866 users online (143 members and 723 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796

    This is not a current news story.

    But it was just so unusual I had to post it. It underlines the importance of not jumping to conclusions until all of the evidence is in.

    Strange scuicide
    At the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Science, AAFS President Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story.

    "On 23 March 1994, the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound of the head. The decedent had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide (he left a note indicating his despondency). As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the decedent was aware that a safety net had been erected at the eighth floor level to protect some window washers and that Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide anyway because of this."

    "Ordinarily," Dr. Mills continued, "a person who sets out to commit suicide ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended."

    That Opus was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below probably would not have changed his mode of death from suicide to homicide. But the fact that his suicidal intent would not have been successful caused the medical examiner to feel that he had homicide on his hands.
    http://www.squizzle.com/newsview.asp?id=1462
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,715

    wow

    This one might even qualify for the bizarre section.

  3. #3
    SewingDeb's Avatar
    SewingDeb is offline "Sorry, I'm not qualified to land the plane."
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    8,957
    Wow! This is interesting...and with a surprise ending. I wasn't expecting the last part.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by mysteriew
    But it was just so unusual I had to post it. It underlines the importance of not jumping to conclusions until all of the evidence is in.

    Strange scuicide
    At the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Science, AAFS President Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego with the legal complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story.

    "On 23 March 1994, the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound of the head. The decedent had jumped from the top of a ten-story building intending to commit suicide (he left a note indicating his despondency). As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast through a window, which killed him instantly. Neither the shooter nor the decedent was aware that a safety net had been erected at the eighth floor level to protect some window washers and that Opus would not have been able to complete his suicide anyway because of this."

    "Ordinarily," Dr. Mills continued, "a person who sets out to commit suicide ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he intended."

    That Opus was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below probably would not have changed his mode of death from suicide to homicide. But the fact that his suicidal intent would not have been successful caused the medical examiner to feel that he had homicide on his hands.
    http://www.squizzle.com/newsview.asp?id=1462
    I totally agree about not jumping to conclusions. That's easy to forget on the internet, sometimes.

    However, the story told above is an Urban Legend.

    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/freakish/opus.htm

    From the link:

    A story this good should be true. Alas, it's not. There never was a suicidal Ronald Opus, a feuding, shotgun-wielding older couple, or an increasingly confused medical examiner trying to get to the bottom of things. But there is some truth to it, for there is a Don Harper Mills, and he did tell this very story at a meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences.

    Here's how Mills explained his involvement with the story in a 1997 interview:



    I made up the story in 1987 to present at the meeting, for entertainment and to illustrate how if you alter a few small facts you greatly alter the legal consequences. In 1994 someone copied it on to the Internet. I was told it had already garnered 200,000 enquiries on the Net. In the past two years I've had around 400 telephone calls about it - librarians, journalists, law students, even law professors wanting to incorporate it into text books.
    It was hypothetical; just a story made up to illustrate a point. It's hard to imagine anyone at that 1987 meeting took it for anything else.

    How did a 1987 illustrative anecdote morph into 1994's believed-to-be-true story? We'll likely never know. How did Dr. Mills come to concoct such a tale? As he said in a 1997 interview, "Some of it I wrote out, and some of it I invented as I went along."

    Ronald Opus never lived. And his death will never die.

    In 1998 we began seeing versions attributed "A true story from Associated Press, by Kurt Westervelt." If that venerable wire service employs a writer by that name, we've yet to see anything under his byline. As for AP itself having run the Opus story, no, it never did.


    Dr. Mills made it up to illustrate exactly the sort of thing mysteriew was trying to demonstrate -- therefore, even though the story is an internet-bound urban legend of long standing, it still is a pretty good way of making that statement about getting all the facts in. I personally believed this story for years until I saw the "Homicide" episode based on it, and that was when my b.s. meter went off, and I checked Snopes -- there it was.

    Steve/Mr. A

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    Thanks for the background on the story Steve. It seemed a little too fantastic to be true. But it is still one I will try to keep in mind.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight



Similar Threads

  1. saw this news story....
    By PFF in forum Bizarre and Off-Beat News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-19-2015, 07:43 AM
  2. Another Coffee News Story to Offest the Other One!
    By MrsG728 in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-15-2009, 02:01 PM
  3. What was the top news story of 2007?
    By STO4 in forum Up to the Minute
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 12:06 PM