807 users online (89 members and 718 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 5 of 81 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1207
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    I think that the type of diaper is not specified, so it seems that it could be a pull-up type diaper that 2 year olds often wear as part of the toilet training process and adjustment to underwear.
    No, it was a regular diaper because CY wouldn't let Shelly change her. It isn't important though. Either way, she can remove it herself. Did you see my earlier comments that she had wet her diaper after being put to bed?

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,981
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    A diaper is a diaper. I believe they would have specified pull-up if it was a pull-up. Does it matter? We know she was found with no diaper.
    It doesn't matter. It does look like there's a diaper on the floor of the child's bedroom.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    1,914
    Quote Originally Posted by JusticeFever View Post
    That reminds me, there was supposed to be papers from her job she was working on in bed, but they don't show up in any of the photos.
    None of the photos show that area where the body was. I believe the papers were near the dresser area or the nightstand next to her side of the bed. How awful.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,981
    Quote Originally Posted by SStarr33 View Post
    good question. I checked the autopsy report and didn't see that the eyes were examined.
    Do you recall whether Michelle's computer activity on the night of the murder was ever released? I've always been curious about that, as it is something that can be used to pinpoint the time of death.

  5. #65
    I just watched Silent Witness about this case. Lots of BS here:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/video/dateline/46912041

    FiFi has a starring role

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    Do you recall whether Michelle's computer activity on the night of the murder was ever released? I've always been curious about that, as it is something that can be used to pinpoint the time of death.
    For some reason I am remembering a comment about her sending an email that night, but not 100% sure. I will see if I can find it real quick.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    Do you recall whether Michelle's computer activity on the night of the murder was ever released? I've always been curious about that, as it is something that can be used to pinpoint the time of death.
    I would have to look it up to be positive, but somewhere close to 11:45 PM,

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,981
    Quote Originally Posted by SStarr33 View Post
    For some reason I am remembering a comment about her sending an email that night, but not 100% sure. I will see if I can find it real quick.
    I remember something about Michelle doing something with the laptop on the night of the murder ... but that idea was from prior to the first trial. If she was working, there should be time stamps recording when she last used the computer. If she was murdered closer to midnight (time of death is between midnight and 4:30 or 6AM), then it might be demonstrated by an abrupt end to her work.

  9. #69
    Was there an explanation why this ME could not nail down a time of death? Seems like they are way more specific in other cases.

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,981
    Quote Originally Posted by JusticeFever View Post
    I would have to look it up to be positive, but somewhere close to 11:45 PM,
    Thanks. So the last computer use for email (or all computer use?) was prior to the estimated time of death between midnight and 6AM. The time of death was adjusted to between midnight - 4:30AM. I wonder why the time of death wasn't adjusted to between 10:30PM and 4:30AM.


  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by SStarr33 View Post
    I just watched Silent Witness about this case. Lots of BS here:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/video/dateline/46912041

    FiFi has a starring role
    2:43 in part 1 of the video, shows the lower part of her leg and her foot. You can see the posterior livor that I mentioned a few days ago.

    Here is some info about livor mortis:

    http://books.google.com/books?id=XyG...mortis&f=false

    It says that it is not fixed until 8-12 hours after death, so if she was found face down and had posterior livor, it seems like that would mean she had recently been flipped over.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    26,981
    Quote Originally Posted by SStarr33 View Post
    2:43 in part 1 of the video, shows the lower part of her leg and her foot. You can see the posterior livor that I mentioned a few days ago.

    Here is some info about livor mortis:

    http://books.google.com/books?id=XyG...mortis&f=false

    It says that it is not fixed until 8-12 hours after death, so if she was found face down and had posterior livor, it seems like that would mean she had recently been flipped over.
    That's very interesting. Could she have been caught in the sheets, and her position changed when the child crawled into bed ... possibly shortly before Meredith arrived?

  13. #73
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,318
    Thanks everyone clearing up the Polaroid snaps in last thread.

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by otto View Post
    That's very interesting. Could she have been caught in the sheets, and her position changed when the child crawled into bed ... possibly shortly before Meredith arrived?
    I think a medical expert needs to address it specifically.

    I can think of a scenario but I can't talk about it here.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    9,345
    Quote Originally Posted by sunshine05 View Post
    It would have been irresponsible of them not to test it. I didn't get the impression at trial that they were suggesting that someone cleaned themselves there since no blood was found. I believed they were just showing that they did test it.
    There were two bloody adult shoe prints in the master bedroom but not outside of it. They went back later and actually seized boards from the deck. I think their theory was that the shoes were tossed out of the upstairs window onto the deck below and they hosed off and tossed everything into a trash bag from the kitchen.

    And their theory could still be right. The only reason the killer would have avoided using the bathrooms to wash off blood from their hands is if some of it was their own blood.

    They really owe it to Michelle and her children to re-run the unknown prints and DNA through national databases.

    JMO

Page 5 of 81 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 55 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Jason Young to get new trial #3
    By fran in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 1655
    Last Post: 06-19-2014, 06:58 PM
  2. Jason Young to get new trial #2
    By fran in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 1369
    Last Post: 06-05-2014, 11:47 AM
  3. Jason Young to get new trial
    By JusticeFever in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 1296
    Last Post: 05-09-2014, 04:40 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 05:53 PM
  5. POLL: Verdict Watch in Jason Young Trial #2
    By ynotdivein in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 03-04-2012, 01:18 PM

Tags for this Thread