754 users online (67 members and 687 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 191
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    652
    Quote Originally Posted by JusticeFever View Post
    New at WRAL: 10/23/14
    Jason Young's former attorney, Mike Klinkosum, will now represent Michael Peterson in his second trial

    http://www.wral.com/mike-peterson-ge...rial/14109012/

    Peterson refused a plea deal that would give him no jail time if he accepted a 2nd degree murder charge,,
    Ugh... I can't stand Klinkosum. He represented Teghan Skiba's killer this past March/April at the trial in Smithfield. I could do without seeing him, IMHO. But I do hope that if granted there will be a 3rd trial and no plea.
    JUSTICE FOR MICHELLE AND RYLAN


    All posts, unless sourced, are my opinion only and they are to remain here in Websleuths and are not to be used elsewhere. Thank you!!!!

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    We should hear something in the next 10 days, unless Jason's attorney decides to file an extension......

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Jason's attorney did file an extension until 12/23/14....will post link tomorrow..

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Here is the link for the extension filed by Jason's attorney,Barbara Blackman

    http://www.ncappellatecourts.org/sho...ment_id=162630

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    I finally got around to reading the brief the state filed. This reminds me so much of the Cooper case, in the way that things are documented and not always correctly.

    For instance, they say that MY was cutting back to part time at work. False. She was working on a plan to keep her full time job status and benefits by working longer hours and also from home , and through emails. Her boss testified to a outline she made at the trial.

    Also, in another part they are trying to say Cindy Beaver was confused about what day she saw the car at/near the Young house in the early hours of Nov. 3th. Also, false.

    See, its things like this they make me distrust their case. JMO

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,974
    See, its things like this they make me distrust their
    You are mistaken. Michelle requested to change to part time status. Her boss explicitly testified to this fact.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Quote Originally Posted by Boodles View Post
    You are mistaken. Michelle requested to change to part time status. Her boss explicitly testified to this fact.
    Then you might want to watch this video... testimony of Michelle Young's employer.Paul Matthews at Progress Energy.
    http://www.wral.com/specialreports/m...video/9734055/

    Michelle submitted a proposal that would allow her to work 30 hours a week at the office , 10 hours on Tues, Wed, Thurs, and still be reached on Mondays by emails or voicemail where she could check in from home.
    Fridays were already called Flex Fridays.
    The reason for this proposal was that she wanted to still maintain her full time benefits and health insurance. while losing only 10 hours from her normal schedule.

    If Michelle wanted to cut back to part time without keeping the additional full time benefits, she simply would have done so, and there would have been no need for this proposal.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,974
    I completely understand what was testified to. You are misunderstanding. <mod snip> The brief was not incorrect, as you alleged. She had proposed switching to part time status. That's that, period, so I won't comment further.
    Last edited by Tricia; 11-26-2014 at 02:38 PM. Reason: please do not attack poster

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Michelle's proposal of part time was to only cut her working hours by 10 hours which the state wants us to believe was a motive for Jason to murder her.

    10 hours, yet being able to keep all full time benefits.

    Part time employment usually falls in the 20-24 hours per week category, 30 hours would be well over that,,and, it was 30 hours plus being able to be reached on a day off!!!

    Now, if Michelle was going to quit her job altogether and stay home to be a full time mom, that may have helped the state's motive, but to decrease her workload by a mere 10 hours really doesn't work.

    Also, something else to consider....If Michelle was only going to come into the office 3 days a week, she would be home with her daughter so there would be less money spent on her daycare as well!

    Glad you understood, it really isn't that complicated, and I provided the link to the testimony where it was all explained!!

  10. #40
    Madeleine74's Avatar
    Madeleine74 is offline Of course it's my opinion; who else's would it be?
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    10,269
    Many companies consider "full time" as over 30 hours and some specify over 32 hours to be full-time, so it's variable. The point that was trying to be made, that the state's brief can't be trusted because the state was wrong to say Michelle was proposing or planning to go part time, is strange, because 30 hours absolutely can be considered to be part-time, and it's not incorrect to use that verbiage to describe it.


  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    Why didn't the state just tell the truth, that Michelle's hours and paycheck would simply be decreased by 10 hours, instead of making it sound like she was cutting her hours in half or worse and this would be a financial hardship on the family and a motive for her murder?


    JMO

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,156
    where I work, it's 25 hours, crazy as that seems

    Quote Originally Posted by Madeleine74 View Post
    Many companies consider "full time" as over 30 hours and some specify over 32 hours to be full-time, so it's variable. The point that was trying to be made, that the state's brief can't be trusted because the state was wrong to say Michelle was proposing or planning to go part time, is strange, because 30 hours absolutely can be considered to be part-time, and it's not incorrect to use that verbiage to describe it.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    N.C., USA
    Posts
    3,252
    Well, IMO using the correct verbiage makes it impossible to say 'Why didn't the state just tell the truth'

    Since it was correct then it is not an un-truth.
    The Seeker / Sports Freak /

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    575
    "Yawn" I see I haven't missed much. Still the same old stabs at the State/Prosecutors Office.........as if all kinds of discussion, accusations, etc will just wipe away his guilt. It won't however.....it really won't.
    JUSTICE FOR MICHELLE & RYLAN

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,363
    It's not whether someone thinks someone is guilty or innocent, as it is about presenting events in the recent brief the state filed to be fair and factual.

    The state's position on Michelle's cutting back work hours in their brief is listed as a possible motive as to why Jason might want her dead.

    For 10 hours less at work = 10 hours decrease in pay=murder

    The state tried very hard to make this about financial issues the Youngs were having, when it was proven in court that they weren't having any difficulties at all.

Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1914
    Last Post: 12-08-2017, 07:54 PM
  2. Breaking news in the LISK case
    By Justiceforever in forum News, TV & Radio related to LISK (excluding TKS)
    Replies: 789
    Last Post: 11-24-2016, 04:06 PM
  3. State files motion to proceed with check fraudUPDATE CASE TO BE SCHEDULED
    By countzero in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 640
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 11:17 AM
  4. Dr. Vass on Cold Case files today!
    By gamom in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-14-2011, 11:50 PM
  5. Breaking News..Casey to appear in court today
    By bananarama in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 03:54 PM

Tags for this Thread