CA CA - Los Angeles, WhtFem UP4042, 20-30, Yellow Metal Broach in Hand, Jun'88

New Posts

Romulus

Romulus

Ivan
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
3,340
Reaction score
4,606
Namus UP 4042

https://www.identifyus.org/en/cases/4042

Unidentified Body/Remains (White Female)
Found June 10, 1988 in Los Angeles County, CA
Body Condition: Recognizable face
Probable year of death: 1988 to 1988

Vital Statistics
Estimated age: 20-30
Approximate Height: 62 estimate
Approximate Weight: 104 estimate
Hair Color: Brown
Eye Color: Brown
Scars and marks: nothing

Clothing & Accessories
Clothing: BRO BUTTON UP BLOUSE, BLU PANTS, PINK PANTIES, WHI BRA, WHI ANKL SOCKS
Jewerly: Ring, Necklace, Watch
YM BROACH IN R HAND,WM MENS WATCH-DIGITAL,WM RINGSTONE MSIG,WM RING LRG CLR
Footwear: WHI ANKLE HIGH SHOES-BOOT STYLE
Accessories: Nothing

Identifiers
Fingerprints: Fingerprint information is available and entered
Dentals: Dental information / charting is available and entered
DNA: Sample submitted-tests complete

Case History: On 06/10/1988 the decedent was found on the sidewalk with trauma to her head.
 
Here's my reconstruction for this Jane Doe.

d27916c4-9058-4125-8897-3f6217575e95.jpg


I did this quite some time ago, but there was no thread for her until now. Thanks Romulus
 
Wondergirl said:
Carl, did you do this reconstruct from pictures or ???

I can't seem to find any on her at Namus.

Thanks,
WG
Click to expand...

Yes, I have a very poor quality PM photo of her that I got back in the days when LA County posted PM photos on the coroner's website.

Her entire forehead, most of her eyebrows, and her right cheek are photoshopped over to cover up graphic detail, but her other features (hair, nose, lips, chin, and overall facial shape) were adequate enough to come up with what I think is a pretty good representation of her look.
 
Bumping case up. @CarlK90245 your reconstruction for this woman is no longer visible on the thread :(. Do you happen to still have it?

I'm thinking this case is still solvable. They have so many identifiers. Going to think positive on this one...
 
ChatteringBirds said:
Bumping case up. @CarlK90245 your reconstruction for this woman is no longer visible on the thread :(. Do you happen to still have it?

I'm thinking this case is still solvable. They have so many identifiers. Going to think positive on this one...
Click to expand...


Here it is.
 

Attachments

  • LA County - 478UFCA Reconstruction 004.jpg
    LA County - 478UFCA Reconstruction 004.jpg
    75.1 KB · Views: 41
Bumping her up. Never heard of her! New case for me to start investigating. @CarlK90245 as for your low quality PM photo you speak of, was she in good enough condition that reconstruction was easy enough? Just asking because that reconstruction is amazing as always. :)
 
EmiliaRT007 said:
Bumping her up. Never heard of her! New case for me to start investigating. @CarlK90245 as for your low quality PM photo you speak of, was she in good enough condition that reconstruction was easy enough? Just asking because that reconstruction is amazing as always. :)
Click to expand...
The PM was very blurry and half of her head was covered over with Photoshop smudge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 172 more.
Total: 1,541 (members: 173, guests: 1,368)

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
1,368
Total visitors
1,541
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,801
Messages
17,959,078
Members
228,607
Latest member
wdavewong
Back
Top