718 users online (79 members and 639 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 26 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 386
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,299

    MO - Kent Heitholt, 48, found murdered, Columbia, 1 Nov 2001

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/...n1322783.shtml
    I just read about this case for the first time, and it is a doozy. It kind of reminds me of the WM3 case.

    2:15AM Halloween of 2001, sports editor Kent Heitholt was killed in the parking lot of the newspaper where he worked.
    January 2004, police got a tip that Chuck Erickson, a high school junior at the time of the killing, told friends he had a dream that he did it, along with his friend Ryan Ferguson.
    When police first interviewed him, he was hazy on the details. But as they led him through the story, again and again, he altered his version to fit their facts.
    Ryan was brought in, and denied everything. Today, they are both in prison; Chuck serving 25 years he was given in a plea deal; Ryan, convicted at trial, and sentenced to 40 years.
    But even Kent's colleagues weren't convinced by the evidence, and with physical evidence that just doesn't fit, I'm not either. Here's a link with lots of other articles. I'd love to know what you guys think.
    http://www.showmenews.com/Heitholt/index.asp

    I think this one is juicy enough and complicated enough to get its own section!!
    Last edited by Harmony 2; 11-05-2013 at 06:43 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,395
    Did you watch it last night on 48 Hours? It was intriguing... and my gut feeling says they're guilty.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,299
    No, and I would have loved to have. Did they show either of them talking?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,395
    Yes, both. Neither Chuck or his family would give an interview to 48 Hours, but they had plenty of footage of him testifying at Ryan's trial, and also footage of his interviews with police. Ryan did speak with 48 Hours, as did his sister and parents. They also aired pieces of Ryan's interview with police. Ryan struck me as being a very cold individual.

    During Ryan's trial, Chuck demonstrated how he beat Mr. Heitholt over the head, and also demonstrated how Ryan strangled him with the belt.

    Several jurors were also interviewed by 48 Hours.


    A friend of mine brought up an interesting point about Chuck's testimony, about the part where he demonstrated how Ryan strangled him with the belt. They were showing a distant shot of the crime scene, and it appeared to her that Mr. Heitholt was found on his back, face up. During his testimony, he said Ryan put the belt around his neck, then pulled up on it while stepping on Mr. Heitholt's back. This story would not match how Mr. Heitholt was found, if in fact he was found on his back. Neither of us was sure from seeing the photos on the show last night. It's definitely a story I want to follow for any new developments.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8

    Chuck Erickson & Ryan Ferguson

    I saw the 48 hours mystery show last night and I really don't believe the State proved their case. I can't understand how two drunk teenagers could murder someone so violently, and not leave any evidence behind. They would have had blood all over them. Did the police look at the clothes they were wearing that night? Chuck in his interview with the detectives said that he thought Ryan strangled Kent with a bungee cord from his car, and only changed his mind after the police told them it was with Kent's belt. The police were definitely giving Chuck the details of the crime.
    I have the most problem with the lack of physical evidence though. They said there were bloody shoe prints at the scene that did not match either Chuck or Ryan, well who's were they then?
    The janitor was so unbelievable to me too. He said he couldn't give a detailed description to the police of who he saw that night, (from what they showed last night he didn't give any description except that it was two men), and yet 2 years later while in jail, he sees the accused's picture in the newspaper, and is then able to say under oath that they were the two men he saw that night. I don't buy it! One jurror said that that is what made up his mind. Another jurror said that the look in Chuck's eye when he looked at Ryan made up her mind. I can't believe that you can convict someone of murder on a look.
    The only thing that makes me wonder, is why would Chuck say they did this if they didn't. I guess he really believes that they did do it, or they really did.
    I have to say from what they showed last night, I would have had reasonable doubt if I was on the jury.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    the beautiful SF Bay area
    Posts
    1,302

    I don't know

    Neither side was very convincing. I agree...two drunk teenagers are not going to be able to pull that off. No witness to anything. The security guard who couldn't identify the people at the time of the crime, mysteriously could point them out in court by the trial date...hmmmm....he happened to be in prison at that time. No correlation I'm sure.
    The footage of him in the police car showed the police telling him where and how everything happened. Chuck did not have a clue at the time. I also agree that Ryan doesn't seem to have any feelings at all; a pretty cold hearted person from the looks of it. I wouldn't have a hard timing believing that he is capable of such a crime but I don't think there was any compelling proof and I am amazed that they are in jail.
    Even the victims daughter wasn't sure they had the right people. She seemed convinced at the end once the jury convicted them, but throughout the entire show she wasn't convinced either. Pretty weak case.
    Last edited by lymom3; 02-20-2006 at 03:32 AM. Reason: Add last paragraph

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    806
    I watched the show with great interest. I find this case baffling.
    How can there be NO physical evidence when this crime wasn't even premeditated?

    Also, there was an unidentified hair found in the victim's hand, which did NOT match either Ryan or Chuck.

    Ryan definitely seemed to lack emotion, which I found disturbing, but that doesn't make him a killer.

    I don't think the police did even a remotely thorough job investigating this case.

    WHY would Chuck say they did it if they didn't?
    Also, who else would have had motive to commot such a violent
    crime on a reportedly well liked family man with no known enemies?

    Any thoughts??

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by snowy97
    Did the police look at the clothes they were wearing that night?
    Wasn't it 2 years after the murder before they were looked at as suspects? IMO, they could have had blood all over them and their clothes and could have easily disposed of everything and cleaned up w/o anyone seeing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    59
    I saw the episode on 48 Hours, and I found the story about the belt to be odd as well. I would assume that Kent was on his back for someone to undo the belt from his waist. It was stated in court that Ryan was choking Kent with the belt while Kent was facedown on the pavement. Finally, Kent was photographed dead lying face-up. Why/how did one boy flip Kent twice just to choke him? Kent appears to be a large man. Has anyone found his height and weight info? Whose fingerprints were on the belt?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    32,579
    I saw this show as well and I don't believe the witnesses against the defendent. I was surprised the jury found him guilty.

    The part about stepping on his back during the strangling, yet he was found face up seems as if it might have merit, IMO. Also, I caught that part about LE giving the witness details he didn't know. AND, I don't believe the janitor either. He's not going to not see them upon initial interview but remember years later with a positive ID.

    IMO, this jury was wrong,............all wrong.

    JMHO
    fran


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by bertajo
    Has anyone found his height and weight info?
    6'3", 315 lbs

    http://www.showmenews.com/2005/Oct/20051020News007.asp

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,299
    Kent's size really bothered me too. If you're going to mug someone for beer money, why pick a guy who's 6'3" and 310 pounds? Then take his watch and car keys instead of his wallet? Is that really the easiest way for a guy who drives a Mercedes to get cash?

    I couldn't find any mention of the teens doing anything violent in the past, either. No kicking dogs, beating up on little kids, etc. Zero to 100, all in the first crime?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,521
    I find it incredibly interesting the way 48 hours does these shows. THEY provide what THEY want the viewer to think and feel. My assumption is that there is SO much to this story that wasn't on there (and I did watch it too)... that although it lead me to question MUCH of the story and I'm concerned about the fingerprint and hair found, I think the ONE son is very very very good at lying. He's extraordinarily convincing. IF they can find out the source of the limited evidence they have, they'll have their answer.


    The saddest thing? EITHER the kid is innocent and his "friend" is FRUCKED UP OR he's such a "good little boy" and his poor parents are going to spend their lifesavings and retirement to help him..... and they'll be none the wiser.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8

    chuck Erickson & Ryan Ferguson

    Wasn't it 2 years after the murder before they were looked at as suspects? IMO, they could have had blood all over them and their clothes and could have easily disposed of everything and cleaned up w/o anyone seeing.
    You're right, I completely forgot that it had been two years.

    As someone else mentioned I also thought it was strange that they would pick a man of Kent's size to mug. This case is really strange because I just can't figure out why Chuck would say they did it if they didn't I did think Ryan was very cold about the whole thing. I can't even imagine being accused and convicted of something I didn't do, especially if it was my friend was the one accusing me. I would think I would be very emotional! Still I don't think the State proved their case.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    806
    Snowy...I agree. If I was accused of something I did not do, and realized the consequences I was about to face, I would probably have a complete emotional breakdown. It's bad enough when it's something you DID actually do, but to be falsely accused must be so horrible.
    Ryan acted as cool as a cucumber....as if he was accused of a speeding ticket. In fact, I get more emotional when I get a speeding ticket!! LOL

    This case was NOT investigated properly.

Page 1 of 26 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY SC - Marion Spencer, 50, found murdered near Columbia zoo, 17 Sept 2012
    By tarabull in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-07-2016, 03:37 AM
  2. CONVICTION OVERTURNED AK - Kent Leppink, 36, murdered, Hope, 2 May 1996
    By Alaska4959 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 684
    Last Post: 12-27-2015, 01:05 AM
  3. GUILTY SC - Three people found murdered in drainage pipe, Columbia, 2 Nov 2006
    By Shadow205 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-21-2015, 01:10 PM
  4. IA IA - Ricky Morehouse, 2, Kent, 3 March 2001
    By los2188 in forum Cold Cases
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-13-2014, 04:19 PM
  5. GUILTY PA - Raquel Carter, 16, found murdered, Homewood, 29 April 2001
    By mysteriew in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-13-2005, 10:19 AM

Tags for this Thread