1167 users online (179 members and 988 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    89

    Arrow CA - Michael Amico Wallace, 30, Menlo Park, 4 Feb 2003

    Mike's page

    of course this may have been checked out but what's your opinion?

    Compare Mike Wallace to the John Doe at the following link

    John Doe, found in Washington

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    682
    Sure is similar. How do things like this get checked out? Someone should take a look at it. Prayers for his family!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,679
    The likeness is similar and the dates sure match. The Washington unidentified has no mention of tattoos, however. I wonder what condition the body was in?
    Here's another link with some more info about Michael http://www.nampn.doenetwork.us/cases...e_michael.html

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    89

    letters from his sister on her site

    One year later

    March 2003 -- Beginning of his disappearance

    The locations could be plausible too. I wish there was more info about the Doe.

    I only said it was probably checked out because it makes all the sense in the world to me that if you find a Doe, you check the surround areas for a "missing".

    It's got to be hard on the families. I would hesitate to send the link to his sister because it could be so hard to take either way.

  5. #5
    SewingDeb's Avatar
    SewingDeb is offline "Sorry, I'm not qualified to land the plane."
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,957
    I would say call LE and let them check it out:

    San Mateo County Sheriffs Department
    650-363-4525

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    26,902
    He's a very good looking man. It does seem as though he took off on his own accord. I just hope he's safe and contacts his family soon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    131
    any updates on the possible match??

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    orange county, ny
    Posts
    2,380
    Quote Originally Posted by annemc2
    The likeness is similar and the dates sure match. The Washington unidentified has no mention of tattoos, however. I wonder what condition the body was in?
    Here's another link with some more info about Michael http://www.nampn.doenetwork.us/cases...e_michael.html
    The John Doe site mentions the remains are skeletal. If no one has done so, I would highly recommend e-mailing the link to the John Doe page to the sister's site. This appears to be a very good possible match.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    593
    here is a picture of a necklace found on the john doe. Someone should email the address on Mike's page and send it to her.

    http://doenetwork.us/cases/73umwa.html

    I personally don't think it's him. I don 't think they look alike. I do recall seeing a John Doe that looks like him, I just have to find him.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    274
    jodierenee ... I too have some hesitation on this one. The doe has such a wide jawline (not sure I described that well) whereas Michael had more of a pointy chin. I realize the doe is a reconstruction, but I'm assuming there is some bodily evidence to make is jawline so wide and "deep."

    My ex-husband was of German descent and he has a similar face structure to the doe (the jawline, I mean).

    Of course, I don't think it hurts to send anything to LE that could be possible.

    Have I have looked at Michael's sites before and am always struck by his good looks and he appears to be genuinely happy in his photos. Sad, sad story as so many are.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    979
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowangel
    The John Doe site mentions the remains are skeletal. If no one has done so, I would highly recommend e-mailing the link to the John Doe page to the sister's site. This appears to be a very good possible match.
    I agree shadowangel .the remains would be skeletal and hard to reconstruct .it is definately a possibilty and anything is worth looking into when someone is missing .I hope someone emailed his sister.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,968
    i agree with jodie & LB,, that the jawline in john doe is very pronounced, and why would they reconstruct the image this way if he did not look like that in real life? can't hurt to send e-mail to LE or his relatives anyway, just in case...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    On the Third Coast
    Posts
    8,667

  14. #14

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    3,108
    Missing for 10 years...What happened to Michael?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. CA CA - Mitchell Owens, 4, Menlo Park, 3 Feb 1983
    By emma l in forum 1980's Missing
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-28-2015, 04:07 PM
  2. CA Mitchell Deon Owens (4) - Menlo Park CA, 1983
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum Missing Children in America - A Profile
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-11-2010, 02:44 PM

Tags for this Thread