I don't think you can accuse people of thinking the Ramseys are guilty because they had money, power and connections. It's an easy accusation to make, but not one which holds much water IMO.
I know that many people resent the fact that they thought they were entitled to a pass because of their money, power and connections - and the fact that they tried to put themselves above the law and expected special conditions - not afforded to the common Joe.
I find THAT offensive. I know plenty of very wealthy but nevertheless modest people. In fact, I was talking about one earlier today - a man who owns a large portion of Scotland and you wouldn't know it. He has a very ordinary manner and his daughter wasn't allowed to go on a school trip because she'd already been on one that term!
In the UK, there is an opinion that "old money" has manners and class and "new money" has not. I think it shows a severe lack of class to be more concerned about WHERE an interview was going to take place and for how long than the fact that the interview might help find the person who terrified, tortured and killed your little daughter!
I think it's unfair to be overly critical of how the Ramseys behaved in the IMMEDIATE aftermath of the murder - but in the days/weeks/months afterwards, I think they are fully accountable for their avoidance tactics and lack of co-operation.
They've had plenty of time to express regret for not getting in there and getting their unique witness testimony on record - yet they continue to point the finger of blame at everyone except themselves.