GUILTY TX - Christina Morris, 23, Plano, 30 August 2014 - #31 *Arrest*

Christina Marie Morris



https://www.facebook.com/PlanoTexas...0.1411353182./728779757195555/?type=1&theater



North Texas Crime Stoppers






Media/Timeline Thread

Thread 1

Thread 2

Thread 3

Thread 4

Thread 5

Thread 6

Thread 7

Thread 8

Thread 9

Thread 10

Thread 11

Thread 12

Thread 13

Thread 14

Thread 15

Thread 16

Thread 17

Thread 18

Thread 19

Thread 20

Thread 21

Thread 22

Thread 23

Thread 24

Thread 25

Thread 26

Thread 27

Thread 28

Thread 29

Thread 30

Thread 31









The Rules

Facebook

Social Networks

Regarding Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking or blog websites: Links may be used to direct posters to view something on a social networking page. But postings on social networking sites are not considered fact; they are rumor. Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed. Paraphrasing is okay. (Exception: If the Twitter or Facebook post belongs to a verified news station, it may be copied. But a link should still be provided.)

Also, social networking pages may only be linked if they are directly related to a case, i.e. the victim or suspect. We don't want to post to someone's mother, brother, employer, milkman, or postal carrier just because they know the main player. We also NEVER link to minor's pages (unless they are the victim). And be sure that the page actually belongs to the person being discussed. Do not link to someone if you are not 100% sure it is the correct person. And if a social networking is set to private and you get in the back way, you may not post what you find. Private means private!


Organized Efforts- Email Campaigns-Boycotts-Petitions:

Obviously members are free to take up any and all causes that are important to them in an effort to bring about change. But using Websleuths as a platform to promote organized efforts such as email campaigns, boycotts, letter writing,etc. are strictly forbidden without the consent of the forum owners.If you have written a letter or taken any action in support of a cause, please refrain from posting about it. Support of a particular cause must be approved by the owners prior to posting links or information regarding any such effort. Causes can be questionable in nature, even though they appear to be honorable on the surface.As it relates to using WS as a platform for promotion,the owners investigate the nature and source of such campaigns and make their own decisions as to the legitimacy of each cause. Please do not suggest,directly or indirectly, that members support any type of organized effort without getting approval from forum owners first.

Discussing Donations, Fundraising etc. is not allowed without the permission of the owners.


Please continue here...

Please continue here for Christina




https://www.facebook.com/helpfindchristinamorris/timeline

https://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/2...llow_share=true&escape=false&view_mode=scroll

https://cbsdallas.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/380-s20141213-1enrique-dna-return.pdf

https://cbsdallas.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/380a-20141212-arrest-10-sw-arrest-return-sealed.pdf

catpatrol's timeline

catpatrol's map

Radio Show discussion

Discovery ID Discussion

They said it was MORE LIKELY a body fluid.
They did not say it WAS a body fluid!

If they had a body fluid there why not say so?
Why the dance with words?

Eileen730 said:

They said it was MORE LIKELY a body fluid.
They did not say it WAS a body fluid!

If they had a body fluid there why not say so?
Why the dance with words?

Click to expand...

I think they only wanted to use the words they had to, again just not to give away too much info. I'm betting it was blood, too - that's why the "significant amount" bothers me. EA wouldn't have to have used bleach on saliva, would he? They probably did do Luminol, IMO. He seriously tried to clean that car, even used a shop vac on it.

I had posted a trunk photo awhile back that HAD the glowing trunk release. But have since found some that I do not see that glowing trunk release

Happyshoes said:

I think they only wanted to use the words they had to, again just not to give away too much info. I'm betting it was blood, too - that's why the "significant amount" bothers me. EA wouldn't have to have used bleach on saliva, would he? They probably did do Luminol, IMO. He seriously tried to clean that car, even used a shop vac on it.

Click to expand...

It would have to be something he could see (and smell) to clean, imo. Blood or vomit, but not saliva.

Eileen730 said:

They said it was MORE LIKELY a body fluid.
They did not say it WAS a body fluid!

If they had a body fluid there why not say so?
Why the dance with words?

Click to expand...

Because the prosecution is not going to show their hand. The warrant included just enough information to get the arrest and charge. They have A LOT MORE that we aren't privy to and most likely won't be until trial.

I just went over catpatrol's timeline (which is amazingly helpful), and find it disturbing that it took until 12/5 to get the cadaver dogs into the garage. Why didn't they do that sooner??

SeriouslySearching said:

It would have to be something he could see (and smell) to clean, imo. Blood or vomit, but not saliva.

Click to expand...

Yes, and I doubt there would be significant amounts of saliva, either. Another note off of cat's timeline is the fact that he was trying to clean that car for weeks on end. And the Odoban has always bothered me. He wasn't trying to just get a fresh scent in his car, he was desperate to get the smell of blood and/or death out of his car. I am concerned about the "unknown male dna" as well, but I suspect that could just be EA's or maybe some other guy that he gave a ride to, possibly his brother. This is all MOO.

Bringing part of post by SaintGirl from end of last thread:

"Can I assume that's the biggest problem you have with this scenario but not the only? "

Ha! I don't think that's even the biggest problem I have with this scenario -- just the one on which I chose to focus. [emoji4]

Happyshoes said:

I just went over catpatrol's timeline (which is amazingly helpful), and find it disturbing that it took until 12/5 to get the cadaver dogs into the garage. Why didn't they do that sooner??

Click to expand...

My guess is they have on video Christina getting into his car alive and do not see her, EA or his car return to the garage again. Which they/it probably didn't. Plano PD is not the Keystone Cop.

I am missing a few things.
I have been looking over the MSM and Affidavits.
Where & When did he shop vac at?
Where and When did he use the cleaning products on specifically to his car?
I see the items of empty containers found in the garbage collections.
I can see how this will be defended.
Sorry guys..but unless there is more significant proof that he purchased all those products for his sole use -for only the intent to hide,conceal and destroy evidence in the car..it will not fly in a trial. JMO~
I feel this is not going to be usable.
Even though we would want it to be a justification ..it is not IMO.
A lying - He is proven to be.
but it is not enough for a conviction.

I hope they have more than whats in the affidavit

txyorkiemom said:

I am missing a few things.
I have been looking over the MSM and Affidavits.
Where & When did he shop vac at?
Where and When did he use the cleaning products on specifically to his car?
I see the items of empty containers found in the garbage collections.
I can see how this will be defended.
Sorry guys..but unless there is more significant proof that he purchased all those products for his sole use -for only the intent to hide,conceal and destroy evidence in the car..it will not fly in a trial. JMO~
I feel this is not going to be usable.
Even though we would want it to be a justification ..it is not IMO.
A lying - He is proven to be.
but it is not enough for a conviction.

Click to expand...

While it isn't going to be known probably until trial...LE would certainly test the car, garage, and his clothes (shoes etc) for those particular products to tie them into cleaning his car and DNA/fingerprints on them as they were found in the trash since they were specific about them in the SW.

txyorkiemom said:

I am missing a few things.
I have been looking over the MSM and Affidavits.
Where & When did he shop vac at?
Where and When did he use the cleaning products on specifically to his car?
I see the items of empty containers found in the garbage collections.
I can see how this will be defended.
Sorry guys..but unless there is more significant proof that he purchased all those products for his sole use -for only the intent to hide,conceal and destroy evidence in the car..it will not fly in a trial. JMO~
I feel this is not going to be usable.
Even though we would want it to be a justification ..it is not IMO.
A lying - He is proven to be.
but it is not enough for a conviction.

Click to expand...

I can see you point however I'm certain LE has the proof they need especially since they were able to get a $1mil bond. It would be awful if they really didn't. Surely there able to match the cleaning products to the car by testing.

SeriouslySearching said:

While it isn't going to be known probably until trial...LE would certainly test the car, garage, and his clothes (shoes etc) for those particular products to tie them into cleaning his car and DNA/fingerprints on them as they were found in the trash since they were specific about them in the SW.

Click to expand...

Right, but is it a crime to clean your car? That's what the defense will say.

txyorkiemom said:

I am missing a few things.
I have been looking over the MSM and Affidavits.
Where & When did he shop vac at?
Where and When did he use the cleaning products on specifically to his car?
I see the items of empty containers found in the garbage collections.
I can see how this will be defended.
Sorry guys..but unless there is more significant proof that he purchased all those products for his sole use -for only the intent to hide,conceal and destroy evidence in the car..it will not fly in a trial. JMO~
I feel this is not going to be usable.
Even though we would want it to be a justification ..it is not IMO.
A lying - He is proven to be.
but it is not enough for a conviction.

Click to expand...

Agreed on all points.
And as a side note, (fwiw) when I use cleaning supplies and finish the bottles, I put them in my own garbage.