1079 users online (166 members and 913 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 138
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    542
    Quote Originally Posted by anthrobones View Post
    http://www.doenetwork.us/cases/332ufok.html



    Unidentified White Female



    blue jeans, size 10; white bra, 38-D; panties which were large and not consistent with the blue jeans size; a two-piece wedding band set with a small diamond, which matched the wedding band of a male victim who also was found;

    [/color][/size][/color][/size][/color][/size][/color][/size]
    The oversize panties make me wonder whether she had been pregnant at some stage in the few years before her death. Maybe she bought some larger underpants to deal with that, and after the birth was continuing to wear them under jeans because they weren't going to fall down under a tight pair of trousers.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Here is the namus link to the male: https://identifyus.org/cases/5170
    Randy Sellers is ruled out as well as Jarrod Green
    More on the ring:
    Ring on the fourth finger of the left hand, yellow metal band, and the inside is inscribed with "14 K" and the letters "TW" within a circle.

    here is the namus link to the female: https://identifyus.org/cases/5170
    Bonnie Dages is ruled out as well as Jeanie Lofton

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Interesting tattoo on this missing woman, same initials. dates are off, but its possible.

    http://www.theyaremissed.org/ncma/ga...hp?A200502822S

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17,856
    Quote Originally Posted by mtrooper View Post
    Interesting tattoo on this missing woman, same initials. dates are off, but its possible.

    http://www.theyaremissed.org/ncma/ga...hp?A200502822S
    I dunno -- looks quite possible. From 1984 to 1995 is plenty of time to get married and have kids, but she'd still be within the age range for the UID. The facial resemblance is pretty strong. The height and weight fit. We know Wilkinson wore jewelry with her initials on it.

    I found it odd that his wedding band is described as having the initials in it but hers doesn't -- usually when a couple does matching bands, they're both engraved the same way.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    There was also no mention of a tattoo on Jane Doe, Tammie Wilkinson has a tattoo of a blue "heart" with the initials "KN-TW" and an "arrow" through it on upper right bicep.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17,856
    Quote Originally Posted by mtrooper View Post
    There was also no mention of a tattoo on Jane Doe, Tammie Wilkinson has a tattoo of a blue "heart" with the initials "KN-TW" and an "arrow" through it on upper right bicep.
    Skeletal remains a year old wouldn't show tattoos, would they?

    Wait, he had tattoos. But I was sure hers said partial skeletal...Let me go check that.

    Okay, this is interesting. Her remains are described as "decomposed and mummified," and postmortem interval of about a year. His is one month.
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ontario but a trucker so everywhere.
    Posts
    14,984
    Quote Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
    Skeletal remains a year old wouldn't show tattoos, would they?

    Wait, he had tattoos. But I was sure hers said partial skeletal...Let me go check that.

    Okay, this is interesting. Her remains are described as "decomposed and mummified," and postmortem interval of about a year. His is one month.
    bbm

    I think that is a mistake. I see where she was decomposed and mummified and he was decomposed but all I am seeing is that they were murdered around March 18, 1995 and found April 9, 1995 together, about 3 weeks. I think NamUS has it wrong.

    He has tattoos ( Also he had a mustache )
    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/419umok.html

    https://identifyus.org/cases/5170


    She doesn't have tattoos
    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/332ufok.html

    https://identifyus.org/cases/5174
    Last edited by RubyRed; 09-13-2010 at 01:02 PM.

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17,856
    Quote Originally Posted by RubyRed View Post
    bbm

    I think that is a mistake. I see where she was decomposed and mummified and he was decomposed but all I am seeing is that they were murdered around March 18, 1995 and found April 9, 1995 together, about 3 weeks. I think NamUS has it wrong.

    He has tattoos ( Also he had a mustache )
    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/419umok.html

    https://identifyus.org/cases/5170


    She doesn't have tattoos
    http://www.doenetwork.org/cases/332ufok.html

    https://identifyus.org/cases/5174
    What, Namus make a mistake?????

    I wonder why his reconstruction showed him bald, but doesn't show him with a mustache?
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ontario but a trucker so everywhere.
    Posts
    14,984
    Quote Originally Posted by carbuff View Post
    What, Namus make a mistake?????

    I wonder why his reconstruction showed him bald, but doesn't show him with a mustache?
    bbm

    If he had a mustache they should show him with one. moo

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,613
    Age, height, weight etc all match Benjamin Cannon, and his disappearance may have something to do with a cult, perhaps he and the woman were wed in some type of cult ceremony and that is why they are not tied together, because no one knew they were married? I dunno lol

    https://www.findthemissing.org/cases/1969/4/


  11. #71
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Do you think Tammi is worth calling in? I am thinking if the remains were mummiffied, or if animals disturbed her it might not still be able to be seen. Namus lists her as "Not recognizable - Partial skeletal parts only" I am still very interested in the initials on the wedding ring.

  12. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    17,856
    Quote Originally Posted by mtrooper View Post
    Do you think Tammi is worth calling in? I am thinking if the remains were mummiffied, or if animals disturbed her it might not still be able to be seen. Namus lists her as "Not recognizable - Partial skeletal parts only" I am still very interested in the initials on the wedding ring.
    I think it's worth a shot -- I agree that the tattoo might not have survived, and the rest is very close.
    Opinions expressed are strictly my own (who else would they belong to???)

  13. #73
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    1,613
    Are they engraved initials or a manufacturer's stamp? I was thinking it was a manufacturer's stamp as it mentioned it along with the 14k but didn't say anything about it being engraved. My engagement ring has a letter stamped in it but I don't know what it is for or what it means.

  14. #74
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Ok, Spoke with the ME's office and with LE from Kansas City. They both seem excited, and now we are waiting on a dental match. The Jane doe was decomposed too much to see any tattoo's. She was not in nearly as good of shape as the John Doe. She attributed it to body fat (the fatter you are the slower you decompose). The initals are only engraved in the ring the male was wearing. Hopefully we will know more soon dentals are available for both.

  15. #75
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,088
    Wow, that was quick. Not a match. Jane doe only had one filling and and Tammi had 4. Bummer. Back to the drawing board.

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. CA CA - Ludlow, WhtFem UP2517, 17-22, buried w/ WhtMale UP2578, Nov'80
    By CarlK90245 in forum The Unidentified
    Replies: 86
    Last Post: 09-24-2017, 01:38 PM
  2. TX TX - Houston, WhtFem UP701 & WhtMale UP703, 18-30, in woods, Jan'81
    By PonderingThings in forum The Unidentified
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-06-2017, 10:23 PM
  3. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-02-2015, 12:51 PM
  4. CA Rakesh Pal Gopi (18) - Pittsburg CA, 1991
    By SheWhoMustNotBeNamed in forum Missing Children in America - A Profile
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-03-2010, 06:15 PM

Tags for this Thread