Until we hear more in the way of an indictment, on the surface it appears that this guy Karr is a nutter and just may want to hitch his wagon to the most notorious child murder case in history. Im far from convinced he is the guilty party. At this point I dont think anyone of us knows enough to form an intelligent opinion about Karrs guilt or innocence.
But, I have some questions for the Ramseys are guilty crowd. Why do you want the Ramsey family to be found guilty of JonBenets murder? Is it because you have so much time and energy invested in believing them (or some of them guilty), that you cant be open-minded about the possibility of someone else being the guilty party?
Why do some of you delight in vilifying Lou Smit and his conclusions of an intruder did it theory? Is it because he prayed with the Ramseys? Is that a good reason to discount his observations and conclusions as a seasoned investigator? What is it about Smit and his background that would make his conclusions not credible?
Its hard for me to understand the hatred some have for John Ramsey (a man youve never met and dont personally know) in particular. This is a man who lost a daughter in 1992, lost another daughter in 1996, and lost his wife in 2006 all of whom he should have out-lived in the normal course of events. This is a tremendous amount of tragedy for one person to experience.
Im not asking these questions to start a fight (so everyone mind your manners, ok?). Im asking because I truly want to understand this perspective. And try as I might, I just cant understand it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/01/48hours/main523884.shtml
But, I have some questions for the Ramseys are guilty crowd. Why do you want the Ramsey family to be found guilty of JonBenets murder? Is it because you have so much time and energy invested in believing them (or some of them guilty), that you cant be open-minded about the possibility of someone else being the guilty party?
Why do some of you delight in vilifying Lou Smit and his conclusions of an intruder did it theory? Is it because he prayed with the Ramseys? Is that a good reason to discount his observations and conclusions as a seasoned investigator? What is it about Smit and his background that would make his conclusions not credible?
Its hard for me to understand the hatred some have for John Ramsey (a man youve never met and dont personally know) in particular. This is a man who lost a daughter in 1992, lost another daughter in 1996, and lost his wife in 2006 all of whom he should have out-lived in the normal course of events. This is a tremendous amount of tragedy for one person to experience.
Im not asking these questions to start a fight (so everyone mind your manners, ok?). Im asking because I truly want to understand this perspective. And try as I might, I just cant understand it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/01/48hours/main523884.shtml