OR OR - Eugene, UnkSex/Race 3-12, UP15477, child's mandible from trailer park, Oct'05

Romulus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
3,348
Reaction score
4,640
NamUs UP 15477

https://www.identifyus.org/en/cases/15477

Unidentified Body/Remains (Unknown Sex & Race)
Found October 18, 2005 in Lane County, OR
Body Condition: Not recognizable - partial skeletal parts only
Probable year of death: to


Vital Statistics
Estimated age: 3-12
Approximate Height: cannot estimate
Approximate Weight: cannot estimate
Hair Color: Unknown
Eye Color: Unknown
Scars and marks: nothing

Clothing & Accessories
Clothing: nothing
Jewerly: nothing
Footwear: nothing
Accessories: nothing

Identifiers
Fingerprints: Fingerprint information is not available
Dentals: Dental information / charting is not available
DNA: Complete - Insufficient DNA for profiling

Case History: A portion of a child's mandible was recovered from a trailer park
 
I could not see any recent updates or media. Can anyone see if there are rule outs for this little one?
 
We will take a look @ChatteringBirds. Congrats BTW, on your avatar being identified :)

Thank you for being open to the many requests you must receive here.
Now I'm searching for the next case to use as an avatar; I hope to change it this week. Looking for one that needs attention -- Every case matters...
 
Thank you for being open to the many requests you must receive here.
Now I'm searching for the next case to use as an avatar; I hope to change it this week. Looking for one that needs attention -- Every case matters...

Let us know what you pick! We especially like NCMEC.
 

Bumping case up. Any rule-outs? I'm guessing sadly there can't be?
No updates to the Namus case for over 1 year and nil ruleouts.

I wonder why they haven't sought NCMEC assistance for a reconstruction - maybe they literally don't have enough remains to form the basis of a good illustration?
 
No updates to the Namus case for over 1 year and nil ruleouts.

I wonder why they haven't sought NCMEC assistance for a reconstruction - maybe they literally don't have enough remains to form the basis of a good illustration?

They only have a partial mandible, so not enough to make a reconstruction.
I wonder when they tried to sequence the DNA. Given how much DNA technology has advanced, I hope they try again.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
220
Guests online
4,834
Total visitors
5,054

Forum statistics

Threads
592,332
Messages
17,967,563
Members
228,748
Latest member
renenoelle
Back
Top