1270 users online (237 members and 1033 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 33 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 490
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160

    Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 27, Part 2

    Please continue your discussion here.


    This is for OUR #1 witness.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The Dark Side
    Posts
    7,491
    Phew! Good timing!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    668
    Thanks for the smooth transmission LambChop!

    For a minute there, I didn't think you'd care how we FEEEEEEEEL (sarcasm)
    Everything is my opinion, unless I tell you it's not.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,532

    I am bringing it over from the last thread

    . . . .Standing O . . . . . .Deanna and Ziggy . . . . . . . ❤️ My Heroes for the Day! ❤️


    (`v)
    `*..*
    . .*).*)
    (.(. (.(.`..♥





    "She loved him so much that this is what she did to him, there are no mitigating circumstances in this case. None, the only just punishment is death."

    "The time for honouring yourself, will soon be at an end. . .highness"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    Quote Originally Posted by EquallyDivided View Post
    Thanks for the smooth transmission LambChop!

    For a minute there, I didn't think you'd care how we FEEEEEEEEL (sarcasm)
    Of course I care. You are the best posters E_V_E_R!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Rochester, New York
    Posts
    30,559
    I've missed the trial for a few days and am getting caught up. I'm finally reading today's testimony and just came across this gem:

    JW asks if she was ever misleading in her interviews.


    DR: "The only one who is being misleading is you."


    Can't wait to read more. Also BK has the letter to TA's family posted. I'll probably read that too before coming back here.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    11,853
    Rickshawfan, last thread you asked if Det. Smith was taking Flores place tomorrow (re: jensdiaries tweet I posted). Detective Smith is the computer forensic guy for the state. Juan will probably clear up a lot of porn issues, tampering, etc...with this expert. jmo

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,779
    Too bad Deanna couldn't answer JW today when she asked if she had brought the audio with her "no but my lawyer did" and some attorney in the courtroom turned it over. Imagine JW having to deal with that audio on the fly! JSS would never have allowed that to happen but it would have been epic.



    I still can't believe JW actually said that to DR just to be sarcastic and snippy. Along with the other things she tried to copy from JM. It's not like DR had spent days on end on the stand spewing lies. She had been on there for less than a half hour with JM and she got under JW's skin with one comment shortly into their exchange. Priceless. And JW went after her like that even after whining to the judge and having DR admonished. So unprofessional. JM likely would have had that audio there just in case if the shoe was on the other foot. That's how prepared he usually is...for anything. Can't wait for the release of the video of this trial.

    MOO

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berkshires, MA
    Posts
    1,632

    UGH-lost my comments on Deanna's testimony

    when the thread closed. I really hate that. But I saw katydid captured much of my comment:

    I bet that DR worked this out with JM beforehand. I don't think she would have done this and gone out on a limb all by herself. I am sure they knew that JW was going to try and call her out as a 'liar' from the interview. So they blocked them and insisted upon an audio version, which points out her distrust of the DT. Which is understandable, because she just got through testifying that she was out of the country during the time they first accused her of being in a physical fight with TA.

    So she sounds logical and rational when she says, " let me hear the audio--did you bring it with you? " LOL -WELL PLAYED!!!!!
    I thought the same thing.

    I was also thinking back to my litigation firm days and, as I recall, after a deposition of a witness you would send them the transcript for review and correction. And there were corrections. No one is perfect and words aren't always transcribed correctly. I get the impression DR was never provided with the transcript or asked to approve it as correct. Or else JW would have said that. So, yes, there is every reason to refuse to answer questions based upon an "alleged" transcript of her words.

    I too think Juan knew this was going to happen and was in on it-not that it was wrong or anything-she had every right to do what she did. I also wonder if the abrupt end today was because JSS told them to bring the audio. Hope springs eternal that JSS would take a position against something the defense did.

    I also like how all this is illustrating that nothing the defense does should be trusted. Their witnesses LIE-that's kind of important. The affidavits are useless. Everything they say is suspect.



    BOYTWNMOM
    Three things cannot long be hidden the sun, the moon, and the truth. -Confucious

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    846
    Wow, what a day! So much to comment on: the defense finally rests, Deanna's polite snark to JW. She is so impressive and, like others noted on the previous thread, embodies truth, decency, and integrity, all qualities that the DT's witnesses so obviously lacked. I'm sure the jury can't help comparing the quality of the prosecution's witnesses to those the DT offered.

    My favourite JM sarcasm of today: email by homing pigeon. Gotta love him.

    Anyway, I've got some work to do before bed, so I'll lurk you all tomorrow.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    846
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Know? View Post
    Rickshawfan, last thread you asked if Det. Smith was taking Flores place tomorrow (re: jensdiaries tweet I posted). Detective Smith is the computer forensic guy for the state. Juan will probably clear up a lot of porn issues, tampering, etc...with this expert. jmo
    (Geez, I can't stay away). What I admire about Juan is how he so effortlessly dismantles all the bs and lies that the DT spent so much time and energy (and dollars) constructing. He never breaks a sweat, never gets flustered, never gets the JW deer-in-the-headlights look. Instead, he makes it seem like brushing away an ant.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    CT/NC
    Posts
    21,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Boytwnmom View Post
    when the thread closed. I really hate that. But I saw katydid captured much of my comment:



    I thought the same thing.

    I was also thinking back to my litigation firm days and, as I recall, after a deposition of a witness you would send them the transcript for review and correction. And there were corrections. No one is perfect and words aren't always transcribed correctly. I get the impression DR was never provided with the transcript or asked to approve it as correct. Or else JW would have said that. So, yes, there is every reason to refuse to answer questions based upon an "alleged" transcript of her words.

    I too think Juan knew this was going to happen and was in on it-not that it was wrong or anything-she had every right to do what she did. I also wonder if the abrupt end today was because JSS told them to bring the audio. Hope springs eternal that JSS would take a position against something the defense did.

    I also like how all this is illustrating that nothing the defense does should be trusted. Their witnesses LIE-that's kind of important. The affidavits are useless. Everything they say is suspect.
    http://definitions.uslegal.com/e/errata-sheet/

    An errata sheet is meant to alert the court reporter to possible errors in a deponent’s notes or transcription of his/her notes.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    15,779
    By the way, here is Keifer's comment on what was on the transcript page before Willmott actually read it I think. Different take than I got but how did he know what was in the transcript?

    Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 33s33 seconds ago
    The page says that she didn't know Alexander was having sex with others. "I don't feel comfortable answering the question from a transcript.

    So it appears that her answer of "I don't know" to that weirdly worded question was automatically taken as I don't know if he was having sex with others. Which in itself was a wrong interpretation likely and then it was multiplied by suggesting that meant DR was lying about whether she had sex with him. What a far stretch. Very far.

    Did Kiefer get his info from MDLR before it was presented or were some of the other tweets delayed?

    MOO
    Last edited by Kamille; 01-27-2015 at 10:30 PM.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,742
    Quote Originally Posted by Becky Sharp View Post
    Wow, what a day! So much to comment on: the defense finally rests, Deanna's polite snark to JW. She is so impressive and, like others noted on the previous thread, embodies truth, decency, and integrity, all qualities that the DT's witnesses so obviously lacked. I'm sure the jury can't help comparing the quality of the prosecution's witnesses to those the DT offered.

    My favourite JM sarcasm of today: email by homing pigeon. Gotta love him.

    Anyway, I've got some work to do before bed, so I'll lurk you all tomorrow.
    BBM and they haven't even seen Dr. DeMarte yet!

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    2,051
    Quote Originally Posted by Becky Sharp View Post
    Wow, what a day! So much to comment on: the defense finally rests, Deanna's polite snark to JW. She is so impressive and, like others noted on the previous thread, embodies truth, decency, and integrity, all qualities that the DT's witnesses so obviously lacked. I'm sure the jury can't help comparing the quality of the prosecution's witnesses to those the DT offered.

    My favourite JM sarcasm of today: email by homing pigeon. Gotta love him.

    Anyway, I've got some work to do before bed, so I'll lurk you all tomorrow.
    And the "magic" email.

Page 1 of 33 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 26, Part 2
    By LambChop in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 523
    Last Post: 01-27-2015, 12:04 PM
  2. Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 1/9-1/12 Break - Part 2
    By LambChop in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 238
    Last Post: 01-12-2015, 09:14 AM
  3. Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 11/3/14 Hearing - Part 2
    By LambChop in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 1314
    Last Post: 11-12-2014, 08:12 AM
  4. Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 6 - Part 3
    By LambChop in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 682
    Last Post: 11-03-2014, 08:52 AM
  5. Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 6- Part 2
    By LambChop in forum Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias
    Replies: 983
    Last Post: 11-01-2014, 12:51 PM