Were foreign serial killers involved?

1. Common letters were grossly malformed. Common words were misspelled.
2. Some of the terms used are unusual.
3. RN author stated he was "...a member of a group that represents a foreign faction."
4. RN author stated he respects John's "...bussiness, but not the country that it serves."
5. RN author left a large handwriting sample. This is risky for a local, and safer for a foreigner.
6. The closing salutation "Victory!" harks back to foreign powers, according to a FBI profiler.

1. RN author stated there are two gentlemen helping.
2. Unusual levels of brutal violence both in word and deed, unprecedented in filicide, although common in serial killing.
3. RN author stated that he is against "'fat cats." SK's sometimes believe they are ridding the world of "undesirables."
4. RN author stated that further (and therefore, "serial") killing "won't be difficult."

Toltec said:

The notes got Patsy written all over it...her degree in Journalism allows her to write something so bizarre that no one can make any sense of it.

...Hi, it is me Patsy, (you're wife...remember me...I know I sound foreign) and I am hopping mad at you and you're damn job John!

Click to expand...

Seeker said:

The note was as bogus as the "kidnapping".

Members of "foreign" factions will name the group they are representing.


Toltec has been around long enough to know the Ramsey's are guilty of (at bare minimum) a cover up for the person who actually murdered JonBenet.

Click to expand...

BlueCrab said:

It is indeed possible that the ransom note was the product of a member from a "small foreign faction". The theory isn't at the top of my list of possible scenarios, but the note and the killing could have been a chilling message from the Asian Pacific American Coalition.

APAC was a 29-member pro-active political group at the University of Colorado at Boulder which, among other issues, was interested in correcting what it perceived as injustices when it came to apprehending and prosecuting perpetrators of violent crimes against Asian-American women. The group suspiciously disbanded just weeks after the murder of JonBenet.

There was a direct link between APAC and the Ramsey and Stine families by way of NI, a 21-year-old caregiver for DS who lived at the Stine's house and was a member of APAC. NI regularly babysat DS, BR, and JBR and drove the three children to school.

My theory is that a "loose cannon" in APAC used high-profile JonBenet to send a message to America. To the best of my knowledge, none of the 29 APAC members were ever investigated.

BlueCrab

Click to expand...

BlueCrab said:

It is indeed possible that the ransom note was the product of a member from a "small foreign faction". The theory isn't at the top of my list of possible scenarios, but the note and the killing could have been a chilling message from the Asian Pacific American Coalition.

APAC was a 29-member pro-active political group at the University of Colorado at Boulder which, among other issues, was interested in correcting what it perceived as injustices when it came to apprehending and prosecuting perpetrators of violent crimes against Asian-American women. The group suspiciously disbanded just weeks after the murder of JonBenet.

There was a direct link between APAC and the Ramsey and Stine families by way of NI, a 21-year-old caregiver for DS who lived at the Stine's house and was a member of APAC. NI regularly babysat DS, BR, and JBR and drove the three children to school.

My theory is that a "loose cannon" in APAC used high-profile JonBenet to send a message to America. To the best of my knowledge, none of the 29 APAC members were ever investigated.

BlueCrab

Click to expand...

Holdontoyourhat said:

Almost any variation on your theory would require the house to be 'cased' ahead of time, would it not?

Click to expand...

Holdontoyourhat said:

IMO, your opinion is based on an idea that you fabricated, and present here as if it were an actual observation. Whereas I quote directly from the perp's own words.

There have been no observations of Mrs. Ramsey angry at John's job. I'm not sure that a wife being angry with her husband would automatically lead to a child murder, anyway.

Click to expand...

BlueCrab said:

Holdontoyourhat,

No, not necessarily. In this version of my BDI theory BR and JBR knew the perp and let him into the house that night, perhaps on the pretext of being Santa's secret visit. NI's association with APAC members would have allowed the children to get to know one or more of the 29 members through normal social contacts as NI drove the kids around.

Click to expand...

Holdontoyourhat said:

The problem I have with this scenario is that I don't believe any foreign conspirator is going to go along with, trust, conspire with, etc., a 9 year old. Even a child-killer is going to have 2nd, 3rd, and 4th thoughts about that.

Click to expand...

BlueCrab said:

Hotyh,

APAC is not a foreign organization. Most of its members simply have Asian roots. APAC's goals were to promote the welfare of Asian Americans in the U.S., including the rectifying of perceived injustices against Asian American women. Thus, there is no "foreign conspirator" in my theory. However, APAC at Colorado University had a series of rather extreme speakers at the meetings in 1996 who promoted pro-active activities, which could have inspired a "loose cannon" member of APAC to do something dumb.

Click to expand...

Lacy Wood said:

HOTYH: The subjects of your threads tend to be issues you proselytize about. When someone posts a variation you tend to belittle them. Blue Crab played to your theme and gave you a possible scenario involving a "foreign" connection. You call that "dumb", but the points you attack are all more likely than contrasting points in your own theme. Your notion of a foreign serial killer(s) flitting into Boulder to the Ramsey home and then heading off without detection for some other continent to kill again is just one step above intergalactic killers. That, and accepting at face value a ransom note that is a prima facie decoy (there WAS no kidnapping), are not qualifiers for sitting in judgment of what is "dumb."

Click to expand...

Holdontoyourhat said:

Maybe you should actually read BlueCrab's post, where he characterizes the assisting perp as "doing something dumb".

I point out that 'dumb' doesn't reflect itself in the crime very well. IOW, 'dumb' implies fumbling stupidity whereas the crime displayed cold calm calculation and brutal violence, typical traits of SK's.

Click to expand...