1290 users online (264 members and 1026 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 21 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 304
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,285

    Arrow Jodi Arias Legal Question and Answer Thread *no discussion* #2

    Do you have a legal question for our verified attorneys? Post them here for an answer. This is a *no discussion/ question and answer thread*

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,285
    reminder: the questions can only be answered by our verified attorneys.. not by posters. Our verified attorneys posting on this case are:

    Gitana1
    Minor4th
    Mormon Attorney
    Azlawyer

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    sipping coffee at the Purple Rose Theatre
    Posts
    53,285
    I will go first:

    What to make of the testimony of Gus? What is going on with this?

    Do you think the PA will move to impeach his entire testimony?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,161

    Jodi Arias Legal Question and Answer Thread *no discussion* #2

    Please post your questions here.....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    1,820
    YesorNo posted this in another thread this afternoon, AZlawyer. She asked me to repost it here. Please excuse me if the format is skewed:



    Quote Originally Posted by Curious in Indiana View Post
    Starting bid $500? So is that what Travis' life has been reduced to? Can't the courts in AZ stop this madness!
    BBM seems that the court should be able to stop it:

    "...C. An inmate shall not send mail to or receive mail from a communication service provider or remote computing service. The department shall impose appropriate sanctions, including reducing or denying earned release credits, against an inmate if either of the following applies:

    1. The inmate corresponds or attempts to correspond with a communication service provider or remote computing service.

    2. Any person accesses the provider's or service's internet web site at the inmate's request..."

    http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument....31&DocType=ARS

    But- what do I know.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by janx View Post
    YesorNo posted this in another thread this afternoon, AZlawyer. She asked me to repost it here. Please excuse me if the format is skewed:



    Quote Originally Posted by Curious in Indiana View Post
    Starting bid $500? So is that what Travis' life has been reduced to? Can't the courts in AZ stop this madness!
    BBM seems that the court should be able to stop it:

    "...C. An inmate shall not send mail to or receive mail from a communication service provider or remote computing service. The department shall impose appropriate sanctions, including reducing or denying earned release credits, against an inmate if either of the following applies:

    1. The inmate corresponds or attempts to correspond with a communication service provider or remote computing service.

    2. Any person accesses the provider's or service's internet web site at the inmate's request..."

    http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument....31&DocType=ARS

    But- what do I know.
    First of all, JA is not in prison yet, because she hasn't been sentenced. Second, that statute was (correctly) found unconstitutional pretty quickly after it was enacted.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by AZlawyer View Post
    First of all, JA is not in prison yet, because she hasn't been sentenced. Second, that statute was (correctly) found unconstitutional pretty quickly after it was enacted.
    Too bad.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by Curious in Indiana View Post
    Too bad.
    Well, I can't agree with "too bad," because I really like the Constitution, but I agree that not everyone with a First Amendment right makes the best of it. Much like not everyone with access to oxygen makes the best of it *cough cough JA*.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    166
    Do you think that all the sealed hearings will be unsealed at the end of this trial or will they remain sealed pending all appeals?

    Asking because I really really want to know what was going on back there.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by TDoc72 View Post
    Do you think that all the sealed hearings will be unsealed at the end of this trial or will they remain sealed pending all appeals?

    Asking because I really really want to know what was going on back there.
    Good question. My guess is that they will remain sealed in case a retrial is necessary. But it's tough to know without knowing the reason(s) so many things were sealed. I think the judge got a little "seal-happy" about halfway through...

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Middle TN
    Posts
    1,258
    I don't understand why the need to keep things sealed in case of a retrial. What kinds of things could never see the light of day?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by Renee110 View Post
    I don't understand why the need to keep things sealed in case of a retrial. What kinds of things could never see the light of day?
    Well, I didn't say never--I said in case of a retrial. So, for example, if there was something very inflammatory about Jodi that the judge deemed irrelevant, the discussions about that evidence would probably be kept sealed through the appeal process so that any retrial jury would not hear of it.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    4
    Will Arias, now that she is a convicted murderer, have to wear her black and white stripes in this sentencing trial? I believe that if she is allowed to wear street clothes, it will not be an accurate representation of her.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    7,757
    Quote Originally Posted by NERN View Post
    Will Arias, now that she is a convicted murderer, have to wear her black and white stripes in this sentencing trial? I believe that if she is allowed to wear street clothes, it will not be an accurate representation of her.
    No. Technically she hasn't been convicted yet, as no sentence has been imposed.

    "It would seem to me that June 16, 2008 was the last time that the victim was viewed by her grandparents. It became quite evident that from the OS of the Defense that the 16th was a date of great importance and that a so called time line of activities dealing with CA, LA, GA and ICA on the 16th and what, if any, activities took place on the 15th, 16th and 17th of June on 24 hour cycles would have been, at least, of a minimal requirement of review. I take it at some point you had a computer expert look at that data?" HHJP, 6/21/11
    http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...139910&page=94

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    8,913
    This is the first case I have ever heard about where a defendent openly asked and wants her attorney to be replaced, and the attorney (Nurmi) openly admitted he doesnt like the defendent.

    My question is does the judge have a legal basis to refuse the defendent's request to want another attorney?
    Especially when both of them don't want each other.


    I am honestly amazed at this, and not sure about the legal part of the judge refusing to allow him to be replaced when both want him replaced.

Page 1 of 21 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Discussion thread for Jodi Arias Journals
    By Tricia in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 405
    Last Post: 03-27-2016, 03:49 AM
  2. *graphic and adult content* Jodi Arias Trial media/ timeline thread **no discussion**
    By TigerBalm in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 1591
    Last Post: 04-26-2015, 05:25 AM
  3. Jodi Arias Legal Question and Answer Thread *no discussion*
    By nursebeeme in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 2446
    Last Post: 09-12-2014, 09:30 PM
  4. legal question and answer thread **no discussion**
    By nursebeeme in forum Michelle Young
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 03-02-2012, 07:47 PM
  5. Question and Answer Thread **No Discussion**
    By kbl8201 in forum Jaycee Lee Dugard
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 11-02-2009, 12:21 AM

Tags for this Thread