1114 users online (250 members and 864 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,906

    Jennifer's Boobs are News

    http://www.courttv.com/people/2006/0113/aniston_ctv.html


    A photographer who took topless photos of actress Jennifer Aniston claims he did so lawfully because she had no reasonable expectation of privacy when she stepped outside to sunbathe nude on her balcony.


    The star, best known for her role on the hit TV series "Friends," sued photographer Peter Brandt for invasion of privacy in December after learning that the photojournalist was offering topless photos of her with actor Vince Vaughn to various media outlets.

    Her lawyers launched a vigorous campaign to contain the images and sent letters to the media threatening to sue anyone who used them. But documents filed in Los Angeles Superior Court claim that the partially nude actress was clearly visible to anyone on the street from where she sat with Vaughn, "smoking an unknown substance which appear[ed] to be marijuana," on the balcony of her home in the Hollywood Hills.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Other End
    Posts
    25,761
    I lay out topless and I don't have a problem with the paparazzi taking my picture.. I wonder if they have my correct address ... hehe

    I like Jennifer and I wish her the best


    This post is my opinion only, and is subject to making me look totally confused

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,587
    Quote Originally Posted by PaperDoll
    I lay out topless and I don't have a problem with the paparazzi taking my picture.. I wonder if they have my correct address ... hehe

    I like Jennifer and I wish her the best
    LOL, PaperDoll! When I lived in Colorado, I used to lay on a float in my pool topless. We lived on 5 acres so I felt it was pretty private. Then one day, a helocopter was flying above and he turned around, coming in lower and lower. He was hovering so close it was causing waves in the pool! From that time on, whenever I heard small aircraft in the distance, I always put my top back on!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,103

    I don't get it

    What I don't get about this lawsuit is, how come it is alright for Jennifer to appear semi-topless on a magazine cover, but when someone shoots a picture of her topless in her backyard, it is a crime??

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    at home
    Posts
    23,626
    Quote Originally Posted by Maral
    LOL, PaperDoll! When I lived in Colorado, I used to lay on a float in my pool topless. We lived on 5 acres so I felt it was pretty private. Then one day, a helocopter was flying above and he turned around, coming in lower and lower. He was hovering so close it was causing waves in the pool! From that time on, whenever I heard small aircraft in the distance, I always put my top back on!
    About 15 years ago, I used to spend a lot of time at a company in San Diego, who was developing a data compression system for a camera we were going to fly on our missions. One of the guys who worked there was into model airplanes, and he had one with a camera, and a transmitter on it, that he used to fly over the backyards near where he lived, for that very purpose, so if you hear even a model airplane in the area, take heed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by BrendaStar
    What I don't get about this lawsuit is, how come it is alright for Jennifer to appear semi-topless on a magazine cover, but when someone shoots a picture of her topless in her backyard, it is a crime??

    There's a big difference between those 2 scenarios IMO.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    17,715
    If he's selling pictures of her like that, seems like he should have permission.

    Since she was at home, seems like invasion of privacy to me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by SimonSays
    There's a big difference between those 2 scenarios IMO.
    Exactly! However, JA has been photographed SEVERAL times topless. Girl...get a clue....keep your clothes on!!!!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    2,314
    Quote Originally Posted by BrendaStar
    What I don't get about this lawsuit is, how come it is alright for Jennifer to appear semi-topless on a magazine cover, but when someone shoots a picture of her topless in her backyard, it is a crime??
    IMO, one she is getting paid for, and one she is not.
    But, I also have to agree it is sorta an invasion of privacy

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    30,906
    Quote Originally Posted by Carrington
    IMO, one she is getting paid for, and one she is not.
    But, I also have to agree it is sorta an invasion of privacy
    If you walk out to your balcony or out your front door naked don't whine if someone snaps a pic!


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    New York ... for now.
    Posts
    5,413
    Quote Originally Posted by PaperDoll
    I lay out topless and I don't have a problem with the paparazzi taking my picture.. I wonder if they have my correct address ... hehe

    I like Jennifer and I wish her the best

    ... I'll hand over the topless photo's I took of you if you wish!!!! That was me in that tree!!! I'll be back when you get those NEW ta ta's!!! LOL Just teasin' ya PD!!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    14,163
    Quote Originally Posted by BrendaStar
    What I don't get about this lawsuit is, how come it is alright for Jennifer to appear semi-topless on a magazine cover, but when someone shoots a picture of her topless in her backyard, it is a crime??
    Because one she agreed too, and it was tasefully done, and the other was without her permission.
    Rest in Peace to my best buddy and baby, Buster ~ He crossed the Rainbow Bridge on Jan. 3, 2011. I miss you, Buster and love you with all my being.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Other End
    Posts
    25,761
    Quote Originally Posted by Stan
    ... I'll hand over the topless photo's I took of you if you wish!!!! That was me in that tree!!! I'll be back when you get those NEW ta ta's!!! LOL Just teasin' ya PD!!
    I roll over for ya Stan so you can get the full view... hehe... I was on my stomach when you snapped that pic... hehe


    This post is my opinion only, and is subject to making me look totally confused

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Other End
    Posts
    25,761
    Quote Originally Posted by PrayersForMaura
    Because one she agreed too, and it was tasefully done, and the other was without her permission.
    I agree ... Everyone has a right to their privacy no matter who you are... She is not public property for just anyone to do as they please...


    This post is my opinion only, and is subject to making me look totally confused

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,748
    I'm more inteested in the "smoking an unknown substance which appear[ed] to be marijuana" part of the story -- doesn't she know that's illegal?

    and is it legal to 'flash' boobs in public in California?


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Interview with Aaron Young Jennifer Moxley News 14 2011.01.19
    By Mrs G Norris in forum Zahra Clare Baker
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 06:10 PM
  2. If Only Kate Had Bigger Boobs!!!???
    By kidzndogznme in forum Madeleine McCann
    Replies: 145
    Last Post: 10-20-2007, 08:51 PM