IDIs On This Forum?

New Posts

F

Fenton

New Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2007
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, folks...I am a new member and would like to know if there are any others on this board that lean to the IDI theory?
 
Fenton said:
Hi, folks...I am a new member and would like to know if there are any others on this board that lean to the IDI theory?
Click to expand...

I am sure there are some Fenton, but I am not one of them. But welcome to the Forum.:D
 
Fenton said:
Hi, folks...I am a new member and would like to know if there are any others on this board that lean to the IDI theory?
Click to expand...

Not very many, as far as I can tell, and I certainly am not one. Welcome aboard...
 
Indeed, welcome. Even if the IDI here are fewer than RDI, it's always good to have that countering point of view to keep discussion active and interesting....otherwise we're all basically agreeing with each other.
 
Nuisanceposter said:
Indeed, welcome. Even if the IDI here are fewer than RDI, it's always good to have that countering point of view to keep discussion active and interesting....otherwise we're all basically agreeing with each other.
Click to expand...


I agree! LOL
 
That's right- it'd be very boring here if we all shared the same opinions- so welcome!
 
I lean towards the IDI theory ....
Both opinions are welcome as the owner is Definately a RDI but she ahs in the past appointed mods who are IDI's to watch this forum.

Welcome!!
 
Fenton said:
Hi, folks...I am a new member and would like to know if there are any others on this board that lean to the IDI theory?
Click to expand...

I really like this forum. I have seen no evidence of cliques, the posters are very polite, and there is a lot of good discussion.

But I do fly a RDI flag. And it is a big flag. A very big flag.
 
Albert18 said:
I really like this forum. I have seen no evidence of cliques, the posters are very polite, and there is a lot of good discussion.

But I do fly a RDI flag. And it is a big flag. A very big flag.
Click to expand...

I totally agree...I have yet to run into a rude poster. Everyone on here is very respectful of other poster's opinions or ideas..whether RDI or IDI.

Hey Albert....MY RDI flag is bigger than YOUR RDI flag....;) Oh yeah, and mine has flashing lights too!!!
 
Hi Fenton,

Welcome to this forum. I have also only recently become a member. However, I am definitely RDI. But great to hear differing opinions.

Dutchess
 
Dutchess said:
Hi Fenton,

Welcome to this forum. I have also only recently become a member. However, I am definitely RDI. But great to hear differing opinions.

Dutchess
Click to expand...

Hi Fenton,

Also CrimeLibrary has a huge IDI following. Just fyi.
 
Fenton said:
Hi, folks...I am a new member and would like to know if there are any others on this board that lean to the IDI theory?
Click to expand...


Fenton,

Welcome aboard, I am a RDI, but I will not discount the possibility of an IDI theory.

Apart from credibility, the problem any IDI theory is going to face is that there has not been one piece of forensic evidence deposited by an intruder at the crime-scene.

Do you have an intruder theory that includes a known suspect?


.
 
Solace said:
Hi Fenton,

Also CrimeLibrary has a huge IDI following. Just fyi.
Click to expand...


LOL..thanks for pointing this out...I was going to, but afraid that I would get into some sort of trouble.
 
UKGuy said:
Fenton,

...there has not been one piece of forensic evidence deposited by an intruder at the crime-scene.

.
Click to expand...

You're right. Not one but several:

Tape and cord. The tape and cord are like cousins. The rolls they came from are missing, and no other use of the same tape or cord has been found anywhere in the house.

Male DNA not matched to anybody, found nowhere else but JBR's underwear, and mixed with her blood. It doesn't get any more forensic than that.

2 1/2 pages of handwriting specimens.

Its a forensic evidence bonanza!
 
Holdontoyourhat said:
You're right. Not one but several:

Tape and cord. The tape and cord are like cousins. The rolls they came from are missing, and no other use of the same tape or cord has been found anywhere in the house.

Male DNA not matched to anybody, found nowhere else but JBR's underwear, and mixed with her blood. It doesn't get any more forensic than that.

2 1/2 pages of handwriting specimens.

Its a forensic evidence bonanza!
Click to expand...

Holdontoyourhat,

Sure but can you you link any of the above items to an intruder?

You left out JonBenet's missing size-6 underwear?


.
 
Holdontoyourhat said:
You're right. Not one but several:

Tape and cord. The tape and cord are like cousins. The rolls they came from are missing, and no other use of the same tape or cord has been found anywhere in the house.

Male DNA not matched to anybody, found nowhere else but JBR's underwear, and mixed with her blood. It doesn't get any more forensic than that.

2 1/2 pages of handwriting specimens.

Its a forensic evidence bonanza!
Click to expand...

Holdon,

But the DNA is OLDER than JonBenet's DNA. That it means it was there prior to that evening.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 125 more.
Total: 1,885 (members: 126, guests: 1,759)

Online statistics

Members online
126
Guests online
1,759
Total visitors
1,885
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
591,780
Messages
17,958,732
Members
228,606
Latest member
wdavewong
Back
Top