California charges

tybee204 said:

I was talking to a friend in California that is a Lawyer and she told me that the Statue of Limitations should have already expired on the charges against John Carr. Felony Child *advertiser censored* has a 3 year Statue and Misdemeaner has a 1 year Statue


Existing Law: There is a 3-year statute of limitations for felony offenses involving child *advertiser censored*, which commences on the date of the offense. There is a one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses involving child *advertiser censored* and unlawful videotaping, which commences on the date of the offense.


Has anyone found anything on the California Case and if the warrents are still valid?

Click to expand...

tybee204 said:

I was talking to a friend in California that is a Lawyer and she told me that the Statue of Limitations should have already expired on the charges against John Carr. Felony Child *advertiser censored* has a 3 year Statue and Misdemeaner has a 1 year Statue


Existing Law: There is a 3-year statute of limitations for felony offenses involving child *advertiser censored*, which commences on the date of the offense. There is a one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses involving child *advertiser censored* and unlawful videotaping, which commences on the date of the offense.


Has anyone found anything on the California Case and if the warrents are still valid?

Click to expand...

tybee204 said:

I was talking to a friend in California that is a Lawyer and she told me that the Statue of Limitations should have already expired on the charges against John Carr. Felony Child *advertiser censored* has a 3 year Statue and Misdemeaner has a 1 year Statue


Existing Law: There is a 3-year statute of limitations for felony offenses involving child *advertiser censored*, which commences on the date of the offense. There is a one-year statute of limitations for misdemeanor offenses involving child *advertiser censored* and unlawful videotaping, which commences on the date of the offense.


Has anyone found anything on the California Case and if the warrents are still valid?

Click to expand...

Buzzm1 said:

Yes, but, if I am not mistaken, since he skipped before his rearrest for parole violation, and missed his January, 2002 trial, the statute of limitations clock stopped.

Click to expand...

dragonfly707 said:

It was not probation or parole he violated it was the terms of his supervised release.

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060817/NEWS/60817006/1033/NEWS01

Quote:
A warrant was issued for his arrest for violation of supervised release, and the sheriff’s department has had no contact with him since, Sgt. Rob Giordano said.

Click to expand...

JBean said:

wait what parole?..i missed that.
Do you mean probation? But even if you do, probation for what? Probation violation would be a whole other charge ,as well as, a bench warrant for FTA.

Click to expand...

Buzzm1 said:

Oct. 5: After a series of court hearings, Karr was released from jail, but was ordered to report to a probation officer and avoid child *advertiser censored*, children and places where children congregate, such as schools, beaches and parks The court records in the case were sealed.

_ November: A judge issues a restraining order, compelling Karr to stay 100 yards away from his wife and three children for three years.

_ December: A warrant was issued for Karr's arrest after authorities said he violated the terms of his supervised release.

Click to expand...