1080 users online (215 members and 865 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,341

    IL - Heather Todd, 31, shot to death during burglary, Beaverville, 22 May 2006

    A tool shed is bulglarized. The homeowner shoots and kills a woman, who was the getaway driver. The man who burglarized the tool shed ends up charged with murder.

    Make sure you warn your children about how "felony murder" works.

    http://www.watsekatimesrepublic.com/.../388news01.txt
    It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    19,111
    Quote Originally Posted by Wudge
    A tool shed is bulglarized. The homeowner shoots and kills a woman, who was the getaway driver. The man who burglarized the tool shed ends up charged with murder.

    Make sure you warn your children about how "felony murder" works.
    Indeed. I thought the purpose of "felony murder" laws was to discourage criminals from using lethal weapons while committing crimes.

    If the burglar was unarmed (and the account mentions no weapons except for the homeowner's gun), this is a particularly ill-advised use of a felony murder law, IMHO.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    I think the rule is, if anyone dies during the commission of a felony, then it is felony murder. If someone breaks into an old man's house, and he trips and falls down the stairs hits his head and dies or if he has a heart attack, that could also come under the felony murder charge.
    Though it is odd that they aren't charging the home owner also. Usually, unless the homeowner is in fear of their life, it is prosecuted. But they may send that one to the grand jury, and let them make a decision on the home owner.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Nova
    Indeed. I thought the purpose of "felony murder" laws was to discourage criminals from using lethal weapons while committing crimes.

    If the burglar was unarmed (and the account mentions no weapons except for the homeowner's gun), this is a particularly ill-advised use of a felony murder law, IMHO.

    This reads to be a toolshed burglary where the burglar was weaponless.

    In most every state, even an accidental or otherwise unitentional death that occurs as a result of "any felony", will produce a felony murder charge.

    Some kids first experience with breaking the law results in a felony murder charge. A life sentence is not uncommon. Obviously, a very hard way to learn what felony murder is.
    It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,116
    Quote Originally Posted by mysteriew
    I think the rule is, if anyone dies during the commission of a felony, then it is felony murder. If someone breaks into an old man's house, and he trips and falls down the stairs hits his head and dies or if he has a heart attack, that could also come under the felony murder charge.
    Though it is odd that they aren't charging the home owner also. Usually, unless the homeowner is in fear of their life, it is prosecuted. But they may send that one to the grand jury, and let them make a decision on the home owner.
    The way I look at it is, If somebody is breaking into my property then they are there to do me harm. How was this old man not to think that them breaking into to the tool shed and maybe he was next. I would have done the same exact thing.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Not Of This World
    Posts
    21,642
    Quote Originally Posted by bakerprune64
    The way I look at it is, If somebody is breaking into my property then they are there to do me harm. How was this old man not to think that them breaking into to the tool shed and maybe he was next. I would have done the same exact thing.
    Some states are far more lenient and have "Castle Laws" that allow you to use lethal force without having to retreat, or in the most lenient states, even if they are unarmed, etc. but on your property committing a crime. Those kinds of laws are more and more frequent. Otherwise yes, I am surprised the homeowner wasn't charged.

    ETA: Dog the Bounty Hunter (Dwayne Chapman) did 5 years in prison for murder when the guy he was with shot and killed a man during a robbery.


    Follow me on the Twitter! @EricDiesel1972

    Deuteronomy 18:10-12 (KJV)

    10 There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, 11 or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. 12 For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord. (KJV)

    Follow me at my Biblical Blog: http://scripture-demystified.blogspot.com

    Baruch ha Shem Adonai.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,341
    Quote Originally Posted by bakerprune64
    The way I look at it is, If somebody is breaking into my property then they are there to do me harm. How was this old man not to think that them breaking into to the tool shed and maybe he was next. I would have done the same exact thing.
    The issue a homeowner would face in some states is one of" reasonable versus excessive force".

    The question would be: Was his killing of the woman getaway driver reasonable?
    It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Knight
    Some states are far more lenient and have "Castle Laws" that allow you to use lethal force without having to retreat, or in the most lenient states, even if they are unarmed, etc. but on your property committing a crime. Those kinds of laws are more and more frequent. Otherwise yes, I am surprised the homeowner wasn't charged.

    ETA: Dog the Bounty Hunter (Dwayne Chapman) did 5 years in prison for murder when the guy he was with shot and killed a man during a robbery.

    Did the homeowner leave his castle to kill the getaway driver? Or is a detached toolshed also a castle?
    It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Palm Springs
    Posts
    19,111
    Quote Originally Posted by bakerprune64
    The way I look at it is, If somebody is breaking into my property then they are there to do me harm. How was this old man not to think that them breaking into to the tool shed and maybe he was next. I would have done the same exact thing.
    I don't think the issue here is the homeowner's use of force. He hasn't been charged.

    The issue is whether an accomplice is guilty of murder because the homeowner shot one of the burglars. That's quite a stretch - by any fair definition of murder - particularly since there is no mention of the burglars themselves using, or even threatening, lethal force.

    I'm not calling for the homeowner to be charged (though I'm not fond of shooting criminals in flight). I'm just saying this isn't the situation for a "felony murder" charge.

    The circumstances would be quite different (I think we'll all agree), IF the victim had been shot and killed.

  10. #10
    OneLostGrl's Avatar
    OneLostGrl is offline I'm going against the grain- I'm going sane
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Myrtle Beach
    Posts
    14,316
    Perhaps in a way it's a good message to send criminals. Ya shouldn't be breaking into someones house anyway and whatever happens while your doing it will count too!

    Easy way to avoid the felony murder charge- don't break the law!!!


  11. #11
    OneLostGrl's Avatar
    OneLostGrl is offline I'm going against the grain- I'm going sane
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Myrtle Beach
    Posts
    14,316
    Quote Originally Posted by Wudge
    Did the homeowner leave his castle to kill the getaway driver? Or is a detached toolshed also a castle?
    Does it really matter?? SHOULD it really matter? They were breaking into the man's property! They were going to steal HIS stuff that HE worked his azz off to pay for! I'd have done the same thing, sorry!

    Again, the moral of the story is that they shouldn't be commiting the crime in the first place so whatever happens while they are- they should be held accountable! Perhaps if they were, there'd be less crime cuz people would think about what they were going to do a bit harder before doing it!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    6,341
    Quote Originally Posted by OneLostGrl
    Does it really matter?? SHOULD it really matter? They were breaking into the man's property! They were going to steal HIS stuff that HE worked his azz off to pay for! I'd have done the same thing, sorry!

    Again, the moral of the story is that they shouldn't be commiting the crime in the first place so whatever happens while they are- they should be held accountable! Perhaps if they were, there'd be less crime cuz people would think about what they were going to do a bit harder before doing it!
    I certainly agree that crimes should be punished. But I am not a fan of the statutory felony murder charge. That's why I ask for parents to make sure that their kids know the potential consequences for commiting a felony.

    You asked two good questions regarding the burglary being taking place in a toolshed. Does it matter? Should it matter?

    I have not yet determined that Illinois has a "castle" law. So I can't answer the question of: Does it matter? However, regarding the question of: Should it matter? I think the use of a twelve guage shotgun to kill the driver might well have been very excessive.

    I am not sure that the burglar had even gotten back to the getaway vehicle, nor is it yet clear that the vehicle was moving. Plus, there is the question of where the vehicle was parked; i.e., was it parked on a public street or his property? So more facts are needed.

    I support castle laws that allow a person to kill people who are attempting to break into their home, but, to me, a detached toolshed offers a much different situation.

    On a side note, an interesting thought just came to bear on my mind. The Supreme Court recently ruled that LE can legally enter a home without knocking. In states that have castle laws, the homeowner can legally kill people who do so. I have little doubt that we will be hearing of an officer who was legally killed by a homeowner who lives in a castle law state.
    It's not what a man knows that makes him a fool, it's what he does know that ain't so. .... Josh Billings

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,395

    Thank you!

    Quote Originally Posted by OneLostGrl
    Does it really matter?? SHOULD it really matter? They were breaking into the man's property! They were going to steal HIS stuff that HE worked his azz off to pay for! I'd have done the same thing, sorry!

    Again, the moral of the story is that they shouldn't be commiting the crime in the first place so whatever happens while they are- they should be held accountable! Perhaps if they were, there'd be less crime cuz people would think about what they were going to do a bit harder before doing it!
    Thank you for the voice of sanity! I was sitting hear reading and thinking to myself, "Are these people crazy? Are they trying to condemn the home owner?"

    This man was trying to protect his property, himself, and quite possibly a family (wife and kids). Bravo! To this man! I KNOW I would do whatever it takes to protect myself, my property and most especially my family. And hopefully he taught a lesson to the next robber/thief...

    “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sr.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Other End
    Posts
    25,761
    Quote Originally Posted by OneLostGrl
    Does it really matter?? SHOULD it really matter? They were breaking into the man's property! They were going to steal HIS stuff that HE worked his azz off to pay for! I'd have done the same thing, sorry!

    Again, the moral of the story is that they shouldn't be commiting the crime in the first place so whatever happens while they are- they should be held accountable! Perhaps if they were, there'd be less crime cuz people would think about what they were going to do a bit harder before doing it!
    I agree with this... Don't commit the crime if you can't do the time as they say..


    This post is my opinion only, and is subject to making me look totally confused

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    I think a lot of it does depend on what state it is. I remember a case in Ohio (I think his name was John Coyne) where a man owned a junk yard on the same property as his home. He had had problems with theft on the property. One night two kids about 15 years old, went on the property and were stealing stuff. He went out with a gun and shot at them, striking and killing one. They didn't charge the other kid, they charged the junkyard owner, and he served time.

    As a side note, I am not advocating the prosecution of the homeowner. But I do think that just because he isn't charged yet, doesn't mean he won't be charged. Many times charges like this will go to the grand jury before charges are filed.
    And I do think the question of reasonable force would be the question here.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. GUILTY WA - Heather Kelso, 29, & Kaden Lum, 2, shot to death, Bremerton, 28 March 2015
    By OkieGranny in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 01-02-2017, 11:44 PM
  2. GUILTY MN - Todd, 49, & Blake Besser, 27, shot to death, St Michael, 9 May 2015
    By los2188 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-08-2016, 09:56 PM
  3. GUILTY GA - Heather Strube, 25, shot to death, Snellville, 26 April 2009
    By EGirl in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-22-2015, 11:34 PM
  4. GUILTY FL - Darren, 37, & Heather Kaiser, 26, shot to death, Plant City, 15 Jan 2005
    By kittykat1 in forum Recently Sentenced and Beyond
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-24-2015, 12:29 PM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-16-2010, 01:19 AM

Tags for this Thread