loyalalways said:I think it's ridiculous to think that Patsy brutally murdered her daughter because she wet the bed or because she was jealous of her. The person who did this is a very EVIL, very strong person with absolutely no compassion or heart. The grand jury were sickened by the autopsy pictures. They have vindicated ALL family members. Loving people don't just all of a sudden become brutal murderers.
I also think that JonBenet knew her killer because, for one thing she ate pineapple with him. So, that means that the perpetrator didn't use the stun gun right away.
I'm also beginning to wonder if John Mark Karr knows more than what the authorities have told us. For one thing, he knew the nickname of Patsy's mother. That had never been published anywhere. How did he know that???? He may not have killed her, but I think he was either there or knows who WAS there! The truth will come out eventually. I hope it's soon.
You bet! NP is one of the best-informed JBR case posters on the whole internet, and I'm convinced that someone like Mary Lacy doesn't know nearly as much about the case as NP, for otherwise Lacy would not have made a fool of herself with that Karr business.Daisy said:Nuisance, your posts make a heckuva lot of sense! :clap: I think had you been the DA in Boulder when this went down, there would be 2 rather prominent citizens sitting behind bars right now (well, one, since the other recently passed away).
Thanks. I'd have ruthlessly thorough, and you can bet both the Rs and Detective Thomas would have been questioned extensively.
They can,esp. if they are mentally unstable.I posted earlier about acute decompensation.Also,we don't know what affect the experimental chemo had on her brain,as well as early meno from the surgery...tied in all together,it could have had a very bad effect,and as I posted b/f,mentally ill ppl tend to be very manipualtive when they want to get their way,so they can fake being normal a LOT of the time,esp when they need to.From their point of view...they have no choice but to do so.Considering the video of Christmas morning 'disappeared' and JR made excuses about that,I can't help but think PR may have appeared unstable in it.loyalalways said:. The person who did this is a very EVIL, very strong person with absolutely no compassion or heart. The grand jury were sickened by the autopsy pictures. They have vindicated ALL family members. Loving people don't just all of a sudden become brutal murderers.
Yes, and as far as the grate goes...if it made a loud metal-on -concrete noise when it was being moved...then why would the perp move it BACK before leaving???That doesn't even make any sense..he wouldn't.He wouldn't risk making that loud noise yet again,so he'd simply move it once and,considering he'd just committed murder....run like all get out !!Nuisanceposter said:What signs of a break in? There was an intact spider web spanning the window that was purported to be the entrance, and there is absolutely no forensic evidence on that window - which measures 18 X 30 inches.
To quote Joe Pesci from "My Cousin Vinny"..."Everything that guy just said is bullsh!t."Jay78 said:evidence against patsy:
-her handwriting show similarities with that of the ranson note.
-fibres consistent with her clothing were on the duct tape, the rope that strangled her etc.
-the bowl of pineapple on the table had only her and burke's prints on it.
-she woke up in the same clothes the next morning, which was very unlike her.
- in general, the ramsey's were uncooperative with the police.
there is also the issue that the Ramsey's wanted to flee immediately after there daughter was found.
John & Patsy didnt seem to notice the deadline had passed and no "kidnapper" had called.
Fleet white looked into the room where JB's body was in quite the same manner John did and saw nothing
the ransom note was supposedly found on the stairs that Patsy came down every morning although there was other ways of going downstairs.
One must also consider the fact that anyone who entered that house said it was hard to find your way around. The police couldn't even find the lightswitch for the basement. Unlikely a perp would find his way around easily without waking anyone up.
there is even more evidence against the Ramsey than this and there are holes all over the intruder story such as:
the stun gun cannot be proven
the boot print has been said to belong to burke and the handprint on the door has been identified
it has been provent that underwear fresh out the package can have dna material on it
I have also heard the foreign pubic hair might be animal hair
if you discount the dna and stun gun, your left with the fact that the intruder left virtually no trace of himself/herself even though he/she had to enter from a window in the basement, go upstairs, get JB out of bed without make too much noise, feed her pineapple, brutally murder her and possibly write the ransom note....:waitasec:
You mean its published LInda Arndts book. Oh wow she must have really changed her mind from her interviews then. She did interview with local reporters.....loyalalways said:I disagree with you. You'll never convince me that a family member killed JonBenet. Even Linda Arndt believes it's not John or Patsy. Read her book. Of all the people I've talked to and the websites I've visited,I would say that 95% agree with me. Show me the PROOF that Patsy did it and I might believe you, but until then, forget it. Take a look at the results of the grand jury too. They DID agree that Patsy didn't do it.