08-29-2006, 10:21 AM #1
I have 3 words: JOHN BENNET RAMSEY
I posted this on another thread but thought it deserved a thread of it's own
There are 3 good things that came out of John Mark Karr.
1.) He was removed off the streets and away from children
2.) He was exposed to every person in the world as a dangerous pedophile
3.) He put this case first and center and proved to me that the intruder theory is nonsense.
It's time to call in a special prosecutor in this case. Mary Lacy and the Boulder DA's office is CLEARLY incapable of investigating this crime.
I do feel sorry that Mrs. Lacy is receiving all the negative publicity she is getting. She simply has been ill informed in this case.
The DNA in JonBenet's panties is degraded folks. Most likely it did not get there from the night of the crime.
I find it funny that there were hand writing experts that came out publically on TV and basically ruined their reputation by saying John Karr wrote the ransom note. What does that say about their so called expertise? What does it say about possibly ever catching the perpetrator in this case?
What a hoopla this case has caused. From all angles.
So I wonder when John Bennet Ramsey is moving out of the country?
08-29-2006, 10:33 AM #2
Good thread, Ned. John Ramsey has a lot to answer for right about now. I'm so glad to see this case be brought right back into the public eye so it can be examined again. Bring on the special prosecutor! JonBenet has laid in her grave with no justice long enough.
I also could not believe the "experts" going on about the handwriting. Say...where's Wudge?Where is Trenton Duckett?
08-29-2006, 10:36 AM #3
"I find it incredible that Boulder authorities wasted thousands of taxpayer dollars to bring Karr to Colorado, given such a lack of evidence," said Gov. Bill Owens. "Mary Lacy should be held accountable for the most extravagant and expensive DNA test in Colorado history."
Ned: Let's get this case back on track where it belongs. I think when Mary Lacy starts paying back all us tax payers we should use it to bring in new people to investigate this crime.
I say we start with John Ramsey!
08-29-2006, 10:38 AM #4
"The guy had a lot of potential" as a suspect, Gray said. "(He) seemed to have a lot of knowledge about this that was not out in the public."
This guy is an idiot.
this guy had a lot of potential. Yeah he did as a pedophile. But not as the MURDERER of JonBenet.
"THIS WAS AN INSIDE JOB"-John Bennet Ramsey!
08-29-2006, 10:41 AM #5Originally Posted by Nedthan Johns
Totally agreed, Ned....I pray this case doesn't fade away again, b/c like you, I think the intruder theory has been disproved. It's time to get some by-the-book, unbiased special people on this case who can't be swayed by money and power and get some justice for JonBenet!!!
08-29-2006, 10:43 AM #6
What about 3 letters...D N A?
Why start with another person whose DNA we already know does not match?
Corpus Christi, Texas
08-29-2006, 10:48 AM #7
There's no proof that DNA came from the killer.
What about the fibers from John Ramsey's shirt being found on JonBenet's pubic area and in her underwear during the autopsy? John Ramsey had no innocent explanation for that when questioned about it in the Atlanta 2000 interviews. That says a lot more to me than some fragmented and degraded DNA that may or may not have come from the person who killed JonBenet.Where is Trenton Duckett?
08-29-2006, 10:50 AM #8
As you may or may not know having worked in the Biotech industry now for years, I have paid great attention to the DNA in this case.
Don't forget what Henry Lee stated: "This is NOT a DNA case"
This is the ONLY piece of evidence that IMO has kept the Ramsey's from facing charges.
I agree it does NOT belong on JonBenet's panties. But neither did the DNA of a 4 year old child that didn't live anywhere in vicinity of the Leitman case. Still he was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison. And he too was a father and didnít have a criminal background.
Wake up folks. See this case for what it is. There was a cover up here. Why the cover up? Why the crazy ransom note? Why the insatiable need by John Ramsey to ask his pilot to get his plane ready to leave just 30 minutes after finding their daughter murdered?
08-29-2006, 10:52 AM #9
Don't forget the red fibers from Patsy's sweater found on the garrote and in the paint tote yet she claimed to have never have gone down to that basement?
08-29-2006, 10:54 AM #10Originally Posted by Nedthan Johns
08-29-2006, 10:55 AM #11
I wonder what Patsy Ramsey thought of this nut case? She probably was happy because she thought the focus would be off her and John.
Does anyone know if any reporter was able to get a statement from John Ramsey regarding the DNA not matching?
08-29-2006, 10:58 AM #12Originally Posted by englishleigh
I just read in the Thomas book that the tape was laying sticky side up on the blanket once John removed it...those fibers could have come from anywhere in the home, including when Patsy threw herself on the body when it was brought upstairs..
Corpus Christi, Texas
08-29-2006, 11:03 AM #13Originally Posted by Nedthan Johns
Hi again Ned....I did not know your background, so thanks for that...
IMO Dr. Lee has lost lots of credibility post OJ.........
LKL Fri 8/25
I mean what are the odds that a factory worker sneezed on the exact spot where blood is found on a little girls underwear the night she is killed? The affidavit said the
KING: Dr. Kobilinsky, it's known that Dr. Henry Lee, another frequent guest on this show, found DNA on newly -- the newly purchased girl's underwear, tested right after the packaging. Do you think that fact may leave a misleading impression on the public?
KOBILINSKY: I think so actually, Larry. Let me explain why. When you take a garment, a brand new garment, you un-package it, you open it up, put it down on your laboratory bench and you look for the presence of DNA from its manufacturer.
What you do is you take a scalpel or a razor blade and you scrape the entire garment, the front, the back, the inside, the outside, so you're taking the entire area and then you take all of those scrapings and you isolate DNA. And, apparently Dr. Lee found the presence of some DNA.
That is a very far cry from looking at the panties of JonBenet which had a discreet little droplet of blood and from that droplet they were able to isolate DNA and we now know that it is from a male. It is not related to any member of the Ramsey family and therefore it's likely that it comes from the perpetrator, the intruder.
Corpus Christi, Texas
08-29-2006, 11:04 AM #14
Tex Mex, Patsy said she was never down in the basement in that jacket, and the tape did not come upstairs. John tore it off JonBenet's mouth and left it on the floor when he carried her up.
And correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't JonBenet covered up when Patsy threw herself on her? And that doesn't explain how the fibers would be TIED in the knot. TIED into it. That did NOT come from a hug.Where is Trenton Duckett?
08-29-2006, 11:09 AM #15Originally Posted by TexMexWhere is Trenton Duckett?
By Tricia in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 147Last Post: 09-26-2016, 11:36 AM
By Show Me in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 7Last Post: 05-23-2004, 10:12 AM
By candy in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 52Last Post: 03-15-2004, 01:59 PM