1080 users online (244 members and 836 guests)  


Websleuths News


Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,710

    Question WWLD- What Would a (criminal defense) Lawyer Do?

    Here's a question for anyone out there who is a lawyer, has lunch with/ lives with/shares parents with/ gave birth to, or can run next door and ask a lawyer :

    Would you continue to represent a client, especially a pro-bono client, if he or she habitually disregarded your advice to avoid media, stop talking, flirting, bragging or anything else you've warned them will seriously hurt their case?


    Would your decision be any different for a high-profile case or client?

    Do you think it makes you look incompetent when a client repeatedly acts a fool in front of the press?

    Anyone with other lawyer questions please feel free to add.

    Thanks!
    Susan

  2. #2
    curiositycat's Avatar
    curiositycat is offline The one thing that doesn't abide by majority rule is a person's conscience
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Northern New Mexico
    Posts
    4,948
    My daughter once knew a public defender she dated in Denver "How can you represent these folks with a clear conscience?" she asked. The lawyer replied "It's not my job to "like" the person. They are my client and it's my job to give them the best representation I can, whether I think they are guilty or not."

    If you become a defense attorney I think you are conditioned to feel this way or you wouldn't go into that field of the law.

    Also, when they are not needy of a "public defender" and have money I would say that you would consider it a great way of paying off your student loans.
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect" Steven Wright

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,027
    I'm not a lawyer.
    IMO it depends on who the lawyer is. Did he take the case due to it being something that will put himself in the spotlight? Did he take the case because he sees it as a way to help someone he sees as getting a raw deal?
    I think there's a reason we have not seen a top level attorney with DP, any lawyer worth their salt can see this is a trainwreck of a case where the client will not do what would be in his best interests. That leads me to believe the 1 representing him did so with visions of being interviewed by the likes of LK and as long as he gets those perks does he really care how compliant his client is?

    VB

  4. #4
    I think there is a difference between the defense lawyer Drew now has and a so called normal defense lawyer. This guy is right up Drew's alley, he's so much like Drew I am sure they are two peas in a pod.
    I read that Drew was contacted by this lawyer after his first Today Show shout out for a lawyer. So right there you have your answer..none of the lawyers I know, friends or family, wanted in any way to jump on Drew's bandwagon, but this guy did.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,450
    Quote Originally Posted by curiositycat View Post
    My daughter once knew a public defender she dated in Denver "How can you represent these folks with a clear conscience?" she asked. The lawyer replied "It's not my job to "like" the person. They are my client and it's my job to give them the best representation I can, whether I think they are guilty or not."

    If you become a defense attorney I think you are conditioned to feel this way or you wouldn't go into that field of the law.

    Also, when they are not needy of a "public defender" and have money I would say that you would consider it a great way of paying off your student loans.
    Which is why there are so many lawyer jokes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    65
    Fox reported today that Peterson's lawyer had gotten himself into legal trouble by forging a dead man's signature on a probate document and received the funds himself.
    I told you a million times not to exaggerate.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,710
    "I told you a million times not to exaggerate."
    Welcome, Duck. I like your tag.

    Susan

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    23,796
    If Joel Brodsky has Drew P's best interests at heart instead of the bottom line (publicity and the money he can make off the case), he will look at the public opinion (representative of the jury pool after hearing the evidence in the case) He will talk with Drew P (really listening) He will find out the evidence that indicates Drew P's guilt. Then he will decide to do what is in Drew P's best interest.

    If Drew P is convicted, he is most likely looking at the death penalty. But if he steps forward, he can most likely get a plea deal by volunteering to plead guilty and offering information to the wherebouts of Stacy's body.
    Just when I think that I have seen the most depraved things a human can do to another human, somebody posts a new story...........

    Why is it that when a custodial parent fails to provide for a child it is called neglect and is a criminal matter. But when a non custodial parent fails to provide it is called failure to support and is a civil matter?


    "Just when the caterpillar thought its world was over, it became a butterfly" ~ Michelle Knight

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    4,043
    I'm not an attorney, nor do I portray one on TV but IMO, DP is shopping around for a high profile attorney by way of his reckless TV interviews.
    I think he knows exactly what he is doing and is hoping Mark Geragos comes along with a need to defend another guilty Peterson man.

    I can tell you this: If I was a criminal defense attorney, and if I took on the repugnant task of representing this man, I would never ask him if he was guilty, and I would require a firm agreement that he never told me of his own volition either. I think my best defense would be to create a speck of reasonable doubt in the absence of a body, as the situation currently exists.
    I would also try to exclude everything related to Kathleen Savio's death, because I am 99% certain he killed her also.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,450
    Quote Originally Posted by SeekingJana View Post
    I'm not an attorney, nor do I portray one on TV but IMO, DP is shopping around for a high profile attorney by way of his reckless TV interviews.
    I think he knows exactly what he is doing and is hoping Mark Geragos comes along with a need to defend another guilty Peterson man.

    I can tell you this: If I was a criminal defense attorney, and if I took on the repugnant task of representing this man, I would never ask him if he was guilty, and I would require a firm agreement that he never told me of his own volition either. I think my best defense would be to create a speck of reasonable doubt in the absence of a body, as the situation currently exists.
    I would also try to exclude everything related to Kathleen Savio's death, because I am 99% certain he killed her also.

    Addition: stop talking to the media, DP.




Similar Threads

  1. Criminal Defense Attorney for Casey - Linda Kenney Baden
    By Rum Tum Tugger in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 430
    Last Post: 06-18-2011, 11:27 PM
  2. Terri Horman retains criminal defense attorney!
    By pufnstuf in forum Kyron Horman
    Replies: 314
    Last Post: 10-24-2010, 10:32 PM
  3. D. Casey Hires High Profile Criminal Defense Attorney
    By bunnyphoenix1 in forum Caylee Anthony 2 years old
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 06-05-2009, 11:54 AM