1174 users online (198 members and 976 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    3,868

    Grotesque Ignorance Exposed:By William Tucker (great article)

    http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10290


    "What's the biggest thing you've learned as an ADA?" I asked him.

    He twirled his mustache for a moment, reflected and said, "People are capable of anything."

    I wish that lesson had penetrated the head of Boulder County District Attorney Mary Keenan. We might have been spared the last two weeks' farce in the JonBenet Ramsey case.

    Was there ever any question that John Mark Karr, the 41-year-old schoolteacher paraded before the TV cameras for the last two weeks, was making the whole thing up? Did his professions of undying love for the victim ring one bit true? Or was he just a partially deranged weirdo obsessed with the case? To my mind, the only serious question was whether he was a true publicity-hound or just seeking plane fare back from Bangkok.

    What the whole incident revealed is the grotesque ignorance of the American press. Nobody has the slightest knowledge of police investigations. As any police detective can tell you, people confess to high-profile crimes all the time. Sometimes the investigators have to throw them out of their offices. God knows what motivates these people but it certainly has nothing to do with solving crimes. Yet newspapers and TV stations across the country immediately took the whole confession at face value. Across the country, newspapers wiped the dreary reports from Israel and Lebanon off their front page and ran nothing but "investigations" into this guy's sorry sex life.

    One afternoon the New York Post ran six full pages about Kann's private life. "PERV'S LAIR. INSIDE JONBENET SUSPECT'S SEEDY BANGKOK DEN OF SIN," trumpeted the Daily News. "SEX CHANGE SHOCKER" came next. (The word "shock" is the key to tabloid reporting, with "Britney Baby Shocker" the ideal headline. One new publication is dispensing with pretense altogether and naming itself "Shock!") Now I realize you can't expect much from the News and Post but unfortunately both are coupled to rather sensible editorial pages -- and remember, the alternative is reading the New York Times.

    The real fault, however, was with the prosecutors. From the beginning, a cloud of suspicion hung over the parents, John and Patsy Ramsey (who died last June of cancer). The Ramseys originally reported their daughter missing to friends and the police after finding a ransom note. The note, from a "small foreign faction," was an implausible garble of bravado and nonsense -- the kind that people make up when trying to cast suspicion elsewhere. When a cursory police search produced nothing, John Ramsey led another expedition that quickly discovered the body in the closet -- and messed up the crime scene in the proceedings. There was no sign of forced entry to the house. There was snow on the ground outside but no footprints.

    The couple clammed up early, hired lawyers, and refused to be interrogated or take lie-detector tests. The paintbrush used to garrote the victim came from Patsy Ramsey's paint box. The writer of the ransom note knew weird details about John Ramsey -- including that he had a business, used an attache case, and was from the South. The ransom demand for $118,000 was surprisingly small but exactly matched a bonus John Ramsey had recently received. Patsy's handwriting matched the note in some significant respects. Still, the DA's office could not put together a convincing case and a grand jury refused to indict. Two years ago Boulder police announced they would not investigate further.

    In pointing the finger, the Ramseys ended up accusing Chris Wolfe, a Boulder reporter, of being the killer. Wolfe sued the Ramseys for damages but lost. In issuing a decision, however, federal judge Julie Carnes noted, "[T]he weight of the evidence is more consistent with a theory that an intruder murdered JonBenet than it is with a theory that Mrs. Ramsey did it." This inspired Boulder District Attorney Mary Keenan to reopen the case. Her keystone cops office soon settled on Karr, who had been sending lurid e-mails to University of Colorado professor Michael Tracey. Karr fit the profile of an ideal intruder -- a middle-class white male pedophile -- and so he was arrested on nothing more than his own words. The newspapers took it from there.

    It's worth following up all possibilities and if anyone else wants to confess to the murder, they should be checked out as well. But the facts of the case remain hard to avoid. The overwhelming evidence is that John and Patsy Ramsey somehow acted in concert in the murder of their child. The most likely scenario is that the father was sexually abusing the daughter and the mother killed her out of jealousy. Not even a marital bond would be likely to keep one of them from cracking unless both were involved.
    -
    My opinion and nothing but my opinion.

    Tor:Con Index link below. Will show you the probability of a tornado happening in your area.
    http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-torcon-index

    FEMA's link for Emergency Supplies list below or what you need to survive for three days in case help is not immediately available to you.
    http://www.ready.gov/document/family-supply-list

    You can also purchase a weather radio which will inform you of severe weather even if your electricity goes out. Runs on batteries of course.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,748
    When writing a comment such as this, it's useful to find out the facts. because anyone interested in reading it will probably have more information:

    When a cursory police search produced nothing, John Ramsey led another expedition that quickly discovered the body in the closet
    i believe she was found in the basement, not 'the closet'? so maybe the author should go back to research 101 class?

    btw, that's a pretty hefty chunk of copy and paste there - all but the final paragraph, which brings into question copyright. and it's usually easier to read such an amount of text when laid out professionally on the website rather than in a post on a message board.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    3,868
    I edited my post Floh...and no I'm not a professional copy and paster! Which is why I like the forums...I'm not expected to pass some kind of school test.
    -
    My opinion and nothing but my opinion.

    Tor:Con Index link below. Will show you the probability of a tornado happening in your area.
    http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-torcon-index

    FEMA's link for Emergency Supplies list below or what you need to survive for three days in case help is not immediately available to you.
    http://www.ready.gov/document/family-supply-list

    You can also purchase a weather radio which will inform you of severe weather even if your electricity goes out. Runs on batteries of course.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,748
    Quote Originally Posted by Show Me
    I edited my post Floh...and no I'm not a professional copy and paster! Which is why I like the forums...I'm not expected to pass some kind of school test.

    Just link to the article after pasting maybe a paragraph or two, is what i'm suggesting. because that huge wadge of text is blur. i have no doubt you aren't a professional copy and paster and you needn't be.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    3,374
    yep--very good article--sums everything up in a matter-of-fact and common sense way--Ramseys are as guilty as sin

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    7,748
    Quote Originally Posted by Show Me
    I edited my post Floh...and no I'm not a professional copy and paster! Which is why I like the forums...I'm not expected to pass some kind of school test.
    What it really is is i was keen to read your perspective of the artricle and there wasn't a suggestion they weren't your words (in quotes, or italics etc.) and i read through the whole thing only to have read the link you had first provided. then i didcover i'm reading the same thing twice - apart from the last paragraph.

    which is sadly a waste of time - that's what got me.

    sorry you thought i thought you were "expected to pass some kind of school test". i didn't expect that, i only wanted to know what you thought of the article, that's all.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    West Coast of Canada
    Posts
    6,306
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Hamilton
    yep--very good article--sums everything up in a matter-of-fact and common sense way--Ramseys are as guilty as sin
    you make me chuckle-in a good way-i mean that- i dont agree but u remind me of my own firm opinions..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,475
    Good find Show!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    13,220
    Most excellent.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    713

    Thanks Show Me

    a really good find.


  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Floh
    When writing a comment such as this, it's useful to find out the facts. because anyone interested in reading it will probably have more information:



    i believe she was found in the basement, not 'the closet'? so maybe the author should go back to research 101 class?
    Wellll it was kinda a room within a room, right? Not so bad.

    Thanks for the article, Close Up.

    I'm happy someone is writing about Judge Carnes, hope they keep it up, it makes her look like a nut!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Mid-West
    Posts
    3,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Floh
    What it really is is i was keen to read your perspective of the artricle and there wasn't a suggestion they weren't your words (in quotes, or italics etc.) and i read through the whole thing only to have read the link you had first provided. then i didcover i'm reading the same thing twice - apart from the last paragraph.

    which is sadly a waste of time - that's what got me.

    sorry you thought i thought you were "expected to pass some kind of school test". i didn't expect that, i only wanted to know what you thought of the article, that's all.
    I liked the article and thought the writer did a good job expressing his opinion.
    It's obvious he didn't listen to Lin Woods spin and swallow it hook, line and sinker.
    -
    My opinion and nothing but my opinion.

    Tor:Con Index link below. Will show you the probability of a tornado happening in your area.
    http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-torcon-index

    FEMA's link for Emergency Supplies list below or what you need to survive for three days in case help is not immediately available to you.
    http://www.ready.gov/document/family-supply-list

    You can also purchase a weather radio which will inform you of severe weather even if your electricity goes out. Runs on batteries of course.