741 users online (127 members and 614 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 77
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    small town, VA
    Posts
    1,814

    Looky what beesy found!!

    I know this has been discussed before, but I thought I'd refresh memories
    In Darin's first hand-written statement, taken on the day of the funeral, he says he came downstairs nude(ew). Then after the cops arrived he ran back upstairs to put his pants on. He even says "I noticed my wallet hitting the floor". So he puts himself coming downstairs 2x. The first time sounds real to me. He wrote that while upstairs getting his pants, all he could think of was getting Karen to help. I don't understand what he's saying right here: "I needed someone to help some and held(sic) the paramedics when they arrived." Does he mean help? Why would the paramedics need help? Why isn't he getting her to help until the medics arrive? It sounds like this is the first time he's thought of getting Karen, even though he was caught outside by Waddell. In one of the stories he says he was on his way to get her and that's why he was outside. He doesn't say anything about being outside in this statement.
    He wrote that after checking on Devon and seeing the holes in his chest, he ran to check Damon, who was laying on the floor in the hallway between the wall and the side of the couch, near the bathroom. Very descriptive, huh? Is that for a reason? He wrote "he had no pulse, but I could not see any injury(sic)"
    This is transcribed in Springer's Flesh and Blood. Since it is transcribed word for word and not just mentioned, I feel like we can trust it. pages 95-96
    Beesy Was Here

    So I held my head up high
    Hiding hate that burns inside
    Which only fuels their selfish pride
    We're all held captive
    Out from the sun
    A sun that shines on only some
    We the meek are all in one
    Creed
    My Own Prison


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Beesy, I think the reason he was outside...was to finish making the plant of the sock or throwing the sock and other things into the street drain, which ever theory you believe. Everyone knows that Darin was mad at the police for not telling him until much later about the sock. I think the reason he was mad is because he was going to use that sock to say ...see...there was someone in here and they took a sock when they left. Others think he was mad because it made them look guilty and they should have told them of the sock right away. Darin HAD to think of some reason he was outside...so I think he used the neighbor friend story as a cover. If it had been me...and my kids were dying...I would not have wasted time being outside when I knew the police and ambulance were already on the way. Darin did lots of strange things that night. He also did one SMART thing too. He didn't wear a shirt. The second smart thing he did was INSIST that the lawyer they hired did NOT point the finger his direction. He looks and plays a fool well. Maybe he is smarter than we give the fool credit for. He also has managed to keep a low profile all these years. Anyone else find it funny that he didn't show up for this last hearing? Even if the court didn't let me into the hearing...I still would have shown up...especially if it was about my innocent wife on death row!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    362
    Quote Originally Posted by deandaniellws
    Beesy, I think the reason he was outside...was to finish making the plant of the sock or throwing the sock and other things into the street drain, which ever theory you believe. Everyone knows that Darin was mad at the police for not telling him until much later about the sock. I think the reason he was mad is because he was going to use that sock to say ...see...there was someone in here and they took a sock when they left. Others think he was mad because it made them look guilty and they should have told them of the sock right away. Darin HAD to think of some reason he was outside...so I think he used the neighbor friend story as a cover. If it had been me...and my kids were dying...I would not have wasted time being outside when I knew the police and ambulance were already on the way. Darin did lots of strange things that night. He also did one SMART thing too. He didn't wear a shirt. The second smart thing he did was INSIST that the lawyer they hired did NOT point the finger his direction. He looks and plays a fool well. Maybe he is smarter than we give the fool credit for. He also has managed to keep a low profile all these years. Anyone else find it funny that he didn't show up for this last hearing? Even if the court didn't let me into the hearing...I still would have shown up...especially if it was about my innocent wife on death row!
    OK, not following. Why was it smart that he didn't wear a shirt.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by justice2
    OK, not following. Why was it smart that he didn't wear a shirt.
    Because any cast off blood that showed he might have participated in or was near when the killings happened could not be tested or proved. They only had the jeans...and for some reason, even those were not tested. I still think he was totally involved in this. However, I guess the police don't think he was involved...or if they do, they know they don't have the evidence to back it up.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    small town, VA
    Posts
    1,814
    Quote Originally Posted by deandaniellws
    Because any cast off blood that showed he might have participated in or was near when the killings happened could not be tested or proved. They only had the jeans...and for some reason, even those were not tested. I still think he was totally involved in this. However, I guess the police don't think he was involved...or if they do, they know they don't have the evidence to back it up.
    The jeans didn't have any spatter on them. They were just bloody. And he covered his butt by saying he was near all 3 victims, and the blood pattern/lack of on his jeans backed him up. So Dufus lucked up!
    Beesy Was Here

    So I held my head up high
    Hiding hate that burns inside
    Which only fuels their selfish pride
    We're all held captive
    Out from the sun
    A sun that shines on only some
    We the meek are all in one
    Creed
    My Own Prison


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by beesy
    The jeans didn't have any spatter on them. They were just bloody. And he covered his butt by saying he was near all 3 victims, and the blood pattern/lack of on his jeans backed him up. So Dufus made it!
    Yeah...he is a lucky FREAKING dufus!!!!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    small town, VA
    Posts
    1,814
    Getting a little hostile Pam? LOL My big problem with his statement is he says Damon had no pulse, but he saw no injury. What? That makes no sense!
    Beesy Was Here

    So I held my head up high
    Hiding hate that burns inside
    Which only fuels their selfish pride
    We're all held captive
    Out from the sun
    A sun that shines on only some
    We the meek are all in one
    Creed
    My Own Prison


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    small town, VA
    Posts
    1,814
    [QUOTE=deandaniellws]
    Beesy, I think the reason he was outside...was to finish making the plant of the sock or throwing the sock and other things into the street drain, which ever theory you believe. Everyone knows that Darin was mad at the police for not telling him until much later about the sock. I think the reason he was mad is because he was going to use that sock to say ...see...there was someone in here and they took a sock when they left. Others think he was mad because it made them look guilty and they should have told them of the sock right away.
    Thats why I think he was dumping the sock. Huge risk to set up lie, HUGE. I think he was upset when he found out about the sock for two reasons, 1. he thought he'd made it and the sock was gone or 2. He knew he missed but hadn't told the Queen of the castle yet. When did he find that out in relation to those bruises on her arm?
    Beesy Was Here

    So I held my head up high
    Hiding hate that burns inside
    Which only fuels their selfish pride
    We're all held captive
    Out from the sun
    A sun that shines on only some
    We the meek are all in one
    Creed
    My Own Prison


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by beesy
    Getting a little hostile Pam? LOL My big problem with his statement is he says Damon had no pulse, but he saw no injury. What? That makes no sense!
    Yeah..I caught that too. Just a little....does it show!?!?!?! They could not afford for either child to live.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by beesy
    Thats why I think he was dumping the sock. Huge risk to set up lie, HUGE. I think he was upset when he found out about the sock for two reasons, 1. he thought he'd made it and the sock was gone or 2. He knew he missed but hadn't told the Queen of the castle yet. When did he find that out in relation to those bruises on her arm?
    http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/8/8_1_224.gif
    Ok...say we buy into the dumping theory......why do they get so upset? Why worry about the sock? It didn't prove or disprove anything. Of course....unless he thought the sock MIGHT get them to looking into the gutter for other things???? Hummmmmm could that be it? OR, as you have said, not wanting to get the B*tch of the hill's panties(thong) twisted into knots. I just don't really see what the sock did or did not prove. Am I missing something here? <entirely possible...lol>


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,867
    Quote Originally Posted by beesy
    Thats why I think he was dumping the sock. Huge risk to set up lie, HUGE. I think he was upset when he found out about the sock for two reasons, 1. he thought he'd made it and the sock was gone or 2. He knew he missed but hadn't told the Queen of the castle yet. When did he find that out in relation to those bruises on her arm?
    Hi Beesy........I am lurking in this Darlie thread (and trying really hard to read all I can so as not to make you all answer things you've already answered) BUT, can I ask why he was throwing out a sock that only had a few drops (if that) of blood on it? I could see if the sock was drenched in blood but a drop or two on a sock that might have been nearby could have just been part of the scene, no? What else do you think might have been tossed in the drain? A shirt he was wearing maybe? Even if the sock had Darlies DNA on it, how does tossing it help or hurt this case? Why toss anything out?

    Just trying to understand.

    PS..........I feel that Darin was as much a part of this as Darlie was....JMO.........back to lurking/reading.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,867
    Quote Originally Posted by deandaniellws
    Ok...say we buy into the dumping theory......why do they get so upset? Why worry about the sock? It didn't prove or disprove anything. Of course....unless he thought the sock MIGHT get them to looking into the gutter for other things???? Hummmmmm could that be it? OR, as you have said, not wanting to get the B*tch of the hill's panties(thong) twisted into knots. I just don't really see what the sock did or did not prove. Am I missing something here? <entirely possible...lol>
    Oops.......sorry you and I said the same thing about the sock....

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by SanQuentinvisitor
    Hi Beesy........I am lurking in this Darlie thread (and trying really hard to read all I can so as not to make you all answer things you've already answered) BUT, can I ask why he was throwing out a sock that only had a few drops (if that) of blood on it? I could see if the sock was drenched in blood but a drop or two on a sock that might have been nearby could have just been part of the scene, no? What else do you think might have been tossed in the drain? A shirt he was wearing maybe? Even if the sock had Darlies DNA on it, how does tossing it help or hurt this case? Why toss anything out?

    Just trying to understand.

    PS..........I feel that Darin was as much a part of this as Darlie was....JMO.........back to lurking/reading.
    We don't know either SQV! That's why we drive around in circles!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,867
    Quote Originally Posted by deandaniellws
    We don't know either SQV! That's why we drive around in circles!
    yeah, I can see that. I am so intrigued by this case. Not that I find Darlie particularly intriguing but that she/they committed such an awful crime and the reasonings are so vague and off the wall. Why leave the baby alive? She was in no better situation with infant still alive as she was with the other two. I have more than one kid and one is as expensive as three.........

    I am trying to catch up......Read a few versions of her stories but am getting a bit redeyed by the small discrepencies........... Intruder- Intruder(s)- attempt sexual assault or just an attack???

    There is no rational reason why a person or persons would break into a home with 'lights from a TV on'- walk into a room and slaughter two babies/ leaving the adult who could identify them to be the last attack and NOT take a single thing or head up stairs to kill the male in the home..........didn't happen. IMO.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    11,210
    Quote Originally Posted by SanQuentinvisitor
    yeah, I can see that. I am so intrigued by this case. Not that I find Darlie particularly intriguing but that she/they committed such an awful crime and the reasonings are so vague and off the wall. Why leave the baby alive? She was in no better situation with infant still alive as she was with the other two. I have more than one kid and one is as expensive as three.........

    I am trying to catch up......Read a few versions of her stories but am getting a bit redeyed by the small discrepencies........... Intruder- Intruder(s)- attempt sexual assault or just an attack???

    There is no rational reason why a person or persons would break into a home with 'lights from a TV on'- walk into a room and slaughter two babies/ leaving the adult who could identify them to be the last attack and NOT take a single thing or head up stairs to kill the male in the home..........didn't happen. IMO.
    Of course it didn't. I don't think they thought they could get away with killing all three kids, yet leaving both of them alive...so he was spared. Poor kid. I wonder if he will one day wake up and all of the sudden be afraid of his parents?

Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Found Alive TX - Christine Woo (fnd dec'd), 39, & 3 kids, Frisco, 28 March 2016
    By SCHMAE in forum Located Persons Discussion
    Replies: 607
    Last Post: 04-27-2016, 08:00 PM
  2. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-07-2012, 10:29 AM

Tags for this Thread