I think it's futile for Darlie to have a new trial. She would be tried for Devon's murder and I can assure you that Greg Davis will be all over it. It really won't change anything. Darin, her mother have been caught in lies. I have a couple of friends on FB that confronted Darlie Kee about a lie in the Robert Riggs video on YouTube. Darlie Kee states on the video that Darlie Lynn never took a polygraph. Documents from Lew Sterret state that she did. The results were never published. You know they couldn't have been beneficial because she would have released them if she had passed or even inconclusive.
When we asked Darlie Kee about the polygraph, she became very ugly and insulting.
I've even read one of Darlie's supporters call Darlie Kee a crazy-a$$ b**ch.
I am here: [ame="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.872629,-96.655470"]Google Maps[/ame]
You're right. My own page was made when supporters tried to shut the other 2 pages down. FB didn't shut them down. My page really isn't needed. So, please check out The Darlie Routier Case and The Darlie Routier is Guilty. Plenty of action there. Polygraphs have been known to be admitted and this polygraph was granted by the judge without the prosecutions knowledge. If it had helped her, it would've been used. She failed it.
I am here: [ame="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.872555,-96.655542"]Google Maps[/ame]
It was reported that after Darlie took the polygraph, she and her mother were seen sobbing in each others arms in the hallway. I wonder if any of Darlie's supporters would urge her to take another polygraph now that Darin has bailed.
But like I said polygraphs are unreliable. I don't care that she failed. Melvin Foster was thought to be the Green River Killer. He failed a polygraph. Gary Ridgeway passed his polygraph. Two tests in one case and both were wrong. Bill Wegerle failed his polygraph when he was accused of murdering his wife. Some years later BTK sent the local paper her driver's license and pictures he took at the crime scene. Obviously Bill didn't kill his wife.
I know some states require both parties in the case to agree about whether polygraph results can be used prior to taking the test. I'll admit I have no idea what the rules are in Texas about polygraphs. I would think that had she passed and tried to introduce it the DA would have had sound legal arguments about the validity of the test.
But for the reasons mentioned above polygraphs mean nothing to me. Innocent people fail them all the time.
And so do the guilty! (Actually, a polygraph machine does not detect truth or lies; it only measures galvanic responses. A polygraph is only as reliable as the examiner who knows what questions to ask and when.)
Darlie actually admits on national tv she took a polygraph and it was "inconclusive" She failed in other words, but the poly was administered by her defence, not the state.
Thanks Cami. That's is the point. Both women have been lying.
I am here: [ame="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.872757,-96.655537"]Google Maps[/ame]
I thought the same thing until I researched and discovered that he was in jail for another crime at the time of this murder.
I am here: [ame="http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=32.912983,-96.772752"]Google Maps[/ame]
I know she got she a new trial and statements changed but the core evidence didn't, plus certain people committed perjury on the stand..a la Cindy Anthony.
I believe Harper got away with the murder of her son Joel.
Let me be completely clear here: Tommy Lynn Sells has not and will never be convicted in that case so there is no finding of innocence in the mother's case...just "not guilty".
they are desperately trying to raise the money for the tests the state doesn't pay for.
No new trial needed. The first told the story and got it right. Who can sleep through anything like that? Her husband finally divorced for a reason.
Little Caylee Marie, must not be an "Anthony", since "the Anthony's always win". So sorry, Caylee.
She certainly should be given the right to DNA test whatever might turn-out to disprove the verdict. The US Courts recently ruled in her favor in that regard.
Only my opinion though nothing more.
I voted yes, ONLY because the jury didn't see all of the evidence AND she is on death row. If not for the death row, maybe I would have said no. I am not sure she will be executed, but the truth of the matter is that the jury didn't see everything. They didn't see the somber prayer service before the silly string at the graveside, they didn't see the defense wounds and bruises. I don't know if she did it or not, but let the jury decide with ALL of the evidence.
I will rely on the judges decision as to whether she deserves a new trial. Our courts are flawed but as close to fair as we have been able to get. Though I think she is guilty and rightly deserves death the technical side of things are best left to the judge.
It is upsetting that we have Michael Peterson getting a new trial and free in the mean time and Jeffrey Macdonald may get another trial. Yet the WM3 have to take an Alford plea to get out. Justice is not always just. And it isn't always fair to the victims either.
Many people can talk the talk, some people really know how to walk the walk, but it is a rare few who get to dance the dance!
ઇઉ Kimmy aka Cassata