744 users online (95 members and 649 guests)  


The Killing Season - Websleuths

Websleuths News


Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 519
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Who Dat Nation
    Posts
    29,857

    Netflix to stream new documentary on Steven Avery - #5

    Please continue the discussion here.

    Related Threads:

    Thread #1

    Thread #2

    Thread #3

    Thread #4

    Original Teresa Halbach thread
    Last edited by Coldpizza; 02-07-2016 at 11:37 AM.
    __________________________________
    Muddy water in the street
    ; Muddy water 'round my feet... as sung by the inimitable Bessie Smith, "Muddy Water (A Mississippi Moan)"

    WEBSLEUTHS ON FACEBOOK



  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by MysticJynx View Post
    Where is this Memory Card? And don't the side of that light look smashed in?
    only other time it is mentioned.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SK, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by MysticJynx View Post
    only other time it is mentioned.
    I have done a lot of reading Mystic.... I do not think it was looked at, or if it was, it was nothing worth mentioning. Or who knows.... is there a chance that it was agreed upon earlier to not bring it up? (kinda like blurring the numbers on the phone bills or not putting them up during the trial) Pre-trial motions... deciding what they will agree on, what is inadmissible, etc.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SK, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaiddie View Post
    I agree with this...I have always said I am not completely certain of SA's innocence, as well. My only problem with this concept is if SA did do it, why on earth did they have to go to such lengths to completely disregard ANY type of LEGITIMATE investigation into this matter? No looking into ALL suspects in order to rule ppl out, a lot of forensic evidence that could have been tested and wasn't (such as the 8 fingerprints found on the RAV4 that were never tested for anyone but SA), why wasn't the crime scene processed properly with the correct forensic specialists allowed to document, examine, and recover evidence correctly? I don't know, it just seems like to me if SA HAD done this even partly as they said he did, why did they have to go to so much trouble to make it LOOK like he did it. Shouldn't Some of the evidence been there without them having to mess with EVERYTHING the way it looks like they did?
    I agree Jaiddie. There isn't one piece of evidence that I look at and can say ... oh yep, no way that was tampered with or it wasn't a result of incompetence. Everything from the bones.... to the photographs.... to who unlocked the dang door on the RAV4, and when, and who was there, and who had access... grrrrrrr so frustrating LOL

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by missy1974 View Post
    I have done a lot of reading Mystic.... I do not think it was looked at, or if it was, it was nothing worth mentioning. Or who knows.... is there a chance that it was agreed upon earlier to not bring it up? (kinda like blurring the numbers on the phone bills or not putting them up during the trial) Pre-trial motions... deciding what they will agree on, what is inadmissible, etc.
    Yeah I don't know. Was swabbed for DNA but never tested why? It had her name on it, so I wonder if this was a work Compact Flash Card she would overnight to them after her shoots to get them in the magazine on time? Why would the case be in the front and the disk in the back. such an odd place for a lone disk to be lying don't you think? Could someone have deleted what was on it before pulling it from the camera? could the deleted information be pulled from it? Just one of those odd pieces of evidence.

    If it wasn't worth mentioning, maybe that is why that journal was never mentioned again either.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaiddie View Post
    I agree with this...I have always said I am not completely certain of SA's innocence, as well. My only problem with this concept is if SA did do it, why on earth did they have to go to such lengths to completely disregard ANY type of LEGITIMATE investigation into this matter? No looking into ALL suspects in order to rule ppl out, a lot of forensic evidence that could have been tested and wasn't (such as the 8 fingerprints found on the RAV4 that were never tested for anyone but SA), why wasn't the crime scene processed properly with the correct forensic specialists allowed to document, examine, and recover evidence correctly? I don't know, it just seems like to me if SA HAD done this even partly as they said he did, why did they have to go to so much trouble to make it LOOK like he did it. Shouldn't Some of the evidence been there without them having to mess with EVERYTHING the way it looks like they did?
    Agree completely!! Im not sure of his guilt or innocence but it seems as though the investigation wasnt done properly which makes me question whether they were hiding things or planting them. You guys/gals on here are like super sleuths and I love reading over these forums and getting new info I previously didnt know

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    2,066
    Quote Originally Posted by MysticJynx View Post
    Yeah I don't know. Was swabbed for DNA but never tested why? It had her name on it, so I wonder if this was a work Compact Flash Card she would overnight to them after her shoots to get them in the magazine on time? Why would the case be in the front and the disk in the back. such an odd place for a lone disk to be lying don't you think? Could someone have deleted what was on it before pulling it from the camera? could the deleted information be pulled from it? Just one of those odd pieces of evidence.

    If it wasn't worth mentioning, maybe that is why that journal was never mentioned again either.
    I was thinking she was thrown back there with her purse and the disk and the pen fell out of her purse. What do you think?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Johns Creek
    Posts
    1,611
    If the RAV4 was moved to the pit area on 10/31, why didn't Allan, Chuck, or Earl notice it all week as they were out in the yard and possibly near the crusher ? Or maybe they did ...

    As I understand it, Chuck didn't leave for Crivitz until Thursday after work and Allan normally went up on Thursday as well. Not sure about Earl ...

    It is entirely possible that the call from SA to Chuck on 10/31 around 6pm was to solicit Chuck's help in the coverup and Earl also knew what had transpired. Usually blood is thicker than water ...

    DEFENDANT IS A LIAR + DEFENDANT'S KID GOES MISSING + DEFENDANT REPORTS KID MISSING AFTER 31 DAYS + KID IS FOUND DEAD = DEFENDANT KILLED KID

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    9,483
    My thinking on their not noticing the Rav4:

    Why would they notice that one vehicle among so many others on the property? Were they watching TV to be aware of TH missing? They might have not been thinking TH or her stuff could be on the property, so why look for it. These guys aren't "crime sleuthers" looking for evidence, they're doing their own thing.

    Or, maybe they did notice it and either didn't care -or- didn't connect it to TH's disappearance at the time they might have seen it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,261
    One thing that has troubled me is how harsh the rules of evidence are for defendants. It just seems that the defense should have more leeway than they do in a courtroom. All these rules of evidence they have to follow. To me it just doesn't even fair. If the state has to prove a case the defendant should have great leeway into getting things admitted into evidence and testimony. When a defendant is luck to be able to afford a good lawyer it's tough enough. But when they are stuck with a crappy one or public dependent or one who doesn't even care it's even worse. I'm all for punishing the bad guys but it's scary to think how people can get convicted of something they didn't do without there even being any planting or anything. Hopefully Strang Buting and Zellner can help make more people realize this.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Everything I post without a supporting link is always JMO.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SK, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    This popped up on my fb timeline.

    Making a Murderer: Ontario forensic scientist recalls testimony during Steven Avery trial

    http://globalnews.ca/news/2500310/ma...1094dc01297283

    Fairgrieve, who has testified in court for the Crown in Canada, says the forensic anthropologist in the case made a “leap in logic” in concluding because a majority of Halbach’s remains were found in the fire pit that was the original burn site.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Johns Creek
    Posts
    1,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Madeleine74 View Post
    My thinking on their not noticing the Rav4:

    Why would they notice that one vehicle among so many others on the property? Were they watching TV to be aware of TH missing? They might have not been thinking TH or her stuff could be on the property, so why look for it. These guys aren't "crime sleuthers" looking for evidence, they're doing their own thing.

    Or, maybe they did notice it and either didn't care -or- didn't connect it to TH's disappearance at the time they might have seen it.
    Maybe they didn't, but wasn't the RAV4 the only vehicle in that row partially obscured by branches and a car hood ? Should've stuck out like a sore thumb to those who knew every car in the lot.

    DEFENDANT IS A LIAR + DEFENDANT'S KID GOES MISSING + DEFENDANT REPORTS KID MISSING AFTER 31 DAYS + KID IS FOUND DEAD = DEFENDANT KILLED KID

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    2,066
    Quote Originally Posted by BigCityAccountant View Post
    I was thinking she was thrown back there with her purse and the disk and the pen fell out of her purse. What do you think?
    Ok...still thinking of Mystic's original post....

    Originally Posted by MysticJynx
    Yeah I don't know. Was swabbed for DNA but never tested why? It had her name on it, so I wonder if this was a work Compact Flash Card she would overnight to them after her shoots to get them in the magazine on time? Why would the case be in the front and the disk in the back. such an odd place for a lone disk to be lying don't you think? Could someone have deleted what was on it before pulling it from the camera? could the deleted information be pulled from it? Just one of those odd pieces of evidence.

    If it wasn't worth mentioning, maybe that is why that journal was never mentioned again either.


    I wonder if the pictures of the van are on the compact disk...and I wonder if they are time stamped??? We should know a time she was there by that--wouldn't you think??

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    2,066
    Just thinking this thought....Could TH have hit a ditch or something on her way there which caused the damage? Then, she gets to Avery's with the damage and he notices it and offers to help her find a new one in the lot. I can't remember--did the cadaver dog hit on other cars? Could that possible mean she was walking through that area? I wonder where in relation to the other "Toyota" vehicles on the lot the dog hit, since the cars were lumped together by make/model?

    I'm going to go back to 2005 thread and see if I can find the pictures of those other vehicles....

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    SK, Canada
    Posts
    3,212
    That Flash Card..... it is odd that nothing is mentioned about it, whether it was blank or not. Maybe it had wedding photo's, or vehicles... or nothing. The fact that there is nothing mentioned, is yet again.... odd LOL

    As for noticing or not noticing the vehicle. This was their job, their life. They had a method in that yard... vehicles were in certain places for a reason, whether it was model or make or year, not sure how they did it, but I remember it being mentioned in an interview, maybe with Charles? I'm a mother... have been for almost 24 years.... I notice when things are out of place, or missing or something is added to a spot that it shouldn't be. It's my job LOL I can see how it could go unnoticed for a day or so... but Monday-Saturday?

Page 1 of 35 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2016, 01:15 AM
  2. Netflix to stream new documentary on Steven Avery - #4
    By bessie in forum Netflix Series: Making A Murderer
    Replies: 1257
    Last Post: 02-07-2016, 11:35 AM
  3. Netflix to stream new documentary on Steven Avery - #3
    By bessie in forum Netflix Series: Making A Murderer
    Replies: 1110
    Last Post: 01-25-2016, 09:01 AM
  4. Netflix to stream new documentary on Steven Avery - #2
    By TheDuchess in forum Netflix Series: Making A Murderer
    Replies: 1162
    Last Post: 01-10-2016, 05:44 PM
  5. Netflix to stream new documentary on Steven Avery
    By CarmelEyesD in forum Netflix Series: Making A Murderer
    Replies: 1202
    Last Post: 01-04-2016, 07:32 PM