1090 users online (226 members and 864 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In heels
    Posts
    27,885

    Extreme Political Correctness

    Wedding painting 'unsuitable for gays'

    A painting of a bride and groom has been removed from a register office in case it offends gay couples tying the knot.

    The wedding scene, and another of Romeo and Juliet, has been ruled unsuitable for single sex civil partnership ceremonies, which start next month.

    Register Officer Janet Taubman said: "We had two pictures up before. There was a picture of a groom signing the register with a young bride and the other was of Romeo and Juliet on a swing.

    "They were innocent but the new paintings are less likely to offend. We are looking forward to the civil partnerships. People have been waiting a long time."

    The old pictures at Liverpool Register Office have been replaced with landscapes while the Wedding Room has been renamed The Ceremony Suite.

    Liverpool City Council said: "The world's moved on. It's not just weddings any more - that's why it's the Ceremony Suite.


    http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1607705.html?menu=

  2. #2
    IrishMist's Avatar
    IrishMist is offline You can't control the wind - but you can adjust your sails
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Southeastern Tennessee
    Posts
    7,469
    The article does go on to say:

    This decision wasn't based on the new civil partnerships. They do all kinds of things - citizenship ceremonies, non-religious naming ceremonies and heterosexual partnership ceremonies.
    "The wedding pictures did not reflect any of these. They have been moved to a more prominent position in the reception area."

    http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_1607705.html?menu=

    So the pictures are still there, just moved.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mountains, CA
    Posts
    1,173
    When I read stuff like this I wonder if it is even true. The article is "thin" on details. I don't read about real complaints in the article. Just that someone moved paintings to a less prominent location.

    Note the place this occurred is Liverpool, England.

    Imagine you are hetero and the place you go to "tie the knot" has paintings of gay couples in wedding apparell gazing longingly into each other's eyes....the shoe were on the other foot, so to speak..

    Is it "extreme political correctness" ???

    (Political correctness btw was a term liberal groups used to indicate intolerance within their own group. It was appropriated by conservatives seeking to attack and focus negative attention on tolerance efforts by liberals.)
    http://www.diversityweb.org/research...c_briefing.cfm

    Perhaps, someone decided to move this painting as a harmless gesture with a motivation to be sensitive or respectful to gay couples honoring their love and committment on a day that is special to them? Maybe this level of kindness is extreme.

    But why did someone write an article on it? To indicate "wow" what kind, sensitive, public servants we have?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Minnesota-land of loons
    Posts
    3,212
    Well, what's next? The other night on Boston Legal the firm represented a guy in an annulment case. His wife was seeking one when she learned he had been sexually unfaithful to her several times during the marriage with...ahem...his cows. The bovine, not human, variety. I mean, hey, why not?

    Eve

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,530
    Ummm, unless the article was misquoted above, the paintings were moved to a MORE prominient location, not less. It sounds like someone making a fuss over nothing - a little rearranging to account for the functions of each of the rooms - a bunch of wedding stuff in a room for citizenship swearing in and such does sound out of place.

    It's not extreme political correctness, it's extreme attempts to scare conservatives, done by the media (they love scary stories, those get linked and re-reported).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In heels
    Posts
    27,885
    It would have been easier to ad a photo of a same sex couple.

    Anyone who is offended by the image of a couple getting married is WAY too easily offended

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    26,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Casshew
    It would have been easier to ad a photo of a same sex couple.

    Anyone who is offended by the image of a couple getting married is WAY too easily offended

    Ditto.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Casshew
    It would have been easier to ad a photo of a same sex couple.

    Anyone who is offended by the image of a couple getting married is WAY too easily offended
    I don't know which is worse---overreaction by the thin-skinned or the gutless caving in of those yelled at by the thin-skinned.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In heels
    Posts
    27,885
    Too close to call Billy

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by BillyGoatGruff
    I don't know which is worse---overreaction by the thin-skinned or the gutless caving in of those yelled at by the thin-skinned.
    Except in this case I can't find anything to suggest anyone, thin-skinned or otherwise, reacted to the pictures, much less overreacted. Or that there was any caving-in done. Were there complaints that prompted the action?


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,530
    Quote Originally Posted by BillyGoatGruff
    I don't know which is worse---overreaction by the thin-skinned or the gutless caving in of those yelled at by the thin-skinned.
    How about false stories that suggest gutless caving in and overreactions when none exist? Or leaping on a false interpretation to further an agenda?

    Two paintings were moved to a MORE - not less - MORE prominent location because a room that was for marriages was becoming more of a general room where many types of ceremonies took place.

    You should read the article - the writer did what he could to suggest a problem, but it was a simple redecoration, as the use of the office had evolved.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Details
    How about false stories that suggest gutless caving in and overreactions when none exist? Or leaping on a false interpretation to further an agenda?

    Two paintings were moved to a MORE - not less - MORE prominent location because a room that was for marriages was becoming more of a general room where many types of ceremonies took place.

    You should read the article - the writer did what he could to suggest a problem, but it was a simple redecoration, as the use of the office had evolved.
    This assumes I give more than a passing rat's ass, but snce I could care less either way, why bother?
    That's the problem with today's society--somebody, somewere is always trying to raise a stink, for some reason or another. The older get, the more I appreciate the mentality of the mountain men who moved into the wilderness to get the hell away from people with too much time on their hands and nothing to keep them occupied. God knows this is the Internet's second largest function, its primary function being that of delivering porn.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,530
    Maybe you should give a rats ass as to whether or not something is real before you get outraged over it.

    There was no overly sensitive PC action here - just some writer reading too much into a little redecoration.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mountains, CA
    Posts
    1,173
    Quote Originally Posted by eve
    Well, what's next? The other night on Boston Legal the firm represented a guy in an annulment case. His wife was seeking one when she learned he had been sexually unfaithful to her several times during the marriage with...ahem...his cows. The bovine, not human, variety. I mean, hey, why not?

    Eve
    Wedding photos of guys and cow? is that what you mean?



Similar Threads

  1. Political Correctness Run Amok?
    By Dark Knight in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-23-2006, 01:42 PM