1171 users online (250 members and 921 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750

    Is it a crime to create a fake unidentified person site?

    Edited to add:
    Note to new readers: New Info! This is a case of coming across a site that has not been updated (info about this is posted further down). It appears to be a real site, not a fake one.



    I'm asking this question as I've come upon a site, that talks about real crime cases. There are a few on this web page, all of the other cases discussed are well known, recognised cases.

    Case #1 lists an unidentified woman, found in July 2005, in Tyler, Texas. It includes a sketch of the woman, similiar to the sketches you find on the Doe Network. Problem is I've checked the Texas Clearing House's unidentified listings and she isn't there - also I did some other searches and could find nothing on this woman.

    The web page author asks anyone with information to contact him. There is no reference as to where the information is sourced from.

    There is no mention of a date of death. She is called an "unidentified" female. So this leads me to think the following:

    1. She has been indentified since July 2005 and all traces of her have been removed from the internet.

    2. She is a creation of the web page author's imagination. (note: he lists her height as 6'4" - she would be a VERY tall woman)

    3. This is a person the web page author met and would like to romantically pursue.

    4. The web page author is stalking this person and is looking for leads as to where she might be.

    5. The web page author confused some of the information and this is a real case.

    6. None of the above, there is another explanation.


    The website is: http://www.true-ghost-stories.com/Help.html

    A final *curious* thing... you can't copy the photos, they've all been copyright protected....
    Last edited by PonderingThings; 01-02-2006 at 04:57 PM.

  2. #2
    Some people create sites and use anything they can to generate revenue. Maybe this is the case here. It does have a generate revenue sign from Google Adsense.

    By the way... case #6 made me think of the 2 kids remains found in California.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750
    I guess what I have a problem with is "date found". It implies that she is in someone's custody - not a seeking information about kind of thing.

    As you know YaYa I disagree about the California case... but that's ok, I respect your input.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,804
    I bet that's a typo. and meant to say 64". Which is 5'4", a very average height.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750
    KatherineQ that makes perfect sense!

    It will make me if this was set up just to generate revenue! On the one hand I hate the idea that every time someone goes to the link I provided this person makes money. On the other hand I still don't know if this is for real, or a scam. Also, I don't know if its illegal if it is a scam!!!

    ...IF it is a scam to make money its IMMORAL in my world!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by PonderingThings
    I guess what I have a problem with is "date found". It implies that she is in someone's custody - not a seeking information about kind of thing.

    As you know YaYa I disagree about the California case... but that's ok, I respect your input.
    I didn't say I think these are the same kids... just that it made me think of the unidentified kids.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Georgetown, TX
    Posts
    262
    I don't see where the site is asking for donations. Anyone can put anything on the web if it doesn't break certain laws. (even fake information) For instance, if they are asking for donations using false pretenses and the donations traveled through the U.S. postal service that would be a crime.

    The thing I do have a problem is that no law enforcement agency is listed for the cases. That information should ALWAYS appear. The web site can take leads and pass them on but the perferred method is to have the tips go directly to the responsible LE.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750
    The site isn't asking for donations. I believe Yaya was referring to the google ad banner at the top of the page - apparently this generates revenues.

  9. #9
    aheddle's Avatar
    aheddle is offline I love the sound of Troll knuckles scraping the ground as they venture by...
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    288
    Maybe there is reward money offered for the resolution of these cases and it is the site owner's way to try to qualify for any rewards via info sent to him/her.

    I am probably wrong but it was just a thought.

    Hopefully it is just someone with a calling to help in any way they can....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750
    It would appear that I owe the web site owner an apology!

    The problem is that she was identified in August 2005. The web site owner has not updated their information but all other information was removed from google searches.

    Also, it would appear that google does not reference the identified/found page on the Doe Network. When I used the Doe Network's search engine it came up right away:

    http://www.doenetwork.us/cases/found.html


    Teresa L. Bryan
    The victim was located on June 12, 2005 in Tyler, Texas. She was identified in August 2005 as Teresa L. Bryan from Waskom, Texas.


    So... web site owner, if you ever read this I'm very sorry for casting doubt on your motives. I believe you should be listing the LE contacts though instead of having tips go to you, however, that is a different issue.

    I'm still interested in knowing if something *like* what I thought was going on is possible to get away with?


    Edited to add: Google does reference that page, unfortunately I was searching for "unidentified" at the time, not "identified". My error


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,715

    yep

    Quote Originally Posted by PonderingThings
    . . .I'm still interested in knowing if something *like* what I thought was going on is possible to get away with?. . .
    Long ago I heard rumors that some missing children agencies and some websites were allegedly being set up by pedophiles but I have never really checked into that as I think that in many cases it would need the powers of L.E. to check up on that.

    You do raise a valid point about giving info to L.E. rather than to a website when we do not know the true reasons that websites owner may be looking for someone, especially on family websites. If I was a bad guy & my wife went missing because I was abusive or just because she wanted to start a new life I could start a website up claiming she was lost and probably kidnapped & without her meds etc and beg the public for help. Once I got the info I could do whatever I wanted.

    And yes a bad guy also could start up a fake website to help find missing kids and then use that info to find victems.

    That is why I prefer to turn any real finds over to L.E. rather than to some website owner.

    Side note:I often do a search on missing names and the word "found" just to weed out cases where the person has already been located and I also often run a search on the name and the word "hoax" to weed out hoaxes. I should really do this in all cases but sometimes I get lazy.

    Another thing I should always do but don't always do is to search missing person names and "journal" of everyone involved in a missing person case. Sometimes I remember to run a search of "I killed" and the victems name just in case someone felt the need to confess but at the same time would feel safe because of hiding behind a user name online.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by PonderingThings
    It would appear that I owe the web site owner an apology! My error
    OK Pondering... slowly step away from the computer...

    We all screw up sometimes.

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by docwho3
    Side note:I often do a search on missing names and the word "found" just to weed out cases where the person has already been located and I also often run a search on the name and the word "hoax" to weed out hoaxes. I should really do this in all cases but sometimes I get lazy.

    Another thing I should always do but don't always do is to search missing person names and "journal" of everyone involved in a missing person case. Sometimes I remember to run a search of "I killed" and the victems name just in case someone felt the need to confess but at the same time would feel safe because of hiding behind a user name online.
    Doc

    I'm sorry, I couldn't resist I just think you are a sweety.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,750
    Yaya tomorrow I will return to reality and give my bleary eyes a rest! I don't think it can come soon enough!

    Doc interesting strategies. Personally I don't know how you would have found an unidentified person's identified info by putting found in the search (they are already found!) but then perhaps it would work. Instead if I was going to go that far, and it would be only in special instances, I would use unidentified+tyler+texas+identified ... but I only just learned this strategy because of this instance - don't know if the scenerio will EVER occur again!

    Have you ever found a reference to "I killed insert name" that wasn't a joke?

    Your reminder about getting lazy is well taken. In the case on this thread I did check MULTIPLE sites with no results. Then, and only then, did I post the question. At no time did I say this is what they were doing, instead I listed 6 possible reasons why it could be something else, and asked others what they thought. Turns out it was the first one I listed.

    I believe I acted responsibly, even if I eventually did find ONE reference to the identification. Do you disagree?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    1,804
    Pondering - I'm so glad you posted the update about Teresa. My family is from Tyler, and they still read the newspaper online, and we go through there all the time.

    I'm baffled by why there isn't any information about Teresa, and also baffled by how you actually did manage to find her online - because I can't. I can't find anything about "found woman Tyler Texas" or body found Tyler texas with the date, and on and on and the Telegraph doesn't have archives that far back.

    She must be a suicide maybe? Why else would she not merit even one newspaper article that is still online - it was 6 months ago that her body was ID'd.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Family Says Fake Web Site Created About Haleigh To Make Money
    By MADJGNLAW in forum Haleigh Cummings
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 02-23-2009, 04:02 PM
  2. Department of Justice Missing Person's site.
    By ketel0ne in forum National and International Databases and Resources
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-07-2008, 07:49 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-29-2007, 02:07 PM
  4. The Wiki @ MissingAbducted.com You create the site
    By ketel0ne in forum Missing Archives
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-02-2005, 03:26 PM