645 users online (76 members and 569 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    225

    Manassas City police want to photograph teen in sexually explicit manner

    "A Manassas City teenager accused of “sexting” a video to his girlfriend is now facing a search warrant in which Manassas City police and Prince William County prosecutors want to take a photo of his erect penis, possibly forcing the teen to become erect by taking him to a hospital and giving him an injection, the teen’s lawyers said...."

    So, aren't they then producing child pornography themselves?

    More at link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...r-lawyers-say/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    21,430
    Oh, my word. I just can't even... with that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    60
    Too many questions...how old is he? What is the legal age of consent? Is he being charged as an adult?
    You shall not accept any information,
    unless you verify it for yourself.
    I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them.

    Holy Quran [17:36]

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by lavonne View Post
    Too many questions...how old is he? What is the legal age of consent? Is he being charged as an adult?
    He is 17, the girl is 15. The article seems to say he's being charged in juvenile court.

    The age of consent in Virginia is 18, with a close-in-age exception that allows teenagers aged 15 to 17 to engage in sexual acts but only with a partner younger than 18.

  5. #5
    Wait -- He is being charged with possession of child pornography and manufacturing child pornography. Both of these charges are because HE took a video of HIMSELF (possession of child pornography) and then sent it to someone else (manufacturing child pornography)?

    In essence, he committed the crimes to his own self and the state is prosecuting him for that?

    What the ????
    ^^^^^ My posts are all IMO, JMO, MOO unless I have included a link^^^^^

  6. #6
    Oh and for them to want to medically induce an erection....um...no. IMO that is just not ok. Not at all. Can you imagine the humiliation that would put him through?

    That is just wrong on so many levels to me.
    ^^^^^ My posts are all IMO, JMO, MOO unless I have included a link^^^^^

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    512
    Absolutely, this is going too far -- if we are getting the entire story here, it sounds like over-zealous prosecution and LE with nothing but time on their hands.

    Either you have a case or don't, and keep him on your "radar" if you must, but for pete's sake!
    HOPING I CAN HELP
    but, what if .... ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    14,189
    They are trying to force a confession. Who is going to compare pics? Do they have an expert? How ridiculous. The girl's mother went way too far in my opinion. Why ruin a teen's life when she can just ban her girl from going with him and watch her closely. If he then won't leave the girl alone, then she might call someone about that issue.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    8,281
    The charges stem from him sending pics of his ****** to a minor.........correct?
    I understand that but a pic of his privates taken by LE and a forced erection?
    dumb!!!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    30,559
    Not to get too graphic, but did anyone see the scene in Porky's where the gym teacher makes the boys submit to identification?

    Ok, time to get serious here. What difference does it make if it's his penis or someone else's? Sending porn is sending porn. Are they really that intent on getting him for manufacturing child porn by taking pictures of himself? They're over reaching here. Just drop that part.

    Also, why isn't the girl being charged? It doesn't say what she sent, but it sounds like her pictures were explicit too. JMO


    :emu:


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    16,202
    Sounds like he is denying that said penis is his and they want to retake a picture of his penis but they need it in an erect state for ID. idk jmo
    It's my opinion if no link provided.


    Misspellings due to fat fingers

    Words matter.

    You don't know what you don't know.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Richland, WA.
    Posts
    358
    As the hamster would say: "I just don't know where to go with that"!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,777
    This will never stand up in court...

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,481
    Quote Originally Posted by Hejlena View Post
    This will never stand up in court...


    Seriously, though -- what the HECK is wrong with you, America? What?!

    Why treat a kid like a pedophile for sending his GIRLFRIEND a rude picture? Why ruin his life and make hers hellish (I severely doubt SHE is a complainant..) when there's REAL criminals larking about freely in the world, actually *raping children* ???

    It's a sign of just how warped things are getting, IMO.
    _____________
    Everything I have posted at this website, past or present, represents my opinion or my understanding of events based on facts that are publicly available.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    6,481
    In new news, the police have decided not to force the child to get an erection.

    And while the girl in question apparently initiated the exchange of rudie pics, SHE is not being charged.

    Foster said the case began when the teen’s 15-year-old girlfriend sent photos of herself to the 17-year-old, who in turn sent her the video in question. The girl has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video, Foster said

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...r-lawyers-say/
    _____________
    Everything I have posted at this website, past or present, represents my opinion or my understanding of events based on facts that are publicly available.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-23-2015, 10:44 AM
  2. Replies: 950
    Last Post: 11-11-2010, 09:30 PM
  3. Confiscated monkey sent sexually explicit audio tapes by Plano owner
    By PlasmaFiend024 in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-02-2007, 06:52 PM