910 users online (169 members and 741 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 30 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 449
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    31,655

    JLM: When will charges come in the HG and MH cases?

    I was asked to open a thread to discuss/speculate about the as of yet absent murder charges against JLM in the Hannah Graham and Morgan Harrington cases.

    Will they come? When? Why the hold up?
    PODCAST ROW

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK
    __________________________________
    Always give generously of yourself to support your beliefs. And when you're knocked down, give more.




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    37,777
    Thanks, I have been wondering what the delay in charging JM is, especially with regards to Morgan. For years it has appeared, at least to me, that all LE needed was someone to match DNA with. They must have had that back to check JM's against crime scene, probably in both cases, for some time now. What else can they expect to find in Morgan's case that will be enough, or what is holding them back? Also in Hannah's case, but especially Morgan's, after all of these years?
    Just my opinion, of course.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    11,853
    I was thinking toxicology tests for Hannah was the delay for one (6 wks plus condition of remains more delay) Slam him with two murders for starts & well... DNA links to other crimes as another thought.

    jmo

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    37,777
    But he was linked to the Fairfax victim by DNA years ago. I am wondering why no movement on her case, I guess.
    Just my opinion, of course.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    3,273
    Quote Originally Posted by cluciano63 View Post
    Thanks, I have been wondering what the delay in charging JM is, especially with regards to Morgan. For years it has appeared, at least to me, that all LE needed was someone to match DNA with. They must have had that back to check JM's against crime scene, probably in both cases, for some time now. What else can they expect to find in Morgan's case that will be enough, or what is holding them back? Also in Hannah's case, but especially Morgan's, after all of these years?
    I actually think at this point they may only have circumstantial evidence in the MH case. The DNA they would have run would have come from the shirt they found, and even with a match that only shows contact. We don't know if the DNA is sweat, or semen, or blood... When they announced the connection they specifically said "forensic link" over DNA match which makes me wonder if its something else they found...i have a theory that perhaps when MH purse was found, they were able to recover "fibers" on it...and I think when JMs cab was seized those fibers matched ones found in his cab. Though both of these are strong, and prove her presence in that cab its not enough to prove he abducted or killed her...and I think that's why, as of yet, we have not seen charges.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by cluciano63 View Post
    Thanks, I have been wondering what the delay in charging JM is, especially with regards to Morgan. For years it has appeared, at least to me, that all LE needed was someone to match DNA with. They must have had that back to check JM's against crime scene, probably in both cases, for some time now. What else can they expect to find in Morgan's case that will be enough, or what is holding them back? Also in Hannah's case, but especially Morgan's, after all of these years?
    I would think that because there isn't a statute of limitations on rape or murder in VA, they don't feel the need to start the clock ticking on the MH & HG cases. He's in jail, no bond and about to go to trial for the Fairfax case - in other words, he's going nowhere right now.

    When they do charge him with either or, it becomes an issue of his right to a speedy trial etc. The added factor is the outcome of the Fairfax case. If he is convicted on that case, I believe they would push to make either MH or HG trial a DP trial due to prior conviction. I hope LE's thought is, "why rush it and miss something?" At least I hope it's that and not due to lack of evidence. All JMO.

  7. #7
    http://www.patc.com/weeklyarticles/dna-timeline.shtml

    I don't know where to put this link, but it's a good point of reference for a Forensic timeline evaluation.

  8. #8
    My theory on this is that they would like (or may need) a conviction on the rape case because the DNA link to Morgan Harrington won't be of any use if they don't have that conviction. Put it this way, if JLM's DNA was associated with the Fairfax victim, and he was exonerated of the charges somehow, trying to use that same DNA evidence in a murder trial would be tough. They might have to go at it a different way. That's just a guess on my part. I also don't think they are in any hurry to charge JLM. He isn't going anywhere.

    Another reason could be this:
    "In some situations, if a defendant loses at trial or takes a plea offer, a judge may use a defendant's prior conviction to enhance his or her sentence."
    http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/c...against-me.htm

    This could be a way to get a longer sentence in the murder cases if they need to.
    Just the facts, Ma'am.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    570
    My best guess is next year around jan-may 2015.. he is going to be in and out of court a lot. I think they're building a strong case, I think his back log of murders is deeper than we expect and each one needs to have him there in way to say he did them.. I do think he will break on MH case or maybe other case he did. He is looking at the death penalty for sure, I don't know what kind of guy he is , But I do know what kind of guy his lawyer is.

    I'm being kind with next year timing, maybe 2016 if they combine these new suspected murders/rapes cases and the way his lawyer work.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    37,777
    In a crime show I watched earlier today, an old Dateline I think, LE obtained a LWOP on a case, so they did not prosecute another murder case linked by DNA. Maybe to save money, not sure. They figured they had him locked up anyway? Hate to think that but may be true.

    While I don't like that being a scenario here, I also do not feel comfortable with three trials, for example, simply because two of them were "high profile" either. It doesn't feel right, Imo, unless every victim of every murder gets a trial for their own justice. But I also know it likely does not work that way. Jmo
    Just my opinion, of course.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    6,652
    Underwater Search Dogs: How crime canines were used in the Hannah Graham case
    Garo Search Video
    By ABC 7 News November 4, 2014 - 11:16 am http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/11...se-108730.html

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,387
    There could be any number of reasons we have not heard additional charges against JLM as of yet in the MH and HG cases. I suspect a careful consideration and review of evidence takes much longer than any of us WS 'ers can imagine. Looking at DNA, found evidence, going over witness testimony/ interviews, etc. all takes time and a very deliberate choice about what charges will stick and what they believe they can best support w/ evidence. I also believe that the timing of when those charges will be handed down has a lot to do with coordination surrounding his Fairfax case.
    One thing that I do feel confident about is that there will be more charges and the time it takes to hear those charges is NOT due to lack of evidence. Last statement is my own gut instinct.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    238
    I think that it might not be so much 'lack of evidence' as, 'lack of certainty that they have all the evidence that they can get.'

    There are several factors here. One is, that JM is safely locked up for the forseeable future. Another is, that they have charged him with the Fairfax rape, and probably feel confident that they have every bit of evidence. They have the victim's testimony; they have DNA evidence; they have eyewitnesses to her state immediately after the attack; they have medical records. The third factor is Virginia's rule that they must bring a case to trial in five months. When they have JM locked up, and going to trial on one charge, what possible incentive would they have to rush to charge him on other charges, and start the clock ticking against themselves?

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    222
    I've been thinking about the Greta van Susteren show that had the two ex-LE guys doing some brainstorming at the crime scene behind the cottage at 3193. Also the statement from Coy Barefoot's tipster who called in the report of buzzards on Oct 6. In each of those narratives, reference or inference was made to thick woods behind the cottage, as in, between the cottage and the location of Hannah's remains.

    Can you imagine trying to carry a lifeless body, over your shoulder, through the trees in an area like that without leaving some evidence behind that you were there? Seems like he would have gotten caught by every little stray tree limb, every briar and bramble. He'd have had twigs in his hair, would have left pulled hairs and fibers on tiny twigs and branches that were still on the trees, both his hair and Hannah's, most likely. I swear I believe that evidence would have been left behind, and probably plenty of it.

    Of course, he did have some number of days to check behind himself and remove evidence of having been there, I guess, but I find it difficult to believe that he could have been as thorough as he would have needed to be. Plus, every time he went there in daylight, if in fact he did, he took a chance of being seen.

    I imagine that LE is just biding their time and building a stronger case. I believe they already have evidence that ties him to the crime, via the crime scene. Imo.

    ETA: I just had a sickening thought. The pants. omg. The pants were there, near her body, because he took them off her there. He actually did rape her right there in the woods. Who chokes a woman unconscious, rapes her, and then takes the time to put pants back on her? Imo.

    Where are Hannah's shoes?
    Last edited by jbowman55; 11-05-2014 at 12:31 PM.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by jbowman55 View Post
    I've been thinking about the Greta van Susteren show that had the two ex-LE guys doing some brainstorming at the crime scene behind the cottage at 3193. Also the statement from Coy Barefoot's tipster who called in the report of buzzards on Oct 6. In each of those narratives, reference or inference was made to thick woods behind the cottage, as in, between the cottage and the location of Hannah's remains.

    Can you imagine trying to carry a lifeless body, over your shoulder, through the trees in an area like that without leaving some evidence behind that you were there? Seems like he would have gotten caught by every little stray tree limb, every briar and bramble. He'd have had twigs in his hair, would have left pulled hairs and fibers on tiny twigs and branches that were still on the trees, both his hair and Hannah's, most likely. I swear I believe that evidence would have been left behind, and probably plenty of it.

    Of course, he did have some number of days to check behind himself and remove evidence of having been there, I guess, but I find it difficult to believe that he could have been as thorough as he would have needed to be. Plus, every time he went there in daylight, if in fact he did, he took a chance of being seen.

    I imagine that LE is just biding their time and building a stronger case. I believe they already have evidence that ties him to the crime, via the crime scene. Imo.

    ETA: I just had a sickening thought. The pants. omg. The pants were there, near her body, because he took them off her there. He actually did rape her right there in the woods. Who chokes a woman unconscious, rapes her, and then takes the time to put pants back on her? Imo.

    Where are Hannah's shoes?
    I have had that thought for a while (about the pants). I think she was either so out of it in the car that she posed no issue in terms of escape OR he punched her out. Then, he arrived at the location, forced her to walk with him to the place where her body was found, and then raped and murdered her. The pants are the clue.....unless he carried them to site where he left HG's body and left them there for some reason. I just realized that this is OT for this thread...but I do think that the pants being there alongside of the remains provides one logical conclusion: HG was raped and murdered in that spot. JMO. And if that is the case, there was hopfully evidence remaining there from JM himself. The weeks between the murder and the remains being found were often rainy and leaves were falling.

Page 1 of 30 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 549
    Last Post: 11-29-2017, 05:35 AM
  2. Germany Crime Cases - Links to cases on Websleuths *No Discussion*
    By imamaze in forum International Case Index
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-26-2016, 08:43 AM
  3. Holland Crime Cases - Links to cases on Websleuths *No Discussion*
    By imamaze in forum International Case Index
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-01-2016, 04:29 PM
  4. Finland Crime Cases - Links to cases on Websleuths *No Discussion*
    By imamaze in forum International Case Index
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-18-2015, 11:20 PM

Tags for this Thread