Possible Match, NamUs case UP 10561

Cubby

fly the W!
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
77,225
Reaction score
13,493
Let me preface this by saying this is a long shot due to distance. The age range for partial remains found in Clark County in a cave in 1995 are determined not to be ancient remains and the age range is 3 to 7.

According to Doe Network possible matches need to be done manually.

Nam US link
https://identifyus.org/cases/10561

Doe Network link
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1001ufnv.html


I will send emails to the appropriate agencies including NCMEC in the morning.
 
Let me preface this by saying this is a long shot due to distance. The age range for partial remains found in Clark County in a cave in 1995 are determined not to be ancient remains and the age range is 3 to 7.

According to Doe Network possible matches need to be done manually.

Nam US link
https://identifyus.org/cases/10561

Doe Network link
http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/1001ufnv.html


I will send emails to the appropriate agencies including NCMEC in the morning.

Hoping this is not Anna and that they do id these remains to give this person closure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Cubby, who is the missing person you are submitting?
 
Anna Waters. It's a long shot, but I'm neurotic about having official rule outs.

BBM

I'd replace that term with thorough or dependable or persistent or boss....

:seeya:
 
I submitted Brandi Krajewski to see if she were ever compared to these remains.
Charley updated her page with new information, stating that her mother's bf took off with Brandi while she was at work.
They found him about 4 months later in NV, but Brandi wasn't with him, so there's a good chance that's where she ended up.
Coincidentally, his last name was Waters. . .
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/k/krajewski_brandi.html
 
BBM

I'd replace that term with thorough or dependable or persistent or boss....

:seeya:

Yes,Cubby is all of those things. However, I need to ask why a child's remains discovered 22 years ago in Nevada are just now being considered (despite the national dna database, etc.) as possibly belonging to Anna. And the Brandi in a later post...I don't see how either of these could have a bearing on Anna's case. That said, I am grateful for the interest and for the effort.
 
Yes,Cubby is all of those things. However, I need to ask why a child's remains discovered 22 years ago in Nevada are just now being considered (despite the national dna database, etc.) as possibly belonging to Anna. And the Brandi in a later post...I don't see how either of these could have a bearing on Anna's case. That said, I am grateful for the interest and for the effort.

Not sure why, but for some reason, investigators are insisting on manual comparisons on a case by case basis for this set of remains instead of automatic ones, like the do through CODIS.
I submitted Brandi as a possible match because I recently found out that her last known whereabouts was Nevada. Brandi's case has no bearing on Anna's, I was just pointing out a coincidence in the name of her abductor. I apologize for any confusion.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
116
Guests online
944
Total visitors
1,060

Forum statistics

Threads
589,930
Messages
17,927,806
Members
228,004
Latest member
CarpSleuth
Back
Top