Results 31 to 45 of 117
08-28-2006, 10:00 PM #31Originally Posted by michelle
08-28-2006, 10:01 PM #32Originally Posted by close_enough
08-28-2006, 10:02 PM #33Originally Posted by lilpony
08-28-2006, 10:04 PM #34Registered User
Originally Posted by lilpony
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
I'm not trying to start anything here - none of us know for sure if your theory is correct, but - Why? Why do you have a hard time beleiving the R's could do this? It wouldn't be the first time parents killed thier child - not by a long shot. Wouldn't be the first time parents sexually abused a child either. There is no reason to eliminate the R's just because they are parents.
08-28-2006, 10:11 PM #35
"I really dont understand if the evidence is there against the Ramseys, what happened? I truly dont understand. What is the evidence? Is is that they acted "Weird" or there were fibers that were on JBR that matched PR sweater?"
Fibers from her sweater were found on the sticky side of the duct tape, the blanket her body was wrapped in, and tied INTO the knots of the cord she was strangled with. That's just for openers!
"Argue that with the judge, and the Grand Jury. Your peer group."
Just what is THAT supposed to mean?
"Second I also thought that I read PR was eliminated as the writer."
Nope, not even close.
"Fourth is this the Fibers from PR's sweater? And if so is it so uncommon that they would be on JBR? I mean she is her mom?"
But they weren't ON JBR. They were on items Patsy claimed she never saw or never went near wearing said sweater.
"How can they have no evidence against the Ramseys but so many are "sure" of their guilt?"
No evidence?! I've got a list I can have up in no time!
"The Grand jury, and a separate judge couldn't find reason to indict the Ramseys."
Much of the evidence wasn't IN when the GJ was in session and a judge who saw none of the police evidence. Dan Caplis talked about that today.
"Do people lhonestly think that if the evidence was there for an almsot certain ramsey hanging that the DA wouldn't have busted one of them by now?"
The DA has PROVEN to be biased toward the Ramseys as far back as 1998. It's a verifiable fact. I can show it to you if you want.
"They arrested a guy based on some emails. If they had this supposed "smoking gun" evidence for ramsey guilt they'd have acted on it."
I can't figure it either.
"There is evidence that was not presented to Judge Carnes or the Grand Jury that implicates the Ramsey's."
YES! Always a pleasure, LinasK!
The Ramsey's refused to take a polygraph or talk to LE for 4 months! And then, it was their own selected polygrapher, not one from the police! They tried to board John's private plane for Michigan, despite JB's body just being found- I think that should trump Christmas celebrations, don't you? Kinda like Scott Peterson and his parents still having Christmas dinner with the neighbor instead of looking for the "missing" wife they knew was already dead and by whom."
"Patsy was NOT eliminated as the writer of the note, we now know JMK didn't write it!"
"John's black shirt fibers were found on JB's genitals, that can't be explained except for sexual abuse."
And don't they know it!
"If they want to believe, what they believe, for whatever reason they believe, what they believe, who are we to argue with them."
Yeah, we foolishly cling to evidence in the face of adversity! LOL
"Fibres will travel."
To the basement?
"So the fibers that were on her were definatly JR's? I always thought that was a rumor???? See I am confused, lol..."
it's no rumor, michelle.
"It wouldn't be the first time parents killed thier child - not by a long shot. Wouldn't be the first time parents sexually abused a child either. There is no reason to eliminate the R's just because they are parents."
Not by a damn sight!
08-28-2006, 10:11 PM #36Inactive
Originally Posted by RJML
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
08-28-2006, 10:12 PM #37Registered User
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
If you haven't read all the transcripts in this case, don't complain why you don't understand the concept of RDI.
08-28-2006, 10:13 PM #38Inactive
Originally Posted by Chrishope
- Join Date
- Dec 2003
08-28-2006, 10:16 PM #39Originally Posted by Chrishope
Do you understand what I am trying to say?
08-28-2006, 10:17 PM #40
HmmmOriginally Posted by michelle
--->>>I for one would like to see ALL of the telephone records for Christmas Day AM, until 2 PM December 26th.
WE would know then who called whom, and what time anyone was called, 10 PM, 11PM, 12PM, 1AM etc etc.
Bank records would be good too, HOW much JR cash receivables the end of 1997 when JR sold his plane at a loss to his private pilot.
WE never knew ANY of this, which leaves wonderment for me.
Plus all of the ODD behaviors that WE have never seen in Marc Klaas, Ms. Runnion, Walsh etc. etc. OR ANY murdered childs parent.
.Opinions expressed by me, are mine, based on life experience, and known facts of any given case.
"""I am just a pixel in the universal plan."""
08-28-2006, 10:18 PM #41Originally Posted by twinkiesmom
08-28-2006, 10:19 PM #42Originally Posted by Camper
08-28-2006, 10:21 PM #43Originally Posted by lilponyThis is the year to locate Mark Dribin http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...ht=Mark+Dribin and Ilene Misheloff http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...lene+Misheloff and bring them home to their families!
Parents watch your children. Free-range parenting leads to more child victims.
Cruelty to humans begins with cruelty to animals.
I believe in closure, not forgiveness. I'm also unapologetically judgemental.
08-28-2006, 10:22 PM #44Former Member
Originally Posted by Buzzm1
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- New England
08-28-2006, 10:23 PM #45Originally Posted by close_enough