on some panties before going out in a skirt.
    Just my opinion

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    Quote Originally Posted by jjenny View Post
    When you are in public, you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. So if you wear a thong (or go commando) and your skirt flies up, you have yourself to blame. Put on some panties before going out in a skirt.
    Thongs are panties. And yes, you DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Everyone should be able to go out of their home without body parts being splashed on the internet.

    I'm actually kind of disgusted that I live in a world that thinks it's okay to publish body parts without consent.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25,216
    Again, out in public you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. While nobody follows us around to take photos, we are likely on security camera most of the time while we are out. If you don't want people to look at your naked bum, dress accordingly.
    Just my opinion

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    Quote Originally Posted by jjenny View Post
    Again, out in public you don't have a reasonable expectation of privacy. While nobody follows us around to take photos, we are likely on security camera most of the time while we are out. If you don't want people to look at your naked bum, dress accordingly.
    It's not people looking, that I take issue with.

    It's the publishing of photos without consent. Again, I DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. People can't walk around and take pictures up my skirt and publish them. They shouldn't be able to do this either.

    It doesn't matter what I wear. The publishing of what is considered private body parts without consent, should be illegal. She DID cover her butt. She was wearing a skirt. She wasn't walking around nude.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    25,216
    Quote Originally Posted by blue22 View Post
    It's not people looking, that I take issue with.

    It's the publishing of photos without consent. Again, I DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. People can't walk around and take pictures up my skirt and publish them. They shouldn't be able to do this either.

    It doesn't matter what I wear. The publishing of what is considered private body parts without consent, should be illegal. She DID cover her butt. She was wearing a skirt. She wasn't walking around nude.
    Skirt + wind + thong (or commando) = naked behind. I am sure everybody knows that.
    Just my opinion

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    SE MITTEN STATE
    Posts
    1,340
    Quote Originally Posted by blue22 View Post
    Thongs are panties. And yes, you DO have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Everyone should be able to go out of their home without body parts being splashed on the internet.

    I'm actually kind of disgusted that I live in a world that thinks it's okay to publish body parts without consent.

    I agree. It was posted on Drudge Report yesterday morning. Disappointed in Drudge for posting that. That's more like tmz style.

    But I do hope from now on when I see a pic of her in a dress, I hope I don't wonder if she's wearing undies,
    ick

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    Quote Originally Posted by jjenny View Post
    Skirt + wind + thong (or commando) = naked behind. I am sure everybody knows that.
    Again, it doesn't matter what she wears. No one should have the right to PUBLISH pictures of nude body parts. Why is that so hard to understand. It's not about her clothes, or what you consider lacking.

  14. #14
    Blue - I think I understand what you are trying to say unfortunately morals don't come into play when they have the legal right to publish the pictures.

    I love Kate but seriously, there has been a long standing issue with her skirt blowing up and have read articles that the queen has given her skirt length requirements now or something. Maybe the queen will make her wear the traditional granny panties from now on too.
    ^^^^^ My posts are all IMO, JMO, MOO unless I have included a link^^^^^

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,183
    Quote Originally Posted by princesspjs View Post
    Blue - I think I understand what you are trying to say unfortunately morals don't come into play when they have the legal right to publish the pictures.

    I love Kate but seriously, there has been a long standing issue with her skirt blowing up and have read articles that the queen has given her skirt length requirements now or something. Maybe the queen will make her wear the traditional granny panties from now on too.
    It should be legal, that is the problem. I don't care if it's a royal family member, or plain jane walking down the street. Our laws need to catch up with technology!

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Royal Baby #2 is on it's way ..
    By Mrs G Norris in forum Celebrity and Entertainment News
    Replies: 161
    Last Post: 11-29-2015, 10:27 AM
  2. I am about ready to throw a fit ROYAL
    By trixie in forum Forum Finesse
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-01-2008, 04:17 PM
  3. A Royal example
    By Floh in forum Celebrity and Entertainment News
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-02-2007, 04:09 PM
  4. Kitchen gets 'Royal' ceremony
    By Casshew in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-30-2004, 10:16 PM