10-04-2006, 09:09 AM #1Registered User
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
Q's (Ransom note vs. Patsy's handwriting)
From the poster Tril 's signature at FFJ, I am just wondering how many people out there make their Q's like this:
(left) Ransom Note lower case "Q" (q) (right) Patsy Ramsey's exemplar lower case "Q" (q)
Source: http://www.acandyrose.com/02182003dh911motion.pdf (Page 31)
I know that the similarity of one letter is not causal evidence, but just how likely could it be that, if separate individuals were involved in authorship of the RN, Patsy and the "intruder" shared the same number 8 looking Q? Seems to be more than just a coincidence.
10-04-2006, 11:58 AM #2
Looks like a figure "8", doesn't it? I don't know anyone who does it like that.
but just how likely could it be that, if separate individuals were involved in authorship of the RN, Patsy and the "intruder" shared the same number 8 looking Q? Seems to be more than just a coincidence.I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.
10-04-2006, 12:22 PM #3
There's a reason Patsy was never excluded as the author of the ransom note - and those Qs are part of the reason.
I certainly do not believe any intruder would have been able to write a three page letter that looks that much like Patsy's handwriting. Even her own family members said the handwriting looked like hers.Where is Trenton Duckett?
10-04-2006, 12:35 PM #4Even her own family members said the handwriting looked like hers.
And I quote, people:
"Her writing may look similar."I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.
10-05-2006, 02:59 AM #5Originally Posted by leighl
Patsy and the writer of the note are the only two people who make their lower "q's" like this.
I'm with you Super Dave. I don't believe in coincidences.
10-05-2006, 11:13 AM #6I'm with you Super Dave. I don't believe in coincidences.I'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.
10-07-2006, 07:58 PM #7Registered User
Originally Posted by leighl
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
There is so much 'non evidence' due to initial crime scene bungling and so much supposition, which, although compelling is not hard evidence (eg linguistic analysis of the RN) that using Steve Thomas's criteria the only way this crime will be solved is by a confession.
This is my first post here but I have read threads on the forum for a while now. I didn't want to post until I had a good grasp of all the source materials available.
Just wanted to say that I really respect the way Tricia runs this forum, encouraging debate and not censoring discussion. We all have the same interests - trying to find the truth in this.
10-07-2006, 10:51 PM #8Registered User
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
Ouote by luckyeight:
"This is my first post here but I have read threads on the forum for a while now. I didn't want to post until I had a good grasp of all the source materials available."
Thank you very much. Many posters don't take the time to do that,it's much appreciated!
10-08-2006, 01:53 AM #9Registered User
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
Ive never seen anyone do 'q's like that, i first thought leighl made a mistake when saying this was meant to be a 'q' is was like no..more like the number 8. I agree with Tricia thats a major red flag.
10-08-2006, 05:17 AM #10
Okay, guys, I agree, so now what do you want to do about it????
So often times it happens that we live our life in chains, and we never even know we have the key. ...Eagles, "Already Gone"
10-09-2006, 12:44 PM #11Originally Posted by pocoI'm as mad as HELL and I'm NOT gonna take it anymore!.
By cynic in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 1003Last Post: 02-02-2014, 07:33 PM
By Tricia in forum Rebuttal to Discovery I.D. Show about JonBenetReplies: 0Last Post: 08-14-2011, 05:03 PM
By Sophie in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 28Last Post: 03-10-2010, 06:47 AM
By Zotto in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 25Last Post: 08-16-2009, 01:31 AM
By Callan in forum JonBenet RamseyReplies: 323Last Post: 09-21-2007, 10:36 PM